Anker Nebula Mars II Pro Review: Petite Portable Projector Performs Proficiently

Anker Nebula Mars II Pro Review: Petite Portable Projector Performs Proficiently

anker-mars-ii-pro-19-of-11

The Nebula Mars II Pro by Anker is a cute, tiny portable projector.

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Anker’s Nebula Mars II Pro is a surprising little portable mini projector. And I do mean little. It’s small enough to hide completely under a six-pack of Coke. With built-in streaming and a battery good for around three and a half hours of projection, the Mars II Pro is a great companion for a movie night in the backyard or somewhere farther afield. And in addition to being a projector, it’s also a big Bluetooth speaker.

Like


  • Compact size


  • Built-in battery lasts up to 3.5 hours


  • Surprisingly loud speakers

Don’t like


  • Worse brightness and contrast than home projectors


  • Inaccurate color


  • Limited app store


  • Requires charging brick

Video quality will be good enough for many viewers, but compared with a similarly priced home projector it’s far dimmer, with worse contrast ratio and color accuracy. Compared with other tiny, battery-powered projectors however, the image is very watchable and speakers sound surprisingly powerful. 

The main reason to get the Mars II Pro is if you want ultra-portable video, especially outdoors. It’s easy to put near a wall or screen and stream some Netflix within minutes, anywhere. If you plan to use it regularly in the same room inside, however, you’re probably better off with a more traditional projector.

Editor’s note, Dec. 1: Due to its performance, size and price, we’re giving the Nebula Mars II Pro our Editors’ Choice award as our favorite portable projector. While there are newer portable mini projectors that are brighter and easier to use, the ones that outperform this Anker — like the Xgimi Halo Plus — are also more expensive. The Mars II Pro is a great all-around projector for the price.

Basic specs

  • Native resolution: 1,280×720 pixels
  • HDR-compatible: No
  • 4K-compatible: No
  • 3D-compatible: No
  • Lumens spec: 500
  • Zoom: None
  • Lens shift: None
  • Lamp life (Normal mode): 30,000 hours

The Mars II Pro is smaller than you might think. It would fit easily inside any backpack with plenty of room to spare for a water bottle, hoodie or camera. Anker could have made the carrying strap out of cheap-feeling plastic, but has a faux-leather top and is soft underneath. It’s nice to touch.

There are buttons on the top for all the basic functions, but no controls for zoom or focus. This is logical since there’s no zoom and focus is automatic. An integrated slide-open lens cap also turns the projector on and off.

To get a 100-inch image, the Mars II Pro needs to be about nine feet from the screen. Resolution is 720p, which is pretty low for a projector these days and lower than the competing ViewSonic M2, which is 1080p. The LED lamp is rated at 30,000 hours. 

Max brightness is a claimed 500 lumens. I measured about 37 nits, which calculates out to about 337 lumens. For comparison, the ViewSonic M2 produces 349 lumens by my measurements, while the slightly more expensive, but far less portable, Optoma HD146X puts out around 1,146. 

Anker claims the internal 12,500-mAh battery is good for about three and a half hours viewing time, and about that long to charge back up again. If you keep it in the high brightness mode, that drops to one and a half hours. If you’re just using the Mars II as a Bluetooth speaker, Anker claims about 30 hours for audio-only playback.

Though not specifically mentioned as a feature by Anker, some apps treat the Mars II Pro as a mobile device, so you can actually download shows to its 8GB internal storage. 

anker-mars-ii-pro-15-of-11

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Connectivity and convenience

  • HDMI inputs: 1
  • USB port: 1 
  • Audio input and output: 3.5mm output
  • Digital audio output: None
  • Wi-Fi: 802.11a/b/g/n
  • Remote: Not backlit

There is one HDMI input, which is plenty on a projector like this. The USB port lets you stream content from a USB memory stick, or you can charge a device (like your phone), using the Mars II Pro’s beefy battery. 

That’s it for physical connections, other than the power port, which requires a separate power brick. That’s a bummer: I’m a hardliner “everything portable should charge via USB.” If you want to charge the projector away from home, you’ll have to pack the brick too.

The Mars II Pro’s runs Android 7.1, which puts all the streaming capability inside the PJ. So all you need is to tether the projector to your phone or connect to some available Wi-Fi. 

You don’t get the full Google Play Store, however, or even Android TV. Instead, it’s Aptoide, a sort of culled or curated version of the Play Store. It’s a bit of a liability with the ViewSonic M2, and it’s no better here. There’s Netflix, YouTube, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, Disney Plus and others you may or may not recognize. There’s HBO Nordic and HBO Go, but no US HBO or HBO Max. Chromecast is not supported. Overall it’s not bad, but you might not be able to find every service you’re used to.

The remote is wafer thin, but not backlit. That’s fine because you’re probably not going to use it. Instead, there’s the Anker Connect app (Android and iOS), which connects easily and does all the same things. In fact, some of the apps actually require the app. Control in the projector’s menus works fine, but it’s a bit clunky in the Netflix app for instance. Not a big issue, but it could be smoother.

There are two side-firing 10-watt speakers and a rectangular passive radiator in the front. That doesn’t sound like much, but it’s fairly loud and the sound quality is better than I expected from such a small device. This is one of the few projectors I’ve actually turned down to achieve a normal listening level.

anker-mars-ii-pro-20-of-11

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Picture quality comparisons

I compared the Mars II Pro to the ViewSonic M2, another portable projector, and the Optoma HD146X, a traditional plug-in PJ. The M2 is very similar to the Anker, can run off a battery and also runs apps from the Aptoide store. The Optoma is a very different projector, and only a direct competitor in one sense: price. 

I have a feeling the Mars II Pro might attract the attention of someone not typically interested in projectors, so the Optoma is here as an example of what similar money can get you in a non-portable, standard projector. I connected these via a Monoprice 1×4 distribution amplifier and viewed all on a 102-inch 1.0-gain screen.

anker-mars-ii-pro-13-of-11

Top view with carrying strap

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

First up is brightness. The M2 and Mars II are remarkably similar. Their light outputs and contrast ratios are basically identical. In both cases, this amount is “fine.” Considering the size and their ability to run off batteries, somewhere around 300 lumens is acceptable. When creating a 100-inch image that equates to about 37 nits. That’s enough for a watchable, albeit dim, image. You’re better off moving the Anker closer, which will create a smaller but brighter image.

The Optoma, on the other hand, is significantly brighter than either one. On a same size screen I measured over 127 nits, which is over five times brighter than the Mars II. The Optoma is much more watchable at 100 inches. And if you use the Optoma’s most color accurate mode, it’s still twice as bright as the other two. 

And we definitely need to talk about color. The Mars II Pro has some of the least accurate colors of any projector I’ve ever reviewed. Blue is the only color out of the three primary and three secondary colors that is accurate. Green is oversaturated. Yellow isn’t but is quite greenish-yellow. Magenta is oversaturated and too blue. The result looks like you’ve got the color control a few ticks above where it should be. It’s not weird, per se, and overall it still looks better than the M2, but overall it’s definitely more Speed Racer than The Grand Budapest Hotel. 

