I Thought All Earbuds Were the Same—Until I Found Out What Cheap Models Leave Out

I Thought All Earbuds Were the Same—Until I Found Out What Cheap Models Leave Out

Cheap earbuds might seem like a bargain, but they often skip crucial features that make all the difference. The real question is: which features are you sacrificing without even knowing it?

6

Water Resistance Certification

soundcore aerofit 2 earbuds worn by male in ear.

Gavin Phillips / MakeUseOf

Cheap earbuds either skip water protection entirely or offer vague “splash-resistant” claims without any official rating. That leaves you guessing whether a sweaty workout or light rain might damage your earbuds. High-end earbuds, however, typically come with proper IP (Ingress Protection) ratings, like IPX4, IPX5, or even IPX7.

IP ratings indicate how well your earbuds can withstand water or dust. For example, IPX4 means protection against light splashes and sweat, while IPX7 means it can survive being submerged in three feet of water for up to 30 minutes.

This is a big deal if you’re active. Whether you’re jogging or hitting the gym, knowing your earbuds can handle moisture without shorting out offers serious peace of mind.

5

Smart Tracking

With cheap earbuds, losing one can feel like game over. Drop an earbud under the couch, leave it at the gym, or misplace the case in your bag, and you’re often stuck searching blindly—or worse, having to buy a new pair altogether.

High-end earbuds, however, often integrate with smartphone apps or ecosystems to help you locate them. Apple’s AirPods, for example, connect to the Find My network, allowing you to see their last known location on a map, make them play a sound to help locate them, or even get proximity alerts if you leave them behind.

Pixel Buds Pro 2's Find My Device in action

Sanuj Bhatia / MakeUseOf

Google’s Pixel Buds Pro 2 also have seamless integration with Android’s Find My Device network, and thus, you can track their location or play sound from the case if you misplace them. Samsung’s Galaxy Buds and some newer Sony models offer similar tracking features through their apps.

If you’ve used cheap earbuds for a while, you’ve probably wished there was a way to track them down after misplacing them.

4

Wear Detection

Cheap earbuds often continue to play audio, even when they’re not plugged in. You might think this is standard, but not all earbuds behave this way. Higher-end earbuds use tiny sensors to detect when they’re in your ears. If you take one out, your audio automatically pauses. Pop it back in, and playback resumes right where you left off.

Wear detection isn’t just about convenience—it’s practical, too. If someone stops you to talk, you don’t lose your place in a podcast or audiobook. Plus, wear detection helps preserve battery life by stopping playback when you’re not listening. Cheaper models often skip this feature entirely to save costs, so you have to pause audio when you pop out the earbuds.

3

Audio Quality

Audio quality is where the gap between cheap and premium earbuds becomes impossible to ignore. A huge part of why mid to high-end earbuds sound much better than cheap ones comes down to what’s inside: better drivers, smarter tuning, and advanced EQ options. Cheap earbuds usually rely on basic, low-cost drivers that can’t deliver deep bass, crisp highs, or subtle details in music, especially instrumental genres like jazz and classical. The result is a flat sound.

man wearing nothing ear open earbuds left side view.

Gavin Phillips / MakeUseOf

In contrast, mid-range and high-end earbuds use better drivers, thus reproducing a wider frequency range with greater accuracy. As such, you can enjoy better sound without distortion, even at higher volumes. But it’s not just about hardware—tuning also plays a major role in audio quality. Mid- to high-end earbuds are also carefully tweaked to reproduce high-quality sound by shaping the frequency response to achieve a specific signature sound.

This explains why they sound good out of the box, and you may not need to customize the sound profile. On top of that, good quality models offer customizable EQ settings through companion apps, letting you adjust bass, mids, or treble to match your taste. Moreover, higher-quality earbuds often support advanced audio codecs like aptX, AAC, LC3, or LDAC, which transmit music at higher resolution than the basic SBC codec most cheap models use.

Related

How Do Bluetooth Codecs Work? Which One Is Best?

Not all Bluetooth codecs are the same, and the one you choose makes a huge difference to how your music sounds.

That means richer detail, better dynamics, and less compression. You’ll also experience lower latency, which helps ensure audio-visual desync is less noticeable when gaming. Beyond basic stereo, high-end models also offer virtual surround sound—or spatial audio—like Apple’s Spatial Audio or Sony’s 360 Reality Audio. It might seem unnecessary, but there are certain times when spatial audio is important.

2

Multi-Point Connectivity

Multi-point connectivity is one of those underrated features you won’t appreciate until you have it—and once you do, it’s hard to live without. Cheap earbuds often connect to just one device at a time, which is fine if you only own one device. But since most of us use several devices daily, this means constant disconnecting and reconnecting when switching between your phone, laptop, or tablet.

Midrange to high-end earbuds save you from this hassle with multi-point connectivity, which allows you to connect to more than one device at the same time. Typically, these earbuds can connect with two devices, but the Technics EAH-AZ100 set the bar in early 2025 by offering the unique ability to connect to three devices simultaneously.

A key benefit of multi-point connectivity is that you can listen to music on your laptop, and if a call comes in on your phone, the earbuds will automatically switch to it. Once the call ends, they automatically switch back to your music or video. This small convenience makes a big difference if you regularly juggle devices throughout the day, and unless you’ve experienced it firsthand, you might not realize what you’re missing.

1

Transparency Mode and Better ANC

One of the biggest surprises I had when switching from cheap earbuds to higher-quality ones was discovering the magic of transparency mode and advanced active noise cancellation (ANC). Cheap earbuds might advertise “noise cancellation,” but it’s often just passive noise isolation—meaning they block sound physically, like earplugs, rather than using smart tech.

Related

What Is Active Noise Cancellation and How Does It Work?

ANC headphones and earbuds are everywhere, but not all ANC is the same.

And while some budget models, such as the Anker Space A40, offer ANC, it’s not as good as what you’ll get on premium options like the Sony WF-1000XM5 or Apple AirPods Pro 2. Premium earbuds have a far superior ANC that is capable of shutting out more noise for a much quieter listening experience, even in noisy surroundings.

But as incredible as ANC is, there are times you don’t want to block out the world completely—for example, crossing a street, waiting for an announcement at the airport, or chatting quickly with someone nearby. That’s where transparency or ambient mode comes in handy. Besides canceling outside noise, quality earbuds can let outside sound through at the touch of a button, so you don’t need to remove them to talk to someone or stay updated on nearby announcements.

nothing ear open right earbud held in hand close up view.

Gavin Phillips / MakeUseOf

Some models, like the Technics EAH-AZ100 give you full control over their ANC and transparency modes so you can increase or decrease the strength as you see fit. The Sony WF-1000XM5, on the other hand, offers the option to switch between ANC and transparency mode automatically (and vice versa) depending on ambient noise levels or your location. Such versatility isn’t available on cheap earbuds.

