The OnePlus Nord CE5 is a tempting budget-focused phone – but what’s new compared to last year’s OnePlus Nord CE4?
Aside from the fact that the Nord CE5 is being launched much wider than the CE4, which didn’t launch in the UK or Europe, this year’s smartphone offers an upgraded design, new screen features, and more.
However, there are still a few surprising similarities between the two, and even areas where the year-old Nord CE4 outperforms the CE5, which could affect your buying decision.
We’ve reviewed the OnePlus Nord CE5, but we’ve not yet spent any time with last year’s Nord CE4 given its limited availability. That said, here’s how the two compare on paper, complete with our impressions of the newer model.
Pricing and availability
The OnePlus Nord CE5 is now available for purchase in the UK and Europe, following its announcement in early July 2025. It is priced at £249/€319 with 128GB of storage, with an additional 256GB option available at an extra cost.
Advertisement
The OnePlus Nord CE4, on the other hand, had a much more limited release back in 2024, available only in regions like India in both 128- and 256GB configurations. Neither are available in the US, however, so our American friends should look elsewhere.
The Nord CE5 offers a cleaner look and improved durability
The OnePlus Nord CE5 is a step forward in terms of design – though of course, that’s a matter of personal opinion.
It’s much more minimalistic than last year’s Nord CE4, with flat edges, a completely flat rear and even a flat screen. This is very much on-trend with smartphones in 2025, with the rounded rear and slightly curved screen of the Nord CE4 looking comparatively dated to most.
OnePlus Nord CE5. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
As a result, the Nord CE5 feels more refined and comfortable in the hand, and the addition of an IP65 rating means it’s better protected against dust and water than the CE4, which doesn’t have an official IP rating.
Advertisement
This should make the CE5 a bit more reassuring for everyday use, especially in less-than-ideal conditions – and paired with the phone’s upgraded Aqua Touch 2.0 screen tech, it should be easy to use in the rain too.
The Nord CE5’s screen is brighter and flatter
The Nord CE5 features a flat 6.77-inch FHD+ AMOLED display, while the Nord CE4 has a slightly curved screen of roughly the same size and resolution.
The shift from curved to flat screens changes the look and feel of the phone, with the CE5 offering a more modern, understated look that reduces accidental touches along the sides, which can be an issue with curved screens like that of the Nord CE4.
OnePlus Nord CE4. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
On the other hand, the CE4’s curved screen offers a more immersive wraparound effect that some find visually striking and undoubtedly premium. It’s largely down to personal preference.
Brightness is another area where the CE5 boasts an improvement, offering 1300nits peak brightness compared to the CE4’s 1100nits. That should make the CE5 easier to use in bright light while also making HDR content pop that little bit more than the CE4 – though there isn’t that much in it.
Advertisement
Elsewhere, both displays sport a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling, but the CE5 adds features like Ultra HDR support, the aforementioned Aqua Touch 2.0 and PWM dimming for reduced eyestrain.
The Nord CE5 offers better performance
Performance is another area where the Nord CE5 makes notable strides. It’s powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Apex chipset, paired with 8GB of RAM and either 128- or 256GB of storage, which brings it closer to the Nord 5 in terms of power.
Either way, it’s a big step up from the Nord CE4’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and 8GB, and that should translate to a generally speedier experience largely free of lag and stuttering.
OnePlus Nord CE5. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The Nord CE5 also boasts a 7041mm² CryoVelocity capor chamber cooling system – the largest in its price class according to OnePlus. This should help keep the phone running cool when performing demanding tasks, such as high-end gaming, while reducing the need to throttle the chipset’s power to lower temperatures.
Both offer the same camera hardware
When it comes to the all-important cameras, the Nord CE4 and CE5 are surprisingly similar.
Advertisement
Both phones are equipped with a 50MP main sensor featuring OIS, along with an 8MP ultrawide camera and a 16MP selfie camera on the front. Both phones also support 4K video recording at 60fps, although unlike the full-fat Nord 5, this feature is limited to the rear snappers.
OnePlus Nord CE5. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Instead, much of the differences come down to software improvements. There will likely be differences in performance between the ISPs, with slight variations in elements like colour balance and noise reduction, but there are also features like upgraded live photo smarts that are exclusive to the newer model.