Side by side with the Optoma, it’s night and day. Or at least Technicolor and Kodachrome. The Optoma isn’t super accurate itself, and actually errs on the side of being undersaturated, but its colors look far more natural than the Anker.

Unlike the Optoma, the Mars II doesn’t have extensive picture settings. It has two. You can adjust the color temperature: Normal, Cool and Warm, and even the most accurate (Warm) is still way too cool. You can adjust the lamp settings: Standard, Battery and Auto. Standard is its brightest. Battery is dim but gets you that three-plus hour view time. Auto switches between the two other modes depending on whether or not the projector is plugged in. That’s it. No brightness, contrast, tint. One result is that you can’t adjust contrast to restore clipped details in bright whites.

anker-mars-ii-pro-12-of-11

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Contrast ratio, like the brightness, is acceptable given the category. I measured an average of 354:1 across all modes. That seems low, and it is, but the majority of sub-$1,000 projectors are only two or three times that. The high end of that performance range, the BenQ HT2050A is 2,094:1. The ViewSonic is basically the same as the Anker, at 376:1. The Optoma is 568:1. 

The Anker’s image lacks punch but not as much as you might think. In fact, because the Anker’s black level is a little lower than the M2 it looks a little better. The M2 is very slightly brighter, which isn’t noticeable. That black level is even lower than the Optoma, but that projector is so much brighter this edge isn’t relevant. 

Lastly we come to detail. Both the M2 and HD146X are 1080p to the Anker’s 720p. On a 100-inch screen this is most noticeable if you’re close enough to notice the individual pixels, which are fairly large. If you shrink the image down to 60-80 inches, it looks detailed enough that it doesn’t look soft. 

Conclusion

Honestly, I wasn’t expecting much from the Mars II Pro. I’ve been underwhelmed with most battery-powered portable projectors I’ve reviewed. I’ve also found that companies not known for video gear tend to miss some important things when it comes to projectors. For instance, picture quality. 

Overall I’m impressed that Anker got a lot right with the Mars II Pro. At least when graded on the curve of price, size and battery power. Compared with an average home projector it comes up short in every performance metric, so If you’re looking for something that will never stray too far from an outlet, you’re better off with a more “traditional” projector. But if you want something portable to watch movies outside, the Mars II Pro has a great design, sounds good, is easy to use and has a more watchable image than the ViewSonic M2 — all for less money.


As well as covering TV and other display tech, Geoff does photo tours of cool museums and locations around the world, including nuclear submarinesmassive aircraft carriersmedieval castlesairplane graveyards and more. 

You can follow his exploits on Instagram and YouTube, and on his travel blog, BaldNomad. He also wrote a bestselling sci-fi novel about city-sized submarines, along with a sequel.

I Couldn’t Wait for Spotify Wrapped—There Is a Better Way to Flex Your Musical Taste

I Couldn’t Wait for Spotify Wrapped—There Is a Better Way to Flex Your Musical Taste

Toward the end of every year, social feeds overflow with Spotify Wrapped flexes—colorful, curated snapshots of our year in music. But I’m too impatient to wait that long. There’s an easier, better way to show off your taste whenever you want.

Spotify Wrapped Ignores How We Actually Discover Music

Spotify’s 2024 Wrapped introduced a feature called Your Music Evolution, in an attempt to chart our music taste month by month.

Music Evolution on a Spotify Wrapped Poster-1

Spotify

But it still misses how we discover music. Think about your last great musical find. Was it during a 2 a.m. rabbit hole session? Or perhaps you discovered your new favorite artist through a friend’s carefully curated playlist, or even from a random TikTok video.

These moments don’t happen on a quarterly schedule, but Wrapped compresses all that into neat, digestible quarterly snapshots. So, you’ll only see the songs and artists you played on repeat. Let’s say you explored 1970s Brazilian funk for some time or had a three-week obsession with Bulgarian choirs. Unless you absolutely binged those genres, they’ll disappear from your year-end summary. Instead, you get your top five artists and a tidy genre pie chart that tells you what you already know.

Top 5 Artists on a Spotify Wrapped Poster-1

Spotify

The once-a-year format also creates another problem: it turns music discovery into a performance. Some people start gaming their listening habits months before November, all in a bid to boost their favorite artists up the charts. Your musical identity deserves better than a once-a-year performance review.

Icebergify Turns Your Listening History Into a Living Map

Icebergify Home Page-1

Instead of reducing your year to a top-five list, Icebergify maps your favorite artists by how popular they are in the world and presents them in the form of an iceberg.

The site pulls your top 50 artists across different periods from Spotify, then checks each one’s popularity based on streams, shares, saves, likes, followers, and the like. The mainstream artists you love are placed at the top of the iceberg, while the less popular ones sink into the lower layers.

You can take the lower layers as proof that you actually dig for music beyond Spotify’s recommendations. It’s why you might see some surprising names, like an artist you barely remember or a super-obscure band, on your iceberg. I take those names as a badge of honor.

Related

7 Ways I’ve Improved My Spotify Recommendations

These are the features and methods I’ve used to make sure that I get better recommendations from Spotify.

Now, your top 50 artists aren’t static. Icebergify analyzes your short-term (about a month), medium-term (six months), and long-term (years) listening history. So you may find an artist from 2021 in your all-time iceberg, waiting to remind you of a musical phase you’d completely forgotten about.

When I checked my Spotify Iceberg at the start of July and again in mid-July, I noticed significant changes in who I was listening to.

Even my supposedly stable all-time iceberg changed a little bit. One artist at the penultimate level was no longer there.

This is something a single end-of-year snapshot just can’t capture.

Icebergify Doesn’t Compromise Your Privacy

Before you worry about handing over your data, Icebergify was built using Spotify’s official Web API, and it’s completely transparent about how it works.

When you connect your account, Icebergify only pulls the basics: your account ID, username, and your top 50 artists and tracks across different timeframes. That’s it. No diving into your private playlists, no access to your personal information, and definitely no data sharing with third parties.

Related

How Much Data Does Spotify Use?

Data rules everything around me.

If you’d like some proof. Just close the site and reopen it. You’ll find that you’ll have to reconnect your Spotify account all over again. That’s because nothing gets stored long-term.

A screenshot showing Icebergify's Spotify Connection Request-1

Also, since the site is open-source, you can easily get in touch with the creator to suggest improvements or contribute new features.

Your Spotify Iceberg Can Also Spark Conversations

Just like Wrapped, sharing your Spotify iceberg gets people talking. When your friends see those mysterious artists floating in your deeper layers, they’ll most likely ask, “Who is this band I’ve never heard of?” Suddenly, you’re talking about how you discovered these less popular artists, recommending them, and just having conversations about music—not just comparing your listening hours.