If you’ve been exclusively buying cheap earbuds, consider upgrading to mid- or high-end options in the future, as you’re missing out on a lot. Cheap earbuds might offer good enough sound quality (and most of them do), but there are so many additional perks that you miss out on. Now more than ever, investing in quality earbuds is worth every penny.

A mushroom casket marks a first for ‘green burials’ in the US

A mushroom casket marks a first for ‘green burials’ in the US

“I’m probably the only architect who created a final home,” Bob Hendrikx tells The Verge. Tombs and catacombs aside, Hendrikx might be the only one to make a final home using mushrooms.

Hendrikx is the founder and CEO of Loop Biotech, a company that makes caskets out of mycelium, the fibrous root structure of mushrooms. This June, the first burial in North America to use one of Loop Biotech’s caskets took place in Maine.

“He always said he wanted to be buried naked in the woods.”

The mushroom casket gives people one more option to leave the living with a gentler impact, part of a growing array of what are supposed to be more sustainable alternatives to traditional burials. Mycelium has also had a moment in recent years, with other eco-conscious designers making biodegradable packaging, leather, and bricks from the material.

Hendrikx started out trying to make a “living home” from mycelium, a material that can be used to make self-healing structures if the fibers continue to grow. While he was studying architecture at Delft University of Technology, he says someone asked him what would happen if their grandma happened to die in that home.

A man and a woman stand side by side with their arms around each other in woods. They are standing in a ditch next to a mushroom casket that has sunflowers laid on top of it.

Bob Hendrikx and Marsya Ancker at a ceremony for her father in Maine.
Photo courtesy of Loop Biotech

“It would be great, because there’s going to be so much positivity for Earth,” he recalls answering and then thinking — “Oh my God, this should be a casket.” The mushroom casket became his graduation project, and Hendrikx started Loop Biotech in the Netherlands in 2021.

The casket, which Loop Biotech calls a “Living Cocoon” and sells for around $4,000, is made entirely of mycelium and can be grown in seven days. It can then biodegrade completely in about 45 days, according to the company. The body inside, however, takes longer. In a typical casket, it could be decades before a body fully decomposes. But since fungi can help break down dead organic matter, that time shortens to two to three years in a Living Cocoon, Hendrikx says.

“I personally hate the idea of a body just lying there in the ground,” says Marsya Ancker, whose father, Mark Ancker, was laid to rest in a Living Cocoon in Maine in June. “I don’t want to lie in the ground, but I’m happy to become part of the soil and feed the plants.” She heard about Loop Biotech in a TED Talk years ago and decided to call up the company the day after she got the call that her dad had passed.

A black and white white photo of a man wearing glasses and smiling at the camera. He has a moustache and wears a pin on his jacket that says “question authority.”

Mark Ancker lays on the Charlie’s Angels pinball machine, “of which he was the campus king” at his university, according to his daughter, Marsya Ancker.
Photo courtesy of Marsya Ancker

“He would have gotten a kick out of it, out of the fact that he was the first [to be buried in a Living Cocoon],” Marsya adds. Her family’s not one to miss an opportunity. Marsya described an iconic photo of her dad sitting on a green Volkswagen bus on the way to Woodstock, looking out over a traffic jam with binoculars, soon after Marsya was born and came home from the hospital. “Don’t be ridiculous,” there’s no sense in wasting both their tickets, Marsya says her mom told her dad.

“He always said he wanted to be buried naked in the woods,” Marsya says. “As a younger person, that horrified me. I’m like, ‘But how will I remember you?’ … This way he gets to be buried naked in the woods.” And she’ll have something there to remember him by; the family planted a memorial garden with some of Mark’s favorite perennials on the land where he was buried. Loop Biotech says its mushroom casket will help enrich the soil below.

Marsya also finds the chemicals used in embalming “gross.” A desire to minimize waste and pollution is another reason some people are turning away from standard caskets or cremation.

Conventional burials in the US use around 4.3 million gallons of embalming fluid, 20 million board feet of hardwood, and 1.6 million tons of reinforced concrete each year, according to the Green Burial Council.

The first Living Cocoon burial in the US (which follows thousands more using Loop Biotech’s mushroom casket in Europe), shows “there’s excitement and energy around green burial,” says Sam Bar, who is part of the board of directors of the Green Burial Council.

A “green” burial doesn’t have to incorporate mushrooms, of course. The goal is primarily to encourage decomposition and use natural materials in a sustainable way, Bar says. That can also be accomplished using other materials that break down more easily, like woven sea grass or bamboo. “Green is a spectrum,” Bar says.

Ever the architect, Hendrikx has also kept comfortable design in mind with his Living Cocoon. Aside from the potential environmental benefits, the mushroom casket is also soft to the touch and rounded, he points out to The Verge. “So instead of having, like, a hard, pointy casket, you now have something that you can actually hug,” Hendrikx says. “Which is really nice for the grieving process.”

“Skytech Rampage Gaming PC: Ryzen 7 9700X, NVIDIA RTX 4070 Super, 1TB SSD, 32GB RAM, 360mm ARGB AIO”: Available now at [price_with_discount]

“Skytech Rampage Gaming PC: Ryzen 7 9700X, NVIDIA RTX 4070 Super, 1TB SSD, 32GB RAM, 360mm ARGB AIO”: Available now at [price_with_discount]

Skytech Gaming offers the cutting-edge Skytech Rampage series, featuring top-tier components such as NVIDIA RTX series graphics cards and an AMD Ryzen 7 Processor. With years of experience in the industry, Skytech Gaming is committed to providing premium gaming experiences to customers through custom and pre-built gaming PCs. The Skytech Rampage is designed to handle popular games at Ultra settings and delivers stunning 1440p Quad HD resolution with smooth gameplay exceeding 60 FPS.

The specifications of the Skytech Rampage include an AMD Ryzen 7 9700X 3.8GHz (5.5GHz Turbo Boost) CPU Processor, 32GB DDR5 RAM, NVIDIA Geforce 4070 Super graphics, and a 1TB NVMe M.2 SSD. It also features a 360mm AIO Liquid CPU Cooler with ARGB Fans, ensuring efficient cooling performance. The gaming PC comes with Windows 11 Home 64-bit, 802.11 AC wireless support, and no bloatware.

The Skytech Rampage is equipped with high-spec AIO liquid coolers for unmatched cooling performance, allowing users to unleash the full potential of the hardware without thermal throttling. The PC comes with a one-year warranty on parts and labor, lifetime free technical support, and is assembled in the USA. It is capable of running a wide range of games at Ultra settings, including popular titles like Call of Duty, Fortnite, Grand Theft Auto VI, and more.

Overall, the Skytech Rampage series offers unparalleled price-to-performance value in the current market, making it an excellent choice for gamers looking for a high-quality gaming PC.