The Nord CE4 has a bigger battery and faster charging – in Europe, anyway
The Nord CE5 does offer a marked improvement in battery life with a whopping 7100mAh cell – but due to EU regulations on battery capacities, it’s not available in Europe. Instead, those in Europe are treated to a much smaller 5200mAh cell – and that makes it smaller than the 5500mAh alternative from the Nord CE4.
OnePlus Nord CE4. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
That’s not the only difference either; the Nord CE4 offers the faster charging of the two phones at 100W, compared to the CE5’s 80W. In practice, this should mean that the Nord CE4 provides a full charge faster than the Nord CE5 despite offering a larger battery.
Advertisement
Early thoughts
The OnePlus Nord CE5 looks to be a big step forward for the CE collection, offering a more modern, flat design and IP65 rating for improved durability. Its brighter, flatter screen and upgraded performance also provide a marked improvement over what’s offered by the older Nord CE4.
While the camera hardware remains largely consistent with the Nord CE4, new software features and improved tuning could translate to a better day-to-day shooting experience.
Interestingly, however, the Nord CE4 boasts advantages when it comes to battery capacity and charge speeds – for those in Europe where the Nord CE5 is limited to 5200mAh, anyway.
That said, we’ll reserve final judgement for once we’ve spent more time with both phones.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Review information
Platform reviewed: Nintendo Switch 2 Available on: Nintendo Switch 2 Release date: June 5, 2025
The conversation around interactive-visit-come-video-game Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour, rather unfortunately, has not been about the game itself. Rather, many players have (rightly so) lamented the fact that this is a paid download rather than a pack-in experience – similar to the likes of Wii Sports or even Astro’s Playroom on PlayStation 5.
That being said, Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour remains one of the top downloads on the Switch 2 eShop – at least here in the UK – so folks are certainly buying it. The question is, then, is it worth the $9.99 / £7.99 you’ll end up paying for it? Well, yes and no.
There are positives to take away from the Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour experience. If you’re a hardware head like me, Welcome Tour presents information about the Switch 2 system in bite-sized chunks of trivia. There are even info booths and quizzes to undertake that highlight specific features, such as HD Rumble and mouse controls. I’m also a fan of the tech demos and minigame challenges that let you try out said features in a practical fashion.
Realistically, though, it’s an experience that only lasts a handful of hours, and rather annoyingly, it could be a more expensive game than its modest price tag lets on. That’s because some of the demos and minigames outright require things like a 4K TV or the Switch 2 Camera.
If you’re shooting for 100% completion, then Welcome Tour assumes you’ve gone all-in on the Switch 2 ecosystem as a whole. This is why I strongly feel the game should have come pre-installed onto your Switch 2 console; having to pay for a game that you might not even get to experience everything in – depending on the hardware you own – is extremely disappointing.
Ins and outs
(Image credit: Nintendo)
Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour is presented as a giant exhibition for the new console. You’ll start by picking your avatar’s appearance simply by plucking them from a queue to the venue; you’re either an extremely tiny human, or the exhibition and its various sections are monolithic in size. I’ll let you decide which is more likely there.
If your objective in Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour is simply to plough through all the areas, then that’s easy enough. You’ll begin on the left Joy-Con 2 controller, and you’re tasked with finding and checking all the components there. That includes things like the analog stick, directional buttons, and magnetic connector.
Once you’ve seen it all, you can unlock the gate to the next area, where you’ll repeat that process. It’s fun at first, but even though it’s a short experience overall, there will be instances where you’ll find yourself pixel hunting while uncovering all the gizmos needed to unlock the next area. That means a lot of running around this isometric exhibition, which can be quite a chore.
Up for a challenge
(Image credit: Nintendo)
To sidestep some of the tedium said exploration can bring, I do encourage you to take things at a measured pace in Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour. Thankfully, there are some distractions to be had in the form of quizzes, minigames, and tech demos.
Quizzes are the most straightforward of the bunch. There are various booths dotted about the exhibits, and talking to the person there will load in some information displays you can read to learn more about various aspects of the Switch 2 ecosystem.