People who see your Spotify Iceberg can also glean an idea of how you listen to music. If you have a lot of obscure artists, you’re clearly someone who actively hunts for new sounds. And if your friend has a few artists in his lower layers, it might mean that he’s the perfect person to explore new genres with.

Related

This Old Music App Is Still Miles Better Than Spotify For Finding New Music

This decades-old platform still beats Spotify when it comes to music discovery

There’s also something refreshingly human about Spotify Icebergs. When someone shares artists you’ve never heard of, you’ll know it’s the person recommending it, not an algorithm guessing what you’ll like. If it’s someone whose musical judgment you trust, you’ll be more keen to check them out.

Sharing couldn’t be easier, either. On your desktop, just right-click to save the image. On mobile, hold down on the iceberg to save it or take a screenshot if you prefer. Then, you can share it wherever you talk about music.

This mesmerizing factory video shows a mini PC being made from raw aluminum to boxed product

This mesmerizing factory video shows a mini PC being made from raw aluminum to boxed product


  • 22-minute video reveals the incredible work that goes into making Beelink’s tiny desktop replacements
  • There’s a surprising amount of hand-assembly and testing in the mini PC production line
  • There’s narration, no music, just pure factory sounds and impressive craftsmanship

As mini PCs have quietly evolved into compact yet capable machines, many can easily replace traditional desktops.

Once seen as niche gadgets, they now power home offices, media setups, and small businesses, with high-performance processors, expandable memory, and solid I/O support, all packed into tiny, low-noise enclosures.

Robot Vacuum Tips to Help You Keep a Tidy Home (2025)

Robot Vacuum Tips to Help You Keep a Tidy Home (2025)

If you have elected for a robot vacuum with mapping capabilities, it usually gives you the option of a quick mapping run without cleaning. It might seem like a waste, but it does save time in the long run. Use the mapping run to take a quick walk around your house and look for dangling shoelaces, wired headphones, or any long strings or fringes that will trip up the smartest robot vacuum.

And turn on your lights. Your robot might have optical sensors, which require ambient light to operate. If you find that your vacuum is getting stuck a lot, don’t schedule your cleanings at night. (Try 9 am, which is when my vacuum is usually scheduled.) If you have a dog, cleaning right after you leave will also give your pup less time to have an accident on the floor.

Nowadays, your robot vacuum will also ping you if it has navigation issues. In my house, dust often gets on top of the optical sensors, which can be removed by wiping with a soft cloth.

Empty the Bin

Yes, unfortunately, a robot that routinely digs into the yuckiest corners of your house will need a little routine maintenance. More than a few people have complained to me that their robot vacuum doesn’t work and just drags dirt around. If yours is doing this, then the bin is probably full. A robot vacuum’s dust bin is pretty small. Most robot vacuums have a bin size of around 0.6 liters. The dust bin on my Dyson ball vacuum is twice that, and I still need to empty it from room to room.

Dealing With Clogs and Clots

Many robot vacuums now come with tiny tools embedded inside the body of the vacuum that make routine maintenance slightly easier. I also keep scissors and, er, poking tools (a chopstick) on hand for cutting through hair or yarn that has snarled a roller brush or to push an obstinate Lego through the vacuum chute on a self-emptying bin.

I do have to say here that robot vacuums are not unique in this regard; these are all problems that have befallen my handheld push vacuum. I have yet to come across a robot vacuum problem that could not be solved with a few minutes of routine maintenance (well, and the occasional factory reset).

Divide and Conquer

Kids toys on a carpeted floor

Photograph: Carol Yepes/Getty Images

Ideally, you’d automate your robot vacuum’s cleaning cycles, not give it another thought, and come home to a clean house every day thereafter. But as helpful as robot vacuums are, they cannot pick up your kid’s 1,000-piece puzzle set for you or put away the dirty laundry that you’ve left in a pile on the floor.

Testing the top mid-priced options

Testing the top mid-priced options

It wasn’t that long ago that if you wanted high-end features on your phone then you would have to part with sizeable sums to match, but that’s no longer the case. The best mid-range phones continue to raise the bar with innovation at wallet-friendly prices.

While there’s always going to be an audience for the type of high-end handsets that appear in our best smartphones list, the sector that really shows off just how far smartphones have come is at the mid-range level. We are surprised each year with just how much value companies are able to bring to consumers who don’t want to spend more than £699/$699 on their next upgrade.

Nowadays, it’s perfectly acceptable to anticipate a certain standard over overall usability with mid-range phones, such as a reasonably fast chipset and eye-catching display. Beyond that, you have the ability to pick and choose with features you prefer the most. If you’re going to take a lot of pictures then there are definite standouts in that category, just as there are instant winners when it comes to offering massive amounts of battery life. We know as much because we put all of these phones through our rigorous testing process.

Every aspect of a phone is brought under scrutiny when used by one of our tech experts. No stone is left unturned as everything from screen brightness to battery drain when streaming is tested and documented. This ensures that all of our reviews stand as a comprehensive guide to the phone in question, so you won’t be left with any burning questions before deciding which device to buy.

Of course, if you do want to opt for something further down the pricing scale then you may be better suited by our list of the best cheap phones. Alternatively, if you’re looking to narrow your upgrade to a specific brand then we also have the current rankings of the best Samsung phones and the best Google Pixel phones.

For more smartphone related guides, check out our breakdowns of the best camera phone, best gaming phone, best Android phone, best iPhone, best Samsung phone and recommended SIM deals.

Advertisement

Best mid-range smartphones at a glance

SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST

How we test

Learn more about how we test mobile phones

All the devices in this list have been thoroughly tested and used by one of our expert reviewers. We don’t review a phone purely on specs or benchmark scores and we use them as our everyday device for the review period, which is usually at least five days but often a lot more.

When we review a phone our expert will put their personal SIM card into the phone, sync across their most-used apps and log into all their typical accounts. We do this so you’ll feel confident in our review and trust our verdict.

Our review process includes a mixture of real-world tests, along with more than 15 measured tests and industry-standard benchmarks


  • Outlandish performance

  • Exceptionally fast charging

  • Excellent 144Hz display


  • New ‘Deco’ aesthetic

  • No charger included

  • Ads baked into the OS

If you’re looking for a smartphone that brings you as close to the flagship experience as possible without dropping flagship smartphone levels of cash, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is your best option.

The 6.67-inch CrystalRes AMOLED screen is a treat for the eyes with its pixel-packed 1.5K resolution and 144Hz refresh rate, offering superb visuals with inky blacks and vibrant colours helped by support for 12-bit colour depth that makes it fantastic for both binging movies and gaming.

The latter is certainly possible with the 14T Pro, sporting MediaTek’s top-end 2024 chipset, the Dimensity 9300+, with benchmark results competing, if not beating, much of the flagship competition. That’s paired with 16GB of RAM and up to 1TB of storage.