Price: $1,699.99
(as of Nov 06, 2024 11:01:52 UTC – Details)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 review: stunning, bendy, and spendy

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 review: stunning, bendy, and spendy

I’ve been using the Galaxy Z Fold 7 for a week, and I’ve run out of ways to say “It’s so nice.” It’s not essential, or life-changing; it’s nice.

It’s an understatement, though. Samsung joins the likes of Honor and Oppo in making a folding phone that’s almost as thin as a regular phone, and it’s a trend with real benefits. Compared to the previous six generations of Samsung folding phones, the Z Fold 7’s inner screen feels like a bonus — one that doesn’t require the sacrifice of carrying a bigger, bulkier device to get. It is thin. It is luxurious. Also: it is two thousand dollars.

It’s so nice. It’s two thousand dollars. Somewhere in between those two statements, you’ll know whether the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is for you. If the size and bulk of previous foldables deterred you, then this is the phone you’ve been waiting for. Provided you have, you know, a couple grand lying around.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 in blueSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 in blue

$2000

The Good

  • Ridiculously slim and light for a foldable
  • All-day battery with moderate use
  • Outer screen finally feels normal

The Bad

  • It’s $2,000
  • Durability still a concern
  • Camera bump makes it wobble on a table

Writing a review of the Fold 7 feels like writing a review of two devices: the one you use with the phone closed, and the one that’s available with the phone open. The former got a major upgrade this year: it uses a normal 21:9 aspect ratio. Previous versions of the outer screen were longer and skinnier than your average phone, and I never quite got used to typing on them. I sometimes forget I’m using a folding phone when the Z Fold 7 is closed.

It works just like a regular slab-style phone outside of some extreme use cases. And for a folding phone? That’s mission accomplished.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 in blue showing front screen

See? Normal.

Here’s the Z Fold 7’s dilemma: that outer screen is a 6.5-inch 1080p display that’s not as sharp or as pleasant to use in bright light as the outstanding screen on the far cheaper Galaxy S25 Ultra. That’s a point I kept revisiting as I used the Z Fold 7. As a total package there’s almost nothing like it, but plenty of its individual features fall short of the best slab-style phones.

Non-foldy phones offer better battery life, but the margin isn’t as wide as I feared. How much you use the inner screen will dramatically affect battery life; I got through a day of moderate use and occasional inner screen use with around 50 percent left. With more time on the inner screen and about an hour of hotspot use, the battery was down to around 30 percent by bedtime. Nobody’s buying a folding phone for its power efficiency, and I think these results are pretty good.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 in blue showing inner screen

Once you get started, you’ll find all kinds of use cases for the inner screen.

As soon as I open the inner screen, the slight shortcomings are out of mind. I kept forgetting that the inner screen even existed, but I quickly got into the habit of opening it. Do you know how nice it is to use Chrome on your phone with normal-ass tabs at the top of the screen? Do you know how much less fiddly a game like Diablo Immortal is on a big screen? Do you know how useful it is to keep the Uber app open on one side of the display so you can keep track of your driver’s arrival while you finish a sudoku on the other half? I do. Once you start using the inner screen, you keep finding new ways to use it.

None of the above is new or exclusive to the Fold 7, but I can’t emphasize this enough: this all feels like you’re getting away with something, because the experience of using this phone while it’s closed feels normal. No more chunky brick in the side pocket of my yoga pants. One nitpick: I don’t love how stiff it feels when I’m opening the phone. The grip from a case would help here. Overall, a slimmer, lighter, well-proportioned foldable really is a whole new ballgame.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 in blue and Galaxy Z Fold 6

Good news: this phone is way thinner than the Z Fold 6 (top). Bad news: that camera bump.

There’s some bad news. I’m not one to get worked up about the way any camera bump looks, but this one protrudes a lot. The phone sits crooked on surfaces and wobbles when you tap the screen, which encourages you to put it on a table screen-side-down. Fewer distractions from notifications? Good! The screen is slippery and the phone slides off the edge of the bathtub? Bad! There wasn’t any water in the tub when that happened, but still.

The wobble is annoying; I have to prop it up on a couple of drink coasters if I’m using it on the dining room table. Samsung’s silicone grip case seems to mitigate it, but stand cases don’t fix it. A case feels like a requirement here (and I say that as a case hater!), but they’re thin enough they don’t erase all the benefits of a slim foldable.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 shown on a table

Expect a lot of this unless you put a case on the phone or prop it up when it’s on a flat surface.

The Fold 7 uses a Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset tuned for Samsung, along with 12GB of RAM in the 256GB model I tested. It keeps up just fine, and I had no problems running Diablo Immortal at the highest display settings. The phone didn’t even get very warm. The Z Fold 7 did get mighty toasty in a bit of a torture test: using it as a hotspot on a coffee shop patio on a high-80s afternoon. I put it in the direct sun, which you should not do, and sure enough, it started closing apps after about 10 minutes to try and cool itself down. Extreme, yes, but good to know if you live in a place with high temperatures.

Another environmental consideration: dust resistance. The Z Fold 7 still doesn’t have a formal dust resistance rating; its IP48 means it’s fully water-resistant but only immune to very small particles, not specks of dust. Take extra care and consider adding Samsung’s extended warranty plan to cover pricey inner screen repairs.

The Z Fold 7’s 200-megapixel camera is adapted from the S25 Ultra’s, and it’s a great camera here, just as it is in the Ultra. Low-light photos are detailed, provided your subject isn’t moving too much, and Samsung’s preference for vibrant reds and blues is on full display. There’s also a 10-megapixel 3x telephoto and a 12-megapixel ultrawide — both solid performers if you don’t ask too much from them. Digital zoom past 5x from the telephoto lens looks pretty watercolor-y. But Samsung’s portrait mode with the 3x camera remains the best in the game, as it has been for years. Segmentation is so good it’s uncanny — isolating a subject down to the eyelashes on my son’s eyes.

If you compare the Z Fold 7 to a top-tier slab phone like the S25 Ultra spec by spec, the folding phone often comes up short. It’s less durable, battery life isn’t quite as good, and the camera system isn’t as versatile. But that misses the point of the Z Fold 7. This phone is a luxury and an engineering marvel. If you have the deep pockets and a mind open to the benefits of the big screen, then I think you’ll agree with me: it’s just so nice.

Photography by Allison Johnson / The Verge

Agree to Continue: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

Every smart device now requires you to agree to a series of terms and conditions before you can use it — contracts that no one actually reads. It’s impossible for us to read and analyze every single one of these agreements. But we started counting exactly how many times you have to hit “agree” to use devices when we review them since these are agreements most people don’t read and definitely can’t negotiate.