Minigames are a bit more bespoke. Each area will have at least one or two, and most are fun little diversions. You’ll be tasked with a great many things with these, again having something to do with the Switch 2’s capabilities. Examples include using the Joy-Con 2’s mouse to pilot a UFO avoiding spiked balls, and a task where you have to guess the framerate of a ball bouncing across a screen.
Best bit
(Image credit: Nintendo)
Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour’s presentation is really quite charming. Running around on a giant Switch 2 screen or Joy-Con 2 controllers is a novel idea, and I had fun exploring each area to learn more about the console and its accessories.
Finally, there’s the tech demos. These don’t offer much of a challenge and instead showcase various aspects of the Switch 2’s tech. An early example has you shaking the Joy-Con 2 like maracas to demonstrate HD Rumble, while another showcases the handheld’s HDR capabilities, where you can let off fireworks and compare the differences between HDR and SDR color gamuts.
Completing quizzes, minigames, and tech demos will award you with medals, and collecting enough of these will unlock more content, including harder versions of minigame challenges. Some of these were surprisingly tough, too, so you may have your hands full if you’re a completionist.
Though the completionist route is kind of where Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour can potentially fall apart. The game flat out assumes the player has access to a 4K display and accessories like the Switch 2 Camera, as, believe it or not, there are challenges and tech demos related to such items.
Again, this would be slightly less foul were Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour a free inclusion with the console. But as it stands, I would avoid purchasing it even at its modest price if you don’t have a contemporary gaming setup, as you simply won’t be able to enjoy all the content on offer.
Should you play Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour?
Play it if…
Don’t play it if…
Accessibility
Frustratingly, there is absolutely nothing in the way of options for Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour, let alone for accessibility. At the information kiosk in the game’s first area, you can talk to a non-player-character (NPC) there to invert camera controls, and that’s literally it. Nothing for audio, visuals, or alternative control schemes.
How I reviewed Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour
I played Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour for five hours on the Switch 2 system. As the game has strict requirements for which control schemes to use at any given time, I was limited to using the Joy-Con 2 controllers for things like HD Rumble, mouse controls, and more. As for display, I swapped between my LG CX OLED TV and played on the Switch 2 handheld when the game required it.
The Epson Home Cinema 5050UB is a serious home theater projector for serious home theater enthusiasts. It features a motorized lens with horizontal and vertical lens shift, plus ample zoom. Its 4K enhancement technology offers lots of detail. Its biggest benefit over less expensive 4K projectors, however, is an excellent contrast ratio for deep, dark shadows and bright, popping highlights.
Like
Superb overall picture quality
Excellent contrast ratio
Motorized lens
Ample lens shift and motorized zoom
Don’t like
Could be quieter
Chonkers
There are only a few disappointments, and they’re minor. It doesn’t quite have the color or razor-sharp detail of its direct competitor, the LG HU810P. That’s not to say the 5050 isn’t sharp and colorful. It is, just a bit less so — although I liked the Epson’s overall picture quality a lot more than that of the LG. The 5050UB is also an absolute unit, several times larger than most of the projectors I’ve reviewed in the last year (including the LG).
In sum, the Home Cinema 5050UB is an excellent all-around projector that looks fantastic with all content. It offers a significant step up in picture quality over less expensive projectors, like the Optoma UHD35, and costs a lot less than something like the Sony VPL-VW325ES. It even gives its more expensive, laser-powered sibling, the LS11000, a run for its money. More on that below. Overall, the Epson 5050 is my go-to choice for anyone with a dedicated home theater who wants a projector worthy of the space.
Editor’s note, November 2022: For its excellent picture and value, we’re once again giving the 5050 our Editor’s Choice award. While the laser-powered LS11000 offers some additional benefits and performance over the 5050, it’s also a lot more money.
The 5050UB is a 4K- and HDR-compatible projector. As such, it can accept 4K and HDR signals, though keep in mind that no projector can do HDR very well.
Like all Epson projectors the 5050UB uses an LCD light engine, not the DLP that’s found in most other projectors. The ones used on the 5050UB are not technically 4K native resolution. Instead, they’re a technology called “4K enhancement” that “shifts each pixel diagonally to double Full HD resolution,” according to Epson. This is done very quickly, so it’s just a higher-resolution image to the eye. Here’s a deeper dive into the technology. The short version: It looked plenty sharp to me, if not quite as razor-like as the DLP-powered LG; see below for details.