Camera performance is also a treat, sporting a 50MP main, 50MP ultrawide and a 12MP 2.6x telephoto, sharing the main camera with the flagship Xiaomi 14. Its Leica-powered shots look detailed and vibrant, with solid low-light performance to boot.

Throw in a 5000mAh battery that’ll last all day and support for super-fast 120W fast charging that delivers a full charge in 23 minutes and you’ve got a solid all-rounder that’s easy to recommend to most.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10179495


  • Excellent for gaming

  • Brilliant battery life

  • Improved design


  • Ultrawide camera is weak

  • No wireless charging

  • Alert slider could do more

The OnePlus 13R is a solid attempt at a mid-range smartphone that manages to stand out in a busy market with a smattering of genuinely high-end tech.

The display is one of the main reasons to opt for the phone. While the 6.78-inch AMOLED screen isn’t quite as pixel-packed as the flagship OnePlus 13, it boasts the same 120Hz refresh rate and, rather importantly, LTPO 4.1 tech.

Along with the OnePlus 13, it’s one of the first phones on the market to sport the tech, which allows the phone to adjust the refresh rate as you scroll. This means that the screen feels super responsive in use and, crucially, it’s way more battery-friendly.

That also means that, combined with a sizeable 6000mAh silicon carbon battery that’s larger than any other phone in our chart, the OnePlus 13R has superb battery life, easily able to last a day if not two depending on what you’re up to. Even then, with 80W SuperVOOC charging it’ll get a full charge in 52 minutes.

It’s also a decent performer with the 2024 flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, especially when coupled with OnePlus’ various software and hardware optimisations and upgraded cooling mechanisms. It’ll leave practically any other mid-ranger in the dust, both in benchmarks and real-world use.

Elsewhere, it has a solid 50MP primary and 2x telephoto cameras, though the 8MP ultrawide isn’t quite as exciting. It also won’t get as many updates as the Pixel 8a, capping out at four OS upgrades and six years of security patches.


  • Best battery life of any Pixel

  • Clean, more understated look

  • Great camera performance

  • Premium AI features


  • Thick screen bezels look dated

  • No dedicated zoom lens

  • Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips

  • Slow charging

Google’s mid-range ‘a’ series has long dominated when it comes to camera performance, and this year’s Pixel 9a is here to pick up that mantle. 

Sporting a refreshed 48MP camera with a larger sensor than that of the 8a, the main lens does an admirable job in practically any lighting condition. Images are always packed with light and detail, with way more accurate colours than other mid-rangers, especially when it comes to skin tones. 

That said, Google is losing ground to the Nothing Phone 3a Pro and its dedicated periscope lens, with the 9a still relying on Google’s AI-powered Super Res Zoom, but it does a decent enough job when you want to close the gap.

There’s also a 13MP ultrawide lens that, while not as performant as the main lens, is great at capturing scenic vistas during the day. 

It’s not just a great camera phone of course; the Pixel 9a sports its own unique look for the first time, ditching the iconic camera bar for a near-flush camera housing, and it’s powered by the same Tensor G4 chipset as the flagship too. 

Throw in an AI-infused stock Android 15 experience with seven years of OS upgrades, all-day battery life and a solid 6.3-inch screen, and it becomes hard to resist. 

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207452


  • Decent telephoto for the money

  • Fresh Essential Key implementation

  • Design still something special


  • New camera module somewhat ugly

  • Performance not outstanding for the money

  • Sluggish camera app

The Nothing Phone 3a Pro is the latest mid-ranger from startup Nothing, and it comes with quite the surprising feature considering its £449 price point: a 3x periscope camera. All other zoom lenses at a similar price point are fixed telephoto snappers locked at 2x, whereas the 3a Pro’s OIS-enabled snapper can deliver rich and sharp images at the 10x mark and beyond.

The primary 50MP camera also delivers performance above what you’d expect for the price, utilising Google’s Ultra XDR magic to boost the dynamic range of shots to deliver stunningly rich and vibrant results. However, it’s let down by a weak 8MP ultrawide that can’t quite match the performance of the other lenses.

It’s not just a great camera phone, either; it’s also one of the more unique-looking phones on the market. Its transparent glass rear shows stylised cables and other internal components, along with Nothing’s signature Glyph LED tech. That look also translates to the software in the form of the heavily stylised Nothing OS 3.1.

What it isn’t, however, is a powerhouse. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 is fine for day-to-day tasks and closely mirrors the performance of the year-old Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, but it’s left behind by the Pixel 8a and Poco X7 Pro.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207410


  • Speedy performance from the Snapdragon 8 Elite

  • Big, vibrant 120Hz display with fast response times

  • Proper zoom lens adds versatility to the camera system

  • Battery refills in about half an hour


  • Regular Wi-Fi connection issues

  • Ultrawide camera is poor

  • HyperOS remains a cumbersome Android skin

  • 120W charging doesn’t quite charge as fast as expected

If you’re after the best performance possible without spending flagship prices, look no further than the Poco F7 Ultra

The Poco F-series has always led the way in performance in the mid-range space, but this year’s Ultra model takes things a step further with the inclusion of the Snapdragon 8 Elite. That’s the most powerful chipset on the market at the moment, and the chipset of choice for practically every flagship Android phone on the market.

As such, the Poco F7 Ultra can handle practically anything you can throw at it, delivering faster speeds and better gaming performance than any other phone mentioned in our chart in both benchmark tests and real-world use. If you’re a keen mobile gamer wanting to get the most out of your smartphone, this should be of serious consideration.

It’s not just a powerhouse either; it sports a 6.7-inch 120Hz AMOLED screen with a pixel-packed WQHD+ resolution – the same as the top-end Galaxy S25 Ultra – and a 5300mAh battery that’ll keep you going all day without much complaint. 

If you want a super-fast phone for as little money as possible, the Poco F7 Ultra is the phone to go for. 


  • Sleek, grown-up looks

  • Wonderfully efficient

  • Gorgeous OLED screen


  • AI camera features can leave images feeling quite synthetic

  • MagicOS 9 may be a divisive distro of Android

The Honor 400 Pro may be one of the pricier phones on our list at £699, but if you want a top-notch viewing experience and flagship-level AI smarts, it may well be worth it.

The Honor 400 Pro sports a 6.7-inch curved AMOLED screen that’s every part flagship, with a 120Hz refresh rate, 5000nits peak brightness and advanced eye comfort tech. It makes for a great viewing experience, whether gaming or bingeing a movie.

The main draw of the Honor 400 Pro is its impressive AI capabilities, offering pretty much every AI feature present on the company’s top-end Magic 7 Pro.

That includes both Honor-developed AI features like Magic Portal alongside new Google AI features like Photo to Video, the first smartphone to offer the tech. It’s easily the most versatile phone in this list when it comes to AI.