To use the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, you must agree to:

  • Samsung’s Terms and Conditions
  • Samsung’s Privacy Policy
  • Google’s Terms of Service (including Privacy Policy)
  • Google Play’s Terms of Service
  • Automatic installs (including from Google, Samsung, and your carrier)

There are many optional agreements. If you use a carrier-specific version, there will be more of them. Here are just a few:

  • Sending diagnostic data to Samsung
  • Samsung services, including auto blocker, customization service, continuity service, nearby device scanning, personal data intelligence, and smart suggestions
  • Google Drive backup, location services, Wi-Fi scanning, diagnostic data
  • Bixby privacy policy (required to use Bixby), plus optional for Bixby options like personalized content, data access, and audio recording review

There may be more. For example, Samsung’s Weather app also has its own privacy policy that may include sharing information with Weather.com.

Final tally: there are five mandatory agreements and at least 10 optional ones.

Top book-style and clamshell foldables

Top book-style and clamshell foldables

Foldable smartphones have gone from strength to strength in the past couple of years; these once-chunky, fragile devices are now slimmer, more robust and more capable, and that means they’re more tempting than ever.

The question is, which foldable should you buy? While there was initially a limited number of foldable available, that number has greatly expanded in the past 12 months. Whether you’re looking for the slimmest book-style foldable around, a compact clamshell-style foldable that fits in the palm of your hand or something that helps you multitask on the go, there’s a foldable for your needs.

Now it’s worth noting that foldable phones are still more fragile than regular smartphones, with none yet to offer full IP68 dust and water resistance, and the flexible nature of foldable screens means that there is potential for damage, but these could be worthy trade-offs depending on your needs.

Durability issues and premium prices are the main reasons why we’ve yet to give any foldable the coveted five-star rating and remain key reasons to opt for a traditional flagship – though a couple of foldable entries have come closer than ever, suggesting that foldables are slowly but surely closing the gap.

You can see a selection of some of the most impressive regular phones we’ve tested in our best iPhone, best Android phone and best phone buyers’ guides for context.

However, if that doesn’t put you off, keep reading. In this list, we’ve detailed the top-performing foldables we’ve tried and tested.

Advertisement

Best foldable phones at a glance

SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST

Learn more about how we test phones

All the phones included in our Best foldable phone list have been thoroughly tested and used by one of our expert reviewers.

We don’t review phones based purely on benchmark scores or marketing hype. We use them as our everyday device for the review period, which is usually at least five days but can often be much longer if the device requires it.

Whenever you read a phone review published on Trusted Reviews, you should be confident that the reviewer has put their personal SIM card into the phone, synced across their most-used apps and logged into all their typical accounts. We do this so you’ll feel confident in our review and trust our verdict.

Our review process includes a mixture of real-world tests, more than 15 measured tests, and industry-standard benchmarks. We believe this gives the most rounded view of a device.


  • Excellent and brighter external display

  • Solid camera performance

  • Unique finish options

  • Smooth performance


  • Only 3 years of Android OS updates

  • Moto AI still needs work

  • No telephoto lens

Samsung may have been the first company to truly bring new-age flip phones to the masses, but it’s Motorola that’s taken the torch and run with it, emboldening the concept with key areas of innovation that have culminated thus far in the outstanding Motorola Razr 60 Ultra.

The key headline here is that both the internal and external displays have been given several upgrades. For starters, the internal display is now slightly bigger, moving from 6.9-inches to 7-inches, so you have more space than ever to help make gaming and watching films feel even more immersive.

The brightness of that internal display has also shot up to 4500nits, making it easier than ever to use outdoors against direct sunlight. The 4-inch external display hasn’t been left behind either, with that also seeing a brightness boost, going from 2400nits to now 3000nits, which really goes a long way towards making the more compact screen pop.

Even with those screen upgrades in tow, Motorola hasn’t forgotten about the one thing that should always be the focus of any foldable device: durability. Thankfully the company has introduced a new titanium-infused hinge which not only feels more sturdy than before, it has also allowed the phone to now carry an IP48 dust and water resistance rating, which significantly outperforms the IPX8 rating of the Razr 50 Ultra.

Powering all of this is the super fast Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, which has a sizeable 16GB RAM to lean on for everyday operations. You won’t have any issues playing the latest games here, and with 512GB storage as standard, you won’t be running out of room where apps are concerned either.


  • Lightest book-style foldable around

  • Ultra thin design makes it really nice to use

  • Larger, wider, wholly more useful screens

  • Same main camera as Galaxy S25 Ultra


  • Relatively small 4400mAh battery

  • Slow 25W wired charging

  • Zoom camera could be better for the price

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 marks a genuine leap forward for Samsung’s book-style foldable, finally delivering the ultra-slim, lightweight design many have been waiting for.

Shedding much of the bulk and weight of its predecessors, the 4.2mm-thick Fold 7 is now among the thinnest foldables around, and at 215g, it’s both lighter than the book-style competition and even the Galaxy S25 Ultra. It makes it a joy to handle, and it’s almost unnoticeable in the pocket as a result.

Samsung has also nailed the usability of both displays this year. The wider 6.5-inch cover screen is genuinely practical for everyday tasks, while the 8-inch internal panel feels more solid with a way less intrusive crease. Both screens are bright, vibrant and ideal for everything from gaming to multitasking.

Camera performance is another highlight, with the main 200MP sensor borrowed from the S25 Ultra delivering sharp, detailed shots that put the Fold 7 on par with regular bar phones. General performance is equally impressive, thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite and up to 16GB of RAM.

Battery life and charging remain the main drawbacks with a 4400mAh cell and 25W charging falling far behind rivals. Still, for most users, the Fold 7 will comfortably last a day, and the overall package is compelling enough to make it the standout book-style foldable of 2025.


  • The updated design really works

  • Great software

  • Strong main camera

  • Very bright screens


  • Camera system inferior to Pixel 9 Pro

  • Display crease is very visible

  • Slow charging

With a 6.3-inch outer panel that feels just like using a Pixel 9 Pro and an 8-inch inner panel with a tweaked aspect ratio, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a welcome refresh from its predecessor, the Pixel Fold.

There is one issue with the inner panel and that’s the noticeable crease in the centre. How big an issue this is depends on your personal preference however as we know it is possible for a foldable to be near-creaseless, like the Honor Magic V3 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, the crease feels like a bitter pill to swallow.

Otherwise the Pixel 9 Pro Fold runs on Google’s Tensor G4 processor which prioritises AI performance over sheer power. While this means the handset scored fairly low during our Geekbench tests, in reality we found that it performed well in everyday use, with apps opening quickly and games playing well too.

Overall the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is made up of five cameras, including three rear and two 10MP selfie lenses. The rear trio might not be as powerful as the Pixel 9 Pro or Pixel 9 Pro XL but thanks to Google’s image processing capabilities, shots have a contrast-heavy finish with natural-looking results.

Naturally as part of the Pixel lineup, the 9 Pro Fold is packed with heaps of AI powered tools, especially for photo editing. Remove unwanted distractions from images with just a tap thanks to Magic Editor or with the Pixel 9 exclusive Add Me, you can ensure the photographer is never left out of a group shot again.

That’s not where the Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s AI prowess ends. The handset comes preloaded with apps including Pixel Screenshots which collects and organises your screenshots and Pixel Studio for generating images based on user prompts.