One of the 5050’s most notable features that sets it apart from less expensive projectors is a motorized lens. This offers ±96.3% vertical and ±47.1% horizontal movement, which should be enough to let the 5050 fit in just about any home. There’s also a significant motorized zoom of 2.1x.
Watch this: Six things to know about home theater projectors
Epson claims the 5050UB can produce 2,600 lumens. I actually measured slightly more than that… in the less accurate Dynamic color mode. In the more accurate Bright Cinema mode I measured roughly 192 nits, or about 1,732 lumens. This puts it among the brightest projectors we’ve ever measured.
Lamp life is on the low side. Even in the Eco mode, Epson rates it at up to 5,000 hours. Some projectors of similar brightness we’ve reviewed in the last year were capable of upward of 15,000 hours in their most lamp-conserving modes. That said, 5,000 hours is still over three years of use at four hours a night.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Connectivity
HDMI inputs: two HDMI 2.0
PC input: Analog RGB
USB ports: 2
Audio input and output: No
Digital audio output: No
Internet: LAN
12v trigger: Yes
RS-232 remote port: Yes
Remote: Backlit
Both HDMI inputs are HDMI 2.0 and can accept up to 4K60. As you might expect from its intended use as a projector for a dedicated theater, it lacks an audio out. Epson assumes, rightly in my opinion, that anyone getting a 5050 would have a traditional projector arrangement with either a receiver or at least a soundbar for audio.
Along the same lines, there are lots of control options for home automation systems, including a 12-volt trigger, RS-232 and a LAN port.
The remote is a big boy (just like the projector it controls) and has a pleasant amber backlight. If you have a 2.35:1 screen, as I do, you might reach for this remote for more than just on and off, since you can zoom the projector and fill the screen with 2.35:1 content without getting off the couch. That’s always a bonus.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Picture quality comparisons
LG HU810P
The LG HU810P is the most notable competition for the 5050. They’re the same price but the HU810P uses newer technology, namely two lasers and a phosphor instead of the 5050’s more traditional lamp. I connected both using a Monoprice 1×4 distribution amplifier, and viewed them side-by-side on a 12-foot-wide 1.0-gain screen.
Right off the bat, both are great projectors, but their strengths and weaknesses are almost polar opposites.
As far as light output goes, they’re very similar. In their respective most accurate modes, the LG can do 166.3 nits to the Epson’s 192. Objectively, that’s a fair bit of difference, but subjectively, side-by-side, they both just look bright. So we’ll call that more or less a tie.
Color, though, goes to the LG. The lasers, with help from a phosphor, are absolutely deeper and richer. Throw on some HDR content and the deep crimson reds and vibrant purples are far beyond what the 5050UB can produce. This is sort of like saying a Porsche is slower than a Ferrari, however, since the 5050UB is no slouch in the color department. On its own it looks great, the LG in this regard looks better.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
It’s a similar story with detail. The LG uses a 4K DLP chip to create an image, and detail is that technology’s main strength compared to LCD with pixel shifting, which is what Epson uses. The image just looks a little sharper, especially with motion. However, if you’re not watching them side by side, I’m not sure you’d notice. The 5050UB certainly doesn’t look soft, it’s definitely 4K to my eye.
The next aspect of picture quality is where the tide turns toward the Epson by a lot. In a word, or technically two: contrast ratio. Even without using its iris, the native contrast of the 5050UB’s three LCD chips is significantly higher than the LG — 10times higher. So the image has significantly more punch and is less washed out. Even if you dial the LG’s lasers and iris back as much as possible, it only just matches the Epson’s black level while that projector is in its brightest and most color temperature-accurate mode.
Which is to say, the Epson’s black levels are roughly the same while at the same time (in the same mode) it is capable of having highlights or bright parts of the same image that are seven times brighter than when the LG’s lasers are dialed all the way down and the iris is closed. Flipping that around, if you match their light outputs, the Epson’s black levels in the same mode are nine times darker.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
What does this look like? An easy example is watching any movie with letterbox bars. If I set the projectors to be roughly the same brightness overall, the letterbox bars on the LG are gray. If I match their letterbox bars by reducing the LG’s laser power and closing its iris, it ends up looking dim compared to the Epson.