Elsewhere, the Honor 400 Pro boasts an impressive camera experience headed by a 200MP main camera and flanked by 50MP telephoto and 12MP ultrawide snappers. The hardware is impressive, and Honor uses AI trickery like AI Super Zoom to further boost performance – though results are hit-and-miss.

It’s also a powerhouse with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 that was the flagship chip of choice just a year ago, and with a 5300mAh silicon-carbon battery, it has no issue lasting a day or two on a single charge.

There’s very little to dislike, though again, it’s one of the more premium mid-range options available.


  • A welcome update to the entry-level iPhone

  • All the Apple Intelligence features

  • Nice design for the price

  • Great battery life


  • A large selection of missing features, like MagSafe

  • Single rear camera is a bit limiting in 2025

  • The iPhone 16 isn’t that much more expensive

Until recently, the iPhone 15 sat as our go-to Apple recommendation within this list, sitting right at the ceiling of our cut-off point with a price tag of £699/$699. However, with the iPhone 16e now on the market, Apple finally has a handset that fits more in line with the pricing of most mid-range phones.

While the iPhone 16e doesn’t topple the likes of the Pixel 8a on smartphone photography, or the OnePlus 13R where the display is concerned, its value proposition lies in giving you a high-end iOS experience at a price that’s much cheaper (£200/$200 to be exact) than the iPhone 16.

Despite being the cheapest option in the iPhone 16 range, the 16e still boasts the same A18 Bionic chipset as the standard 16 and the iPhone 16 Plus, so you’re not missing out in terms of day to day performance. Apps load quickly, Apple Arcade titles run beautifully and more. Plus, you’ve got access to Apple Intelligence.

While Apple’s take on AI isn’t worth the upgrade alone at the time of writing, we no doubt anticipate that it’ll be at the heart of Apple’s software strategy in the near future, and the iPhone 16e should get access to those same updates as soon as they become available.

In the here and now though, the iPhone 16e’s allure is still in the sleek nature of iOS and apps like Apple News and Apple TV which are very accessible, beautifully designed and feature-rich. There’s also an abundance of helpful widgets that you can add to your homescreen, and the seamless way in which iPhones interact with other Apple devices is unparalleled in the Android space.

Where the iPhone 16e does suffer is in all of the things it’s missing, including MagSafe compatibility, a second rear-facing camera and Apple’s Dynamic Island, all of which can be found on the iPhone 15 which in turn can be found for not that much more if you know where to look.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207301


  • Gorgeous metal and glass build

  • Lovely screen with slim bezels

  • Long software promise

  • Solid camera performance


  • More expensive than last year

  • Junk macro lens

  • No Galaxy AI-branded features

Some mid-range phones can feel a little bit cheap in the hand – often down to the use of materials like plastic over the metal and glass alternative usually found on truly high-end phones – but Samsung’s Galaxy A56 5G is the polar opposite.

Much like the flagship Galaxy S25, the Galaxy A56 is made from an aluminium frame and a glass rear, instantly making it feel more premium in the hand than the likes of the Nothing Phone 3a Pro and Google Pixel 9a

It’s also impressively slim, measuring in at an increasingly rare 7.4mm thick despite housing a 6.7-inch screen and a large 5000mAh battery that makes it feel great to use, especially combined with the device’s flat edges. 

It’s not just a looker either; the 6.7-inch AMOLED screen is a treat for the eyes, with much slimmer bezels than the competing Pixel 9a, and even with the same triple camera setup as the Galaxy A55, it’s still surprisingly solid in the camera department. 

It’s powered by the mid-range Exynos 1580 that, while not in the same league as the Snapdragon 8 Elite of the Poco F7 Ultra, provides solid everyday performance. That’s backed up by OneUI 7, Samsung’s spin on Android 15, with a 5000mAh battery that won’t struggle to last all day on a charge. 

It’s a solid all-rounder with a premium design that won’t disappoint. 

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207377


  • Feels like a flagship

  • Big camera upgrades

  • Relatively speedy

  • Useful AI features


  • Significant price hike

  • No more SD card support

  • Ultrawide camera isn’t great

As soon as you pick up the Oppo Reno 13 Pro, any sense that this phone feels like anything less than a flagship device simply melts away.

The plastic frame of yesteryear has been replaced by a sturdy glass and aluminium backing, which is then complemented by IP69 dust and water resistance, letting you know that the phone is unlikely to be taken down by the elements anytime soon.

There’s also the super fast MediaTek Dimensity 8350 under the hood, which makes general day-to-day use feel not at all dissimilar to what you’ll find on pricier options within our best smartphones list. If you’re concerned about having a phone that can keep up with the latest games then you might be better off picking up the Poco F7 Ultra, but when it comes to social media, multitasking and more, you won’t be feeling hard done by.

Just like almost every other manufacturer nowadays, Oppo has also made sure to embolden the Reno 13 Pro with plenty of AI features to lure in potential adopters. Thankfully, these features don’t feel half-baked like what we’ve found from Moto AI or Honor AI, Instead providing helpful quality of life concepts such as AI Speak, which can analyse a webpage and read it back to you.

The main 50MP camera can pump out some really great shots under the right conditions, and there’s an 8MP ultra-wide too.


  • Incredibly competitive price for the spec

  • Multi-day battery life

  • Big, bright screen


  • Cameras remain a weak point for Poco

  • HyperOS is packed full of bloatware

There are plenty of great options on this list that excel when it comes to overall camera prowess, battery life and more, but if what you value above all else is day to day speed and super fast processing then the Poco F7 is something of a mid-range powerhouse.

Thanks to a winning combination of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and 12GB RAM to keep it running steady, the Poco F7 features some of the best everyday performance you’re going to find at this end of the market, easily outdoing the Pixel 9a and the Samsung Galaxy A56 in several of our tests. Not only is this great for professionals who quickly dip from one app to another, but also gamers who want a smooth experience with classic titles like Call of Duty Mobile.

Luckily there’s a hefty battery that can keep up with the Poco F7’s ambitions of higher than average processing speeds. Under the hood there’s a 6500mAh cell, and even when pushing the battery with a more intensive day than usual over the course of the review, we still struggled to have it drop below the halfway mark, so it’s hard to imagine not being able to get two days of use at a time unless you’re really going all in on some gaming.

That battery life also goes a long way with the phone’s 6.8-inch AMOLED display. It’s exactly the type of panel that’s a joy to use when it comes to streaming films and TV shows, so if you’re the type of person who prefers to use their phone as their main source of entertainment on a flight or a train journey, then the Poco F7 is a great option to have on your person.

As a final point, even though this is still a mid-ranger, you won’t have much to worry about when it comes to longevity. There’s an official IP68 dust and water resistance rating here, which is always handy for peace of mind, particularly if you’re using your phone whilst on holiday and it accidentally gets drenched by other holidaymakers taking a dive into the nearby pool.