Although the Pixel 9 Pro Fold packs a smaller battery than its predecessor, we did find the handset could just about get through the day on a single charge.

If you’re keen to experience the AI and photography capabilities of the Pixel lineup but want a more unique handset, then the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is an ideal choice.


  • Solid foldable hardware with minimal display crease

  • Custom foldable camera tech

  • Unique Open Canvas multitasking software

  • True fast charging capabilities


  • IPX4 water resistance isn’t the best

  • Still hefty at 245g

If you’re on the hunt for a book-style foldable with superb software, you’ll find no better than the OnePlus Open.

Its approach to foldable tech is genuinely useful, with elements like Open Canvas multitasking software that lets you use three apps in full-screen mode with ease, a handy app toolbar that can display over other apps, the ability to close the foldable and carry on what you were doing on the cover screen with a swipe and much more. It is a great experience, and one that we hope other foldable manufacturers emulate in future.

It also helps that the OnePlus Open has pretty impressive hardware on offer. The OnePlus Open sports a regular 6.3-inch 20:9 display with all the premium bells and whistles you’d expect from a flagship screen, including an adaptive 120Hz refresh rate, impressive peak brightness of 2800nits and a pixel-packed resolution.

This all means there’s no compromise using the cover display in place of the larger internal one for anything from replying to texts to casually scrolling on Instagram.

Of course, it’s all about the foldable inner display, and OnePlus has knocked it out of the park here too. There’s a much shallower central crease than the competition, so much so that it’s hard to see unless you’re looking at it off-angle, and there’s barely any change in tactile feedback as you run your finger over it. That makes the 7.86-inch OLED panel an absolute joy to use.

That stellar performance continues with the camera setup, boasting a trio of rear lenses that, unlike most of the competition, are all designed specifically for use in foldables. That translates to strong performance from not only the 48MP primary and ultrawide sensors, but the 64MP periscope lens in particular, delivering great shots at 3.5x, 6x and although images are pretty terrible at the full 120x, it does a good job up until the 25x mark.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is starting to get a little long in the tooth, but it still performs pretty well in everyday tasks. Throw in fast 67W SuperVOOC charging with a charger in the box and OnePlus’ signature volume slider, and you’ve got a very tempting book-style flagship that costs less than others on the market.


  • Welcome durability improvements

  • A well-rounded camera experience

  • Galaxy AI smarts

  • Top-end performance


  • Hit-and-miss battery life

  • 3.4-inch cover screen isn’t the most useful around

  • Still gets hot, despite new vapour chamber

Editor’s note: Samsung has released the Z Flip 7, and we’re in the process of reviewing the foldable. It’ll likely replace the older Z Flip 6 in our chart, but we can’t say for sure right now. 

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 is perhaps the most well-known clamshell available right now. It’s also ideal if you’re concerned about the fragility of these foldable devices thanks to some much-needed upgrades in durability.

Visually, the Galaxy Z Flip 6 looks very similar to the Z Flip 5 that came before it. However, the hinge is stronger and more impact-resistant this time around, feeling tighter and more stable than most flip phones. The device is also dust-resistant for the first time and about as water-resistant as it gets with its IP48 rating.

The 3.4-inch cover display remains a major upgrade compared to the smaller screen on the Z Flip 4, though this display has been overshadowed by the larger and more useful screen on the Motorola Razr 50. Unfold the device and you’ll find a tall and narrow 6.7-inch inner display with a 120Hz refresh rate that we found to be clear and crisp.

Cameras have also been a major point of improvement this time around, with the Z Flip 6 sharing the same 50-megapixel main sensor as the Galaxy S24 Plus, along with a refreshed 12-megapixel ultra-wide lens. There’s no zoom lens here, but the main camera is a strong performer in pretty much any situation from bright daylight to nighttime and an ultra-wide lens is something rivals like the Razr 50 Ultra miss out on.

The Z Flip 6 is also powered by the same custom version of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 found across the rest of Samsung’s line-up, making this one of the most powerful foldables around capable of benchmarking alongside some of the best flagship devices. The foldable is packed with useful Galaxy AI features, including a translation tool that makes the most of its dual-screen folding form factor.

Finally, the battery offers a full day of regular use, though charging it quite slow compared to many devices on the market.

However, if you’re looking for a solid all-round foldable experience, the Galaxy Z Flip 6 delivers with a new, more durable design and improved camera experience.


  • Larger, more useful cover screen

  • Upgraded 50MP parimary camera

  • All-day battery life

  • Premium features like IPX8 & wireless charging


  • Mid-range MediaTek chipset

  • 13MP ultrawide camera remains unchanged

  • Only three OS upgrades

  • Not much in the way of AI capabilities – yet

Editor’s note: Motorola has released the Razr 60, and we’re in the process of reviewing the new affordable foldable. It’ll likely replace the older Razr 50 in our chart, but we can’t say for sure right now. 

The Motorola Razr 50 is a fantastic entry-level foldable that addresses practically every complaint we had with the Razr 40 while also matching the Razr 50 Ultra in many key areas.

The Razr 50 features a clamshell design, an attractive vegan leather rear and a spacious 3.6-inch 90Hz cover screen, making the outer display more useful than that on the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 at a fraction of the cost. The build quality has improved too, with an IPX8 water-resistance rating and a hinge mechanism that feels just as rigid and premium as that on the Razr 50 Ultra.

The larger cover screen makes it possible to run full-screen apps without unfolding the phone, while the 6.9-inch 120Hz pOLED inner display with an FHD+ resolution and a peak brightness of 3000 nits. The crease is also significantly less noticeable this time around, putting the dip more in line with the Z Flip series.

The cameras have also been given an upgrade, with the dual layout including a 50-megapixel main sensor and a 13-megapixel ultra-wide camera, along with a 32-megapixel selfie camera in the display. This is the same main camera found in the Razr 50 Ultra, producing vibrant and detailed daytime shots with a good amount of natural bokeh.

Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, this foldable offers solid mid-range performance and comes paired with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage as standard. There are some AI features to get excited about, including the Image Enhancement Engine and Google Gemini access on the cover screen, though its AI features aren’t as expansive as that of the Galaxy Z Flip 6 or even the Razr 50 Ultra.

Finally, the Razr 50 is equipped with a 4200 mAh battery that offers a full day of use and can charge fully in just under an hour. If you’re on the hunt for an affordable foldable, the Motorola Razr 50 won’t disappoint.

FAQs

Is Apple going to make a foldable phone?

Apple hasn’t released or announced any intention to make a foldable phone yet, however rumours swirl that we’ll see a big play for this category from the Cupertino company in the coming years. For now, all the best foldable phones run on Android.

Advertisement

Test Data

  Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold OnePlus Open Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 Motorola Razr 50
Geekbench 6 single core 2828 2318 1878 1380 1910 1054
Geekbench 6 multi core 8552 8828 4049 4349 6264 3022
Max brightness 2800 nits
1 hour video playback (Netflix, HDR) 6 % 8 % 9 % 7 % 6 % 6 %
30 minute gaming (light) 5 % 7 % 8 % 7 % 6 %
1 hour music streaming (online) 2 %
1 hour music streaming (offline) 2 %
Time from 0-100% charge 80 min 87 min 105 min 46 min 75 min 59 min
Time from 0-50% charge 39 Min 31 Min 35 Min 22 Min 26 Min 25 Min
30-min recharge (included charger) 67 % 61 %
15-min recharge (included charger) 35 % 35 %
30-min recharge (no charger included) 40 % 49 % 46 % 58 %
15-min recharge (no charger included) 23 % 24 % 22 % 30 %
3D Mark – Wild Life 6294 5574 2595 3559 4397 859
GFXBench – Aztec Ruins 105 fps 70 fps 38 fps 38 fps 80 fps 20 fps
GFXBench – Car Chase 95 fps 71 fps 48 fps 47 fps 80 fps 27 fps

Full Specs

  Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Review Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Review OnePlus Open Review Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 Review Motorola Razr 50 Review
UK RRP £1099.99 £1799 £1749 £1599 £1049 £799
USA RRP $1999 $1799 $1699 $999 $799
EU RRP €1799
Manufacturer Motorola Samsung Google OnePlus Samsung Motorola
Screen Size 7 inches 8 inches 8 inches 7.82 inches 6.7 inches 6.9 mm
Storage Capacity 512GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB 512GB 256GB, 512GB 256GB
Rear Camera 50MP + 50MP 200MP + 12MP + 10MP 48MP + 10.8MP + 10.5MP 48MP + 48MP + 64MP 12MP + 50MP 50MP + 13MP
Front Camera 50MP 10MP + 10MP 10MP + 10MP 32MP + 20MP 10MP 32MP
Video Recording Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
IP rating Not Disclosed Not Disclosed IPX8 IPX4 IPX8 IPX8
Battery 4700 mAh 4400 mAh 4650 mAh 4805 mAh 4000 mAh 4200 mAh
Wireless charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Size (Dimensions) 74 x 7.1 x 171 MM 143.2 x 4.2 x 158.4 MM 150.2 x 5.1 x 155.2 MM x x INCHES 71.9 x 6.9 x 165.1 MM 74 x 7.3 x 171.3 MM
Weight 199 G 215 G 257 G 245 G 187 G 188 G
ASIN B0F68G1YR8 B0D7V1Q183 B0D4F9DKBF B0D5QYH47R
Operating System Android 15 OneUI 8 (Android 16) Android 14 Android 13 (OxygenOS 13.2) Android 14 Android 14
Release Date 2025 2025 2024 2023 2024 2024
First Reviewed Date 20/05/2025 17/07/2025 03/09/2024 19/10/2023 10/07/2024 09/08/2024
Resolution 2992 x 1224 2184 x 1968 2076 x 2152 2240 x 2268 2640 x 1080 2640 x 1080
HDR Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz
Ports USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 MediaTek Dimenisty 7300X
RAM 16GB 12GB, 16GB 16GB 16GB 12GB 8GB
Colours Pantone Rio Red, Pantone Cabaret, Pantone Mountain Trail, Pantone Scarab Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jet-black, Mint Obsidian, Porcelain Green Silver, Yellow, Blue, Mint Koala Grey, Beach Sand, Spritz Orange
Stated Power 68 W 25 W
Dell Launches New Gear for Clearer Calls and Meetings

Dell Launches New Gear for Clearer Calls and Meetings

Byte-Sized Brief

  • Wired USB-A headset with rotating mic.
  • Speakerphones offer AI-powered noise canceling.
  • Soundbar attaches magnetically to dozens of displays.

Dell just launched a lineup of audio devices built for people who spend a lot of time on video calls or in meetings. The new gear includes a plug-and-play wired headset, two speakerphones (one wired and one wireless), and a magnetic conferencing soundbar designed to blend into your setup without taking over your desk. Each product is made to improve clarity, reduce background noise, and play nicely with the software you already use, like Microsoft Teams and Zoom.

If your home office gets noisy or your calls need a quality boost, these are worth a look. The wired headset looks basic but includes passive noise cancellation and a mic that rotates for left or right side use. The speakerphones use AI-based noise cancellation to pick up voices clearly, even a few feet away. And the soundbar, which magnetically attaches to most Dell monitors, offers custom EQ settings and app controls.

The Bottom Line

Dell just launched new audio devices: a wired headset, AI-powered speakerphones, and a magnetically attached soundbar. These are designed to make meetings clearer and calls less distracting.

Electric Cooler vs. Ice Cooler: I Camped With Anker’s Solix EverFrost 2 and an RTIC Ice Box to See Which Is Better

Electric Cooler vs. Ice Cooler: I Camped With Anker’s Solix EverFrost 2 and an RTIC Ice Box to See Which Is Better

Keeping drinks and food cold while camping can be a challenge, especially in the summer. Though a portable power station hooked up to a minifridge can help, it’s not the most power-efficient option compared with either an electric cooler or a traditional icebox. I set out to test a “regular” icebox-style cooler — specifically, RTIC’s icebox — against Anker’s new Solix EverFrost 2 to see how it would fare in real-world use against the best coolers on the market. To begin testing, I picked up two coolers, a shameful number of cans of soda, a thermometer, and several large bags of ice and took my family on a camping trip.

Here’s what I discovered during my testing, about cooler performance, longevity, cooling capability and portability. 

Electric vs. traditional ice cooler compared 

Product Name

Anker Solix EverFrost 2 (40L)

RTIC 45 QT Ultra-Tough Cooler

Internal size

42 quarts

45 quarts 

Empty weight

50.71 pounds

29.5 pounds

Battery

288Wh battery 

N/A 

Runtime

52 hours (one battery), 4.3 days (dual battery)

5 days (following cooling tips)

Recharge

Solar, car, wall outlet, USB-C

N/A

Temperature range

-4 degrees to 68 degrees Fahrenheit

Variable 

Price (MSRP)

$900

$300 

Electric coolers:

Electric coolers are basically small, battery-powered refrigerators. They use a cooling element to lower the temperature in their compartments, as opposed to traditional ice. They can hold ice but the main attraction is you don’t need it to keep your food and drinks cool. 

Pros 

  • No ice needed
  • No mess/melted ice 
  • Built-in additional features like battery charging

Cons

  • They only last as long as the battery
  • Very heavy
  • Extremely expensive

Who should use it: People who are going on longer trips and want to keep food and drinks cold and fresh will prefer an electric cooler. Electric coolers can be temperature-controlled. They don’t rely solely on ice so if you want food kept at a certain temperature, that’s possible as long as you have a battery or input source. 

insert-4

The RTIC and Solix 2 coolers loaded up in the back of an SUV. 