Advertisement

Test Data

  Xiaomi 14T Pro OnePlus 13R Google Pixel 9a Nothing Phone 3a Pro Poco F7 Ultra Honor 400 Pro Apple iPhone 16e Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Oppo Reno 13 Pro Poco F7
Geekbench 6 single core 2226 2185 1652 1157 2283 2116 3311 1350 1401 2094
Geekbench 6 multi core 7227 6357 3801 3281 8033 6519 7973 3830 4269 6294
Antutu benchmark test -2
Max brightness 700 nits
1 hour video playback (Netflix, HDR) 6 % 6 % 1 % 5 % 6 % 4 % 4 % 10 % 5 %
Battery drain 60-min (music streaming online) 1 % 6 %
Battery drain 60-min (music streaming offline) 1 %
30 minute gaming (intensive) 4 %
30 minute gaming (light) 6 % 3 % 6 % 3 % 6 % 7 % 3 % 7 % 5 %
1 hour music streaming (online) 1 %
1 hour music streaming (offline) 1 %
Time from 0-100% charge 23 min 90 min 108 min 72 min 32 min 47 min 105 min 73 min 53 min 40 min
Time from 0-50% charge 9 Min 44 Min 40 Min 12 Min 17 Min 27 Min 24 Min 27 Min 17 Min
30-min recharge (included charger) 47 % 98 % 57 % 82 %
15-min recharge (included charger) 25 % 58 % 22 % 46 %
30-min recharge (no charger included) 34 % 40 % 77 % 55 %
15-min recharge (no charger included) 18 % 22 % 44 % 29 %
3D Mark – Wild Life 4985 2597 6023 4614 2939 3199 4341
GFXBench – Aztec Ruins 92 fps 60 fps 66 fps 25 fps 80 fps 61 fps 60 fps 31 fps 77 fps 61 fps
GFXBench – Car Chase 93 fps 60 fps 79 fps 28 fps 87 fps 61 fps 60 fps 39 fps 84 fps 66 fps

Full Specs

  Xiaomi 14T Pro Review OnePlus 13R Review Google Pixel 9a Review Nothing Phone 3a Pro Review Poco F7 Ultra Review Honor 400 Pro Review Apple iPhone 16e Review Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Review Oppo Reno 13 Pro Review Poco F7 Review
UK RRP £649 £679 £499 £449 £649 £699.99 £599 £499 £649 £389
USA RRP Unavailable $499 $599 $499 Unavailable
EU RRP €799.99
Manufacturer Xiaomi OnePlus Google Nothing Xiaomi Honor Apple Samsung Oppo
Screen Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches 6.3 inches 6.77 inches 6.67 inches 6.7 inches 6.1 inches 6.7 inches 6.8 inches 6.8 inches
Storage Capacity 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB 128GB, 256GB 256GB 256GB, 512GB 512GB 128GB, 256GB, 512GB 128GB, 256GB 512GB 256GB
Rear Camera 50MP + 50MP + 12MP 50MP + 50MP + 8MP 48MP + 13MP 50MP + 50MP + 8MP 50MP + 50MP + 32MP 200MP wide, 50MP telephoto, 12MP ultrawide 48MP 50MP + 12MP + 5MP 50MP + 50MP + 8MP 50MP + 8MP
Front Camera 32MP 16MP 13MP 50MP 32MP 50MP main, 2MP depth 12MP 12MP 50MP 20MP
Video Recording Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
IP rating IP68 IP65 IP68 Not Disclosed IP68 IP68 IP68 IP67 IP69 IP68
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh 5100 mAh 5000 mAh 5300 mAh 5300 mAh 5000 mAh 5800 mAh 6500 mAh
Wireless charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Size (Dimensions) 75.1 x 8.39 x 160.4 MM 75.8 x 8 x 161.7 MM 73.3 x 8.9 x 154.7 MM 77.5 x 8.39 x 163.52 MM 75 x 8.4 x 160.3 MM x x 8.1 MM 71.5 x 7.8 x 146.7 MM 77.5 x 7.4 x 162.2 MM 76.6 x 7.6 x 162.8 MM 77.9 x 8.2 x 163.1 MM
Weight 209 G 206 G 186 G 211 G 212 G 203 G 167 G 197 G 195 G 216 G
ASIN B0D6NMDXY7 B0DSWFHTL2 B0DSG6G62L B0DVZSLDSN B0F43L8Y3C
Operating System Android 14 (HyperOS) OxygenOS 15 (Android 15) Android 15 Android 15 HyperOS 2 (Android 15) Android 15 iOS 18 OneUI 7 (Android 15) ColorOS 15 (Android 15) HyperOS 2 (Android 15)
Release Date 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025
First Reviewed Date 25/09/2024 10/01/2025 10/04/2025 04/03/2025 27/03/2025 21/05/2025 11/03/2025 01/03/2025 25/04/2025 27/06/2025
Resolution 2712 x 1220 1264 x 2780 1080 x 2424 2392 x 1080 1440 x 3200 2800 x 1280 2537 x 1170 1080 x 2340 1272 x 2800 1280 x 2772
HDR Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 60 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz
Ports USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Google Tensor G4 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 A18 Samsung Exynos 1580 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
RAM 12GB, 16GB 12GB 8GB 12GB 12GB, 16GB 16GB 8GB 12GB 12GB
Colours Titan Black, Titan Gray, Titan Blue Astral Trail, Nebula Noir Obsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony Black, Grey Black, Yellow Grey, Black Black or White White, Black, Awesome Graphite, Awesome Light Gray, Awesome Olive and Awesome Pink Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Pink Black, White, Cyber Silver
Stated Power 120 W 80 W 23 W 120 W 45 W 80 W 90 W
How much does a mid-range phone cost?

The team at Trusted Reviews defines mid-range smartphones as any handset costing ideally under £700/$700. We raised our definition in 2022, following a gradual rise in prices in the top end of the market.

Are mid-range phones good?

Over the last few years, the mid-range phone market has blossomed, with key companies including Google, Xiaomi, OnePlus, Oppo and Samsung creating mid-range handsets with features traditionally reserved for flagship devices. Recent highlights have included 5G connectivity, high refresh rate screens and improved rear camera sensors. The team of experts at Trusted Reviews recommend most users consider a mid-range smartphone before investing in a flagship as a result.

Are there 5G mid-range phones?

5G is a given in the mid-range market in 2025 with Samsung, Oppo, Motorola, OnePlus and Google having mid-range phones supporting the connectivity.

Fix Errors on Galaxy Devices

Fix Errors on Galaxy Devices

The Download

  • Restarting your Samsung Galaxy device can often fix the ‘Camera Failed’ error easily.
  • Updating apps and the system software might stop the camera error from happening again.
  • Clearing the camera’s app cache can help make it work better and fix the error.

Samsung Galaxy smartphones and the discontinued Samsung Galaxy digital camera are known for their excellent picture quality. However, like all electronic devices, they can sometimes malfunction. A common issue is the Camera failed error. What causes this, and how can you fix it? There are several potential causes and solutions.