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

Regular coolers:

A traditional cooler, or ice chest, is an insulated container whose sole function is to hold food, drinks and ice to keep everything cold. Most of the space inside a cooler can be used for food/drink/ice storage. Unlike an electric cooler, no electricity is required. 

Pros 

  • Lighter than electric counterparts
  • Less expensive than electric
  • Cools down food faster

Cons

  • Relies on ice for cooling
  • Water from melted ice can be messy
  • Open food containers can contaminate cooler ice/water

Who should use it: People who will be off-grid will prefer an ice chest because ice is generally available in most places. You should be able to pick it up in just about any supermarket or gas station and as long as the cooler is well-insulated, it should last for hours, if not days. Electricity can be a bigger ask when camping and may require a hefty portable power station or multiple backup batteries.

Anker Solix EverFrost 2 electric cooler vs. RTIC Ultra Tough QT-45 

insert-3

The RTIC cooler (left) and Solix EverFrost 2 (right) next to each other. The size is about the same, but the EverFrost 2 weighs more. 

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

Design and features

The 40-liter EverFrost 2 cooler Anker sent me to test is pretty chunky, although it’s quite a bit smaller than the 58L model that comes with two compartments. With the size in mind, I wanted to test it against a cooler with a similar capacity. I landed on the RTIC Ultra-Tough QT-45 cooler because its capacity so closely resembles the Anker. In terms of 12-ounce cans of soda, the RTIC cooler can hold around 50 cans with ice, while the Anker can hold up to 60 cans. The RTIC cooler has more length but slightly less width and depth than the Anker, likely because of its 2.8 inches of closed-cell foam insulation. 

In addition to … you know … being a cooler, the Anker Solix EverFrost 2 has a few extra features you won’t find in ice coolers. Notably, the battery on the cooler can be used to charge other devices if you need to, such as phones, tablets and handheld gaming consoles. Also, the Everfrost has a pop-up handle/table you can use for extra table space when you’re at your picnic or campout. The Anker cooler also has an interior light for finding what you’re looking for in the dark.

insert-8

The EverFrost 2 has a pull out handle that can double as tray table. 

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

If I’m being completely honest, the pop-up handle seems super flimsy. I was nervous about using it to roll the cooler around fully loaded but the picture on the website shows it being used that way, so I figured it would be fine. I figured correctly, much to my surprise.

I used the single-battery version of the cooler. You can buy extra batteries for $220 and you can insert a second one to make the cooler last longer. According to Anker, it can run for 52 hours with one battery and up to 4.3 days with two batteries. That said, I wanted to evaluate the cooler in its most common configuration, so I stuck with the default battery. 

insert-11

The EverFrost 2 comes with a single battery with 52 hours of runtime on paper but you can pick up a second one to have it last for 4.3 days. 

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

Testing the weight

To test the weight, I used 12 oz cans of soda and put 50 cans in each cooler. Then I added all the ice the RTIC cooler would handle. The EverFrost 2 has a dry weight of about 50 pounds, while the RTIC cooler checks in at about half of that. Add in the ice, and the coolers checked in at 96.6 pounds for RTIC versus 78.8 pounds for the EverFrost 2. In retrospect, I could have guessed that. Because I added the same number of cans to both coolers, the only variable was the ice itself.

img-7276

The Anker Solix EverFrost 2 loaded up with 60 cans of soda. 

Adam Doud/CNET

To fit 50 cans into the RTC, I had to stuff them in a bit, and they just barely made it. On its site, RTIC claims the cooler can handle 60 cans, so it was a little disappointing to see it not live up to this. Because of that, I was only able to manage around 10-12 pounds of ice into the cooler. Take a 25-pound weight differential and subtract the ice weight and there you go. 

In this particular case, the weight at capacity — how much the cooler weighs when full — is the more important figure. EverFrost 2 with its cooling hardware outweighs (by almost double) the RTIC cooler, even with ice. When they’re full, a 15 to 20 pound difference isn’t that significant, but the EverFrost 2 is still almost 20% heavier. In this case, the ice cooler wins the fight, although the built-in wheels on the EverFrost 2 cooler make it easier to move around (but not to lift into or out of a vehicle). 

insert-5

The EverFrost 2 has wheels that make it more portable than the RTIC.

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

Fast cooling test

We’ve all been there. You’ve got a party starting later that day and you forgot to throw the drinks into a cooler, so now you have to hustle. Which will cool down your drinks faster? In order to test this, I set both coolers out and open to warm to room temperature, or about 70 degrees Fahrenheit. Similarly, I had several cases of soda sitting out, also warming to room temperature. Once both the cooler interiors and soda warmed up, I loaded up both coolers with those 50 soda cans and tossed 10 to 12 pounds of ice into the RTIC cooler. 

Additionally, I opened a can of soda in the middle of the top layer and bottom layer of cans. From there, I used a temperature gun to take readings. The EverFrost 2 cooler has a digital readout of the temperature on the inside of the cooler. To measure the RTIC cooler, I measured the temperature of the inside wall. I also measured the temperature of each can of soda. I did this every 15 minutes for five hours and the results are recorded in the chart below:

screenshot-2025-03-28-154223

Adam Doud/CNET

As you can see, although the EverFrost 2 got colder faster, the cans themselves did not follow suit. In fact, the RTIC ice cooler cooled both the cooler and the cans faster than the electric cooler. 

The one issue I had with the RTIC was after about two and a half hours, the water collected at the bottom of the cooler overflowed into the bottom can, which spoiled the readings a bit. You’ll notice a sudden downward slope when that happened at 9 a.m. We’ll address that more in a bit.

insert-2

The EverFrost 2 can carry 60 cans of soda compared to 50 in the RTIC. 

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

Longevity 

Another situation you might deal with is camping, and in that case, you’re not going to be worried about cooling down your food and drinks quickly, but how long they will stay that way. To test this, I loaded up both coolers with just 40 cans of soda. I wanted to pack in more ice into the RTIC cooler, and leave room for an internal thermometer to see how long it stayed cold. I tested this for two and a half days, essentially a long weekend trip.

insert-7

The EverFrost 2 has added bulk from the fan and cooling hardware installed. 

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

For this test, I put the Anker cooler into Eco mode and filled up the RTIC cooler with even more ice. This time, I did not open and check the coolers every 15 minutes. I left several hours between checks because when you’re camping, you’re not constantly going into the cooler for everything. Also, this was a multi-day test, and I like to sleep.

However, even when opening the ice cooler several times per day, the ice lasted the entire two and a half days, although it was mostly water by the end of the test. Despite that, the ice cooler stayed below 40 degrees Fahrenheit the entire time. The EverFrost 2 cooler in the meantime, also kept below 43 degrees Fahrenheit the entire time (although the cooler was set for 40 degrees). The EverFrost 2 cooler sat at 13% battery by the end of the test period. So, both coolers performed their required duties for the long term, which was good to see.

insert-10

The EverFrost 2 can be manually set to a certain temperature, unlike the RTIC, which depends on the ice and insulation. 