How to Fix the Camera Failed Error in Samsung Galaxy Smartphone Cameras

You may have to try several strategies to fix this camera error. Work through these steps in order to try the simpler solutions first.

  1. Restart your phone. A simple restart can resolve many software-related errors.

    A restart and reset are two very different things. Restarting your phone simply powers it down and then starts it back up. None of your apps, files, or settings will be removed.

  2. Check for system and app updates. An outdated operating system or app can cause this camera error.

  3. Power up in Safe Mode, then check to see if your camera works properly. If it does, the problem could be a third-party app that conflicts with the camera software.

    Restart the phone in regular mode and remove recently installed or updated third-party apps one at a time until the problem is resolved. You may need to restart the phone after removing each app to ensure it’s completely removed.

    Third-party apps are a common cause of the Camera Failed error, so don’t skip this step.

  4. Clear the Camera’s app cache and storage data. Once the cache is cleared, restart the Camera app and test it to see if the issue is resolved.

  5. Remove and then reinsert the microSD card. Occasionally, a Galaxy phone camera may encounter an error reading the SD card, leading to the Camera Failed error. Reformat the card if prompted.

    Reformatting a microSD card erases all data on the card. If there are pictures or apps you wish to keep, transfer these files to your computer using a microSD card reader.

  6. Turn off Smart Stay. This feature uses the selfie camera to monitor your face’s position when you’re looking at the screen for a long time without touching it. Since it utilizes the camera, it can sometimes conflict with the rear camera when Smart Stay is active.

  7. Reset your phone. If nothing has worked up to this point, the last thing to try is a full factory reset. This returns the phone to its factory settings, after which you’ll need to go through the initial setup process again as if it’s a ew device.

    Completing this step will erase everything on your phone, including all apps you’ve added since you first got the device, any downloaded files, and photos and videos stored on the phone. Back up anything you don’t want to lose before starting the factory reset process.

  8. Try customer support. If you’re still getting the error even after resetting the phone’s software, contact Samsung Support for further assistance.

How to Fix the Camera Failed Error in the Samsung Galaxy Camera

Samsung Galaxy cameras can experience the same Camera Failed error as Galaxy smartphones, though some troubleshooting steps differ.

Ensure the camera battery is fully charged before continuing. Some of these steps could take several minutes to complete. If the battery dies during the process, you may encounter other errors and have to start the troubleshooting process over.

  1. Press-and-hold the Power button to turn off the camera. Once it’s off, allow the camera to sit for at least 30 seconds before powering it back on. Many issues that cause software errors can be fixed with a simple restart. 

  2. Shut down running processes that could be causing a camera conflict and then restart the camera.

    To do this, go to Settings > Device care > Memory . Then, tap Clean now.

  3. Reformat the SD card. Occasionally, the Samsung Galaxy camera encounters an error reading the SD card, leading to the Camera Failed error. Reformatting the card may resolve the issue.

    Here’s how: Go to Settings > Storage > Memory > Format SD card.

    A reformat will erase all of its data. If you don’t want to lose the pictures on the card, transfer the files to your computer using an SD card reader before performing a reformat.

  4. Restore the camera to its factory default settings. This option is available in Settings > Apps > Camera > Camera Settings > Reset Settings.

  5. Visit Samsung’s Digital Camera Support page for repair information. At this point, if the camera error remains after resetting the software, reaching out to Samsung is the next best choice.

Causes of the Camera Failed Error in Samsung Devices

This error doesn’t include any other information about why the camera isn’t working correctly. That makes troubleshooting difficult. It’s not impossible to fix, though, since, in most cases, it’s a simple software issue. The error can be caused by an incomplete firmware update, out-of-date third-party apps, or an SD card the camera suddenly doesn’t recognize.

‘Mortal Kombat II’ Is Ready to Be a Bigger, Better Sequel

‘Mortal Kombat II’ Is Ready to Be a Bigger, Better Sequel

Now that the first trailer for Mortal Kombat II dropped earlier this week, director Simon McQuoid’s free to talk about how this follow-up builds on the 2021 reboot.

Talking to IGN, McQuoid opened up on ensuring the second movie delivered on the promise of the first movie, namely having the real fighting tournament that features franchise characters beating the hell out of each other. Said characters include the returning Sonya Blade, Raiden, and Liu Kang, and the newly introduced Kitana, Shao Kahn, and Baraka. Oh, and Johnny Cage, now stepping into the role Cole Young did in the previous movie and operating as a POV character into this krazy, khaotic world full of lizard men, mad scientists, and ageless fighters.

Of these newcomers, McQuoid called them “wild and otherworldly, and when you’ve got characters like that, you have to swing for the fences.” Such swings involve taking the characters to locations from the games like like Hell (where Scorpion resides) and Edenia, the home realm of Kitana, Jade, and Shao Kahn. According to McQuoid, those trips bring “massive scale” to the film, particularly when it comes to the film’s IMAX version. For the format heads, he teased that cut will have “little story moments and little gems for the super fans…that you won’t see in the regular theatrical version. I just wanted to try and innovate and use the format in a way that really makes it a rewarding experience for the audience.”

Speaking of the audience, it made that first Mortal Kombat a big hit for HBO Max and its simultaneous theatrical-streaming release. If there’s any hope of a third movie, it’s entirely up to the folks seeing it, and the film’s been made as a complete experience either way. “There’s a coda, but [New Line] doesn’t expect to make a sequel. We have to earn that right,” said producer Todd Garner. “We’re not going to give you some post-sequence to be like, ‘Oh, this is going to happen in the sequel.’ We’ll do more if we’re given the opportunity, but we don’t want to assume that we can.”

Mortal Kombat II hits theaters October 24.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

“ACEMAGIC Mini Gaming PC: Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD, 4K UHD, WiFi6/BT5.2”: Available now at [price_with_discount]

“ACEMAGIC Mini Gaming PC: Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD, 4K UHD, WiFi6/BT5.2”: Available now at [price_with_discount]

ACEMAGIC is a company established in 2023 that focuses on providing high-quality hardware products, especially in the mini PC industry. Their latest release, the AM08PRO Mini Gaming PC, features an AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX processor with powerful performance for both office work and gaming.

The AM08PRO offers three different modes (silent, auto, performance) for better power saving options. The silent mode is ideal for watching movies and light office work, while the auto mode is suitable for medium office software like 3D viewing. The performance mode is perfect for gaming, making this mini PC versatile for various needs.

In terms of storage, the AM08PRO has enough space for storage expansion up to 64GB and supports dual-channel DDR5 for a smooth working and gaming experience. It comes equipped with a 512GB M.2 2280 SSD with the option to expand up to 2TB by adding an additional NVME or SATA SSD.

The mini PC also features stable connections with the latest WiFi 6 technology for fast and reliable wireless connections. The RJ45 port supports high-speed transmission for efficient downloads, while Bluetooth 5.2 ensures a stable connection with accessories.