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

Price 

The 40-liter Anker Solix EverFrost 2 cooler retails for $899, though as of this writing, it’s onsale for $629. There’s also a smaller, 23-liter version available for $799 full price ($599 on sale) and a much larger, 58-liter version for $1,099 ($759 on sale). By comparison, the 45-quart RTIC cooler I tested costs around one-third that price, at $300 (currently discounted to $239). Yes, you get a lot of bells and whistles in the EverFrost 2 cooler: the bottle opener, the extra table space, the wheels, the cleaner setup and storage. However, one has to wonder if that’s worth the price. Anker isn’t exactly reinventing the wheel here. It’s just a different type of wheel.

insert-1

There are plenty of input and output options on the EverFrost 2.

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

Electric cooler vs. normal cooler: Which should you buy? 

The key argument in favor of the electric cooler is the lack of mess — there’s no ice or ice water to deal with for example. Everything you need to keep cool fits inside the cooler and there’s no need to leave room for ice. Plus, despite a slightly smaller footprint, it actually has more capacity for soda cans — 60 as opposed to the RTIC’s 50, despite the company claiming otherwise. Everything you need to get the EverFrost 2 cooler to do its job is self-contained (you don’t have to run to the store to get ice). There’s also the mobility offered by the wheels.

The adjustability of the EverFrost 2 cooler is also nice. I remember a few times when I would head out camping and find that some of the food was ruined because the ice was too cold, or something leaked into the water, and you had to wholesale replace the ice. That won’t happen here. If anything leaks, it’s just a matter of cleaning it out and putting everything back. Plus, you can adjust the temperature to be slightly above freezing if you don’t want everything to be literally ice cold.

insert-9

You can recharge the EverFrost 2 with solar panels, a car charger and power outlet. 

Adam Doud/ Zooey Liao/ CNET

On the other hand, the EverFrost 2 is expensive and none of those things really justify the extra money in my mind. Of course, your mileage may vary. But if you’re wondering which cooler I’ll recommend for your next camping trip, it’s the RTIC cooler. Electrification is pretty cool and you can’t deny the fact that the EverFrost 2 cooler is handy. But for cooling things down fast and keeping them cool, the old school RTIC cooler works just as well as new school, and for a third of the price and 20% less weight. 

What are the disadvantages of thermoelectric coolers?

The biggest disadvantage of a thermoelectric cooler is its weight. In this scenario, the electric cooler has a dry weight twice that of the ice cooler. Even factoring in the weight of the ice, they’re still about 20 pounds apart, favoring the ice cooler.

The other main disadvantage is the electricity required. Once an electric cooler runs out of battery, you can add ice to it to make it last longer. However, then you’re missing the point of having an electric cooler.

How long will ice last in a regular cooler?

The duration that ice can last in a normal cooler depends greatly on how often it is opened. Every time you open a cooler, you’re releasing cool air and letting in warmer air, which will melt more ice. During testing, a cooler opened every 15 minutes lost most of its ice within hours. On the other hand, when the cooler was only opened a few times per day, ice lasted for over 2.5 days (although much of it had melted by then)

Can electric coolers run on batteries?

The Anker Solix EverFrost 2 cooler runs on built-in batteries. You can have a single battery or a double battery configuration, which costs more. How long the battery lasts depends on several factors, such as the cooler’s mode, how often it is opened and how much it is holding. On paper, you can expect 52 hours with a single battery on the 40L EverFrost 2 and 4.3 days with a dual battery. 

3.3′ Amazon Basics USB-A 3.0 High-Speed 4.8Gbps Extension Cable

3.3′ Amazon Basics USB-A 3.0 High-Speed 4.8Gbps Extension Cable

Woot! has 3.3′ Amazon Basics USB-A 3.0 4.8Gbps High-Speed Extension Cable (Male to Female Gold-Plated Connectors, Black) on sale for $2.80. Shipping is free for Amazon Prime Members (must login with your Amazon account and select a shipping address in order for Woot to apply free shipping) or is otherwise $6 per order.

Thanks to Deal Hunter jk68125 for sharing this deal.

Product Details:

  • 3.3-foot USB 3.0 A-male to A-female high-speed extension cable.
  • Extends a USB connection from a computer; ideal for printers, cameras, mice, and other USB computer peripherals.
  • Corrosion-resistant, gold-plated connectors for optimal signal clarity.
  • Shielding protects against noise, minimizing interference for a clear signal.
  • Uses less power, but has increased power output (up to 4.8 Gbit/s); 10X faster compared to USB 2.0.
  • 3.3-foot-long (1.0 meter) USB 3.0 A-Male to A-Female high-speed extension cable.
  • Features shielding that provides protection against noise from electromagnetic and radio-frequency signals, keeping your signal clear with less loss of bandwidth for higher performance.
  • 4.8Gbit/s data bandwidth.
Best Graphics Cards for PC: Nvidia, AMD, Intel

Best Graphics Cards for PC: Nvidia, AMD, Intel

If you have deep pockets, or you can find a good deal, you could make the bump to the RTX 5080 (8/10, WIRED Recommends), starting at around $1,500. It’s capable of high-refresh 1440p gameplay in the sort of titles people play regularly, like Fortnite and Helldivers 2, while being able to leverage frame generation and DLSS 4 to make 4K gaming a possibility in some titles.

Unfortunately, unless someone finds one behind a shelf in a warehouse, the Founders Edition we reviewed is likely already sold out.

With that in mind, I’d recommend the Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5080 OC. I got to spend time with the RTX 5070 Ti (8/10, WIRED Recommends) version of the card, and I was impressed with its performance, build quality, and efficient cooling despite the relatively compact size. Best of all, you get Asus’ top-notch overclocking expertise, tuning your card to get the most out of it.

I’ve spotted it in stock fairly consistently, and although it’s over MSRP, so are basically all of the other RTX 5080s at the moment. This one is sitting near the bottom of the group in terms of price, while still offering important upgrades.

Sonus Faber Concertino G4 review: the bookshelf-speaker dragon I’ll be chasing for decades to come

Sonus Faber Concertino G4 review: the bookshelf-speaker dragon I’ll be chasing for decades to come

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Sonus Faber Concertino G4: Two-minute review

The Sonus Faber Concertino G4 are a very posh set of passive bookshelf speakers. That poshness isn’t just imbued by the colour palette and material choices that define their physical form, even though they do help a bit. Nor is that poshness fully explained by the not-inconsiderable $5,000 / £4,625 / AU$9,495 price point, though, again, that cost does its own fair share of heavy lifting on that front.

The poshness of these posh speakers comes, in my opinion, from Sonus Faber’s dedication to detail. So much attention has been paid to the design, construction, and resulting sound of these speakers, creating an experience arguably greater than the sum of its parts.

Product has been added to your cart