Efficient multitasking is made easy with the AM08PRO, as it comes pre-installed with an OS system and has multiple ports for connecting up to three displays simultaneously for improved work efficiency.

Overall, the ACEMAGIC AM08PRO Mini Gaming PC offers powerful performance, customizable modes for different needs, and efficient multitasking options, making it a versatile and compact choice for both work and play.

Price: $599.00
(as of Nov 06, 2024 10:00:26 UTC – Details)

NASA’s new Roman Space Telescope aims to discover 100,000 cosmic explosions

NASA’s new Roman Space Telescope aims to discover 100,000 cosmic explosions

While the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes continue to offer astronomers revolutionary glimpses of our universe, their upcoming sibling may very well upstage them. Scheduled to launch in 2027, NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is designed with a field of view at least 100 times larger than Hubble’s, with the potential to document light from over a billion galaxies over its career. Combined with timelapse recording capabilities, Roman will help researchers to better understand exoplanets, infrared astrophysics, and the nature of dark matter.

But it doesn’t stop there. According to a study published on July 15 in The Astrophysics Journal, Roman is poised to eventually capture an estimated 100,000 celestial explosions over its lifetime. These could include everything from supernovae to hungry black holes, but astrophysicists theorize Roman may potentially even find evidence of the very first stars to ever form in the universe.

This simulation showcases the dynamic universe as NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope could see it over the course of its five-year primary mission. The video sparkles with synthetic supernovae from observations of the OpenUniverse simulated universe taken every five days (similar to the expected cadence of Roman’s High-Latitude Time-Domain Survey, which OpenUniverse simulates in its entirety). On top of the static sky of stars in the Milky Way and other galaxies, more than a million exploding stars flare into visibility and then slowly fade away. To highlight the dynamic physics happening and for visibility at this scale, the true brightness of each transient event has been magnified by a factor of 10,000 and no background light has been added to the simulated images. The video begins with Roman’s full field of view, which represents a single pointing of Roman’s camera, and then zooms into one square.
This simulation showcases the dynamic universe as NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope could see it over the course of its five-year primary mission. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and M. Troxel

Galactic ‘gold mine’

“​​Whether you want to explore dark energy, dying stars, galactic powerhouses, or probably even entirely new things we’ve never seen before, this survey will be a gold mine,” Benjamin Rose, a physicist at Baylor University and the study’s lead author, said in a statement.

Rose and colleagues reached their estimate after running a simulation of the Roman’s High-Latitude Time-Domain Core Community Survey. Once in place, the space telescope’s survey is designed to scan a single, vast portion of the universe every five days for two years. Astronomers will compile all of those snapshots into what amounts to cosmic movies, then document every kind of energy blast they find.

“By seeing the way an object’s light changes over time and splitting it into spectra—individual colors with patterns that reveal information about the object that emitted the light—we can distinguish between all the different types of flashes Roman will see,” explained Rebekah Hounsell, a study co-author and assistant research scientist at the University of Maryland-Baltimore County.

An artist's illustration of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope once deployed into orbit. Credit: NASA
An artist’s illustration of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope once deployed into orbit. Credit: NASA

Peering back in time

The majority of events will likely be various types of exploding stars, or novae. The telescope’s survey itself is particularly oriented to detect a rarer class of stellar bursts known as Type Ia supernovae. These cosmic mileage posts help researchers measure cosmic distances and analyze the universe’s expansion rate. As NASA explains, understanding the speed of expansion amid various epochs can key astronomers into dark matter’s behavior. Based on this  study’s simulation, Roman’s handlers can expect to find about 27,000 Type Ia supernovae. That’s more than 10 times the number collected by all previous surveys.

Peering further into the depths of space also means Roman will glimpse further back into time than any telescope before it. Most supernovae detected so far by astronomers have occurred within the last 8 billion years. Roman is expected to push that timeline back to over 10 billion years ago— and possibly even as far as 11.5 billion years.

“Filling these data gaps could also fill in gaps in our understanding of dark energy,” said Rose. “Evidence is mounting that dark energy has changed over time, and Roman will help us understand that change by exploring cosmic history in ways other telescopes can’t.”

The simulation dataset created by Rose’s team isn’t limited to their own study. According to Hounsell, other experts can use it to develop their own machine-learning algorithms to comb through Roman’s gigantic troves of data for their own subjects.

“While searching for type Ia supernovae, Roman is going to collect a lot of cosmic ‘bycatch’—other phenomena that aren’t useful to some scientists, but will be invaluable to others,” explained Hounsell.

This infographic describes the High-Latitude Time-Domain Survey that will be conducted by NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. The survey’s main component will cover over 18 square degrees—a region of sky as large as 90 full moons—and see supernovae that occurred up to about 8 billion years ago. Smaller areas within the survey will pierce even farther, potentially back to when the universe was around a billion years old. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
This infographic describes the High-Latitude Time-Domain Survey that will be conducted by NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. The survey’s main component will cover over 18 square degrees—a region of sky as large as 90 full moons—and see supernovae that occurred up to about 8 billion years ago. Smaller areas within the survey will pierce even farther, potentially back to when the universe was around a billion years old. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

One such phenomena may be multiple kilonovae—gargantuan explosions that result when a neutron star (a leftover supernova core) slams into another neutron star. Astronomers theorize that kilonovae may also occur when a neutron star collides with a black hole. Researchers have only officially ever documented a single such event, but the study’s authors believe the Roman telescope could pinpoint another five of them.

These anticipated discoveries only scratch the surface of what Roman could achieve. However, engineers must first finish the telescope and successfully launch it into orbit. The launch is currently scheduled no earlier than May 2027. NASA’s multibillion dollar budget cuts proposed by the Trump administration may jeopardize the Roman project, despite its potential completion ahead of time and cheaper than expected.

“This is nuts,” former co-chair of Roman’s science team David Spergel told Scientific American earlier this year. “You’ve built it, and you’re not going to do the final step to finish it? That is such a waste of taxpayers’ money.”
However, It’s by no means a death sentence for Roman just yet. As of July 15, Congress was in talks to reject the majority of the White House’s proposed NASA cuts.

 

More deals, reviews, and buying guides

 

Andrew Paul is a staff writer for Popular Science.


CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2025 review

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2025 review

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Ever fancy having a collection of software to help you tackle photo editing, page design, and vector illustrations all under one roof? Well that’s what CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2025 is all about.

It’s part graphic design software, part photo editor, and one of the most comprehensive alternatives to Adobe Photoshop around. We tried out the latest version to see how it compares to rivals.

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2025: Pricing & plans

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2025 during our review

(Image credit: Corel // Future)
  • The Corel suite is cheaper than a lot of the competition, and on top of that, you also have the option of purchasing a licence, if you prefer that over subscribing. The 15-day trial is also welcome
Product has been added to your cart