So when watching any content, the deep blacks of the 5050UB, while maintaining bright highlights, make for an extremely pleasing image.
Comparison to the Epson Home Cinema LS11000
While reviewing Epson’s own LS11000, I compared it to the 5050. The LS11000 is $1,000 more expensive, and uses a laser instead of the 5050’s UHP lamp. Since there will be no lamp replacements for the life of the projector, the total ownership cost difference between these two projectors is less than it initially appears.
The Epson LS11000.
Geoff Morrison/CNET
Sharpness is one of the most noticeable differences between these two. The LS11000’s pixel shift quadruples the pixels from its 1080p chips, so it’s 1080pX4 compared to the 5050’s 1080pX2. So between those two projectors the LS11000 is definitely sharper, which makes sense because it has twice the resolution. Both are less detailed than a 4K DLP, but sharpness is that technology’s biggest strength.
Contrast is a different story, and a surprising one. I measured the 5050’s contrast ratio at 5,203:1 vs. the LS11000’s 1,808:1, which is significantly worse. Even the LS11000’s dynamic contrast is lower, where the laser power tracks the brightness of incoming video signal and adjusts accordingly. However, this mode is more useful on the LS11000, since this adjustment happens pretty much instantly, far faster than the mechanical iris on the 5050. So even though the numbers suggest the 5050 blows the LS11000 away, subjectively and side-by-side they’re fairly comparable. That’s impressive, especially since the 5050 is cheaper and far older.
With SDR the LS11000 looks a little better and has more natural color. With HDR the LS11000 does a better job reproducing a wider color gamut. However, the difference isn’t huge in either case.
Geoff Morrison/CNET
All told, the LS11000 is a diagonal step from the 5050. Overall it does look better, but not the 25% better implied by its price. However, if you include the “total cost of ownership,” which in this case means $330 lamps every 2.5 years or so with the 5050, the price is eventually roughly the same. So with a bit better performance and that laser keeping the ownership costs in check, the LS11000 is worth considering if you’re looking at the 5050, despite being, on paper, $1,000 more expensive.
For more, read our in-depth Epson Home Cinema LS11000 4K laser projector review.
Charge your friends admission
The Home Cinema 5050UB is an excellent projector. At $3,000 it’s certainly not cheap, but for those looking to buy a PJ for a dedicated home theater or a light-controlled living room that can do its black levels justice, the image quality is definitely a step above less expensive projectors. Is it, say, over twice as good as the $1,300 Optoma UHD35? Perhaps. The Optoma is very good for the price, but that’s certainly the caveat: “for the price.” It holds its own, but it has a way worse contrast ratio and doesn’t handle HDR nearly as well as the Epson.
I think most people would be perfectly content with the UHD35. But for enthusiasts looking for a more “home cinema” experience the… oh wait, I just said the name of the thing in the thing. Let me try that again. For those looking for a more “home theater” experience, the Epson Home Cinema 5050UB does just about everything right and looks fantastic.
Geek Box
Test
Result
Score
Black luminance (0%)
0.046
Average
Peak white luminance (100%)
192.3
Good
Derived lumens
1732
Good
Avg. grayscale error (10-100%)
7.624
Poor
Dark gray error (20%)
6.223
Average
Bright gray error (70%)
7.432
Poor
Avg. color error
3.636
Average
Red error
3.527
Average
Green error
2.199
Good
Blue error
4.345
Average
Cyan error
5.111
Average
Magenta error
2.461
Good
Yellow error
4.173
Average
Avg. saturations error
8.34
Poor
Avg. color checker error
8.5
Poor
Input lag (Game mode)
28.4
Good
Measurement notes
I found the Bright Cinema color mode offered the best combination of light output and accuracy. In the six-color temperature mode, the 5050UB was pretty spot on D65 across the grayscale range. In addition, all primary and secondary colors were spot on their Rec. 709 targets. This is one of the most accurate projectors we’ve reviewed in the last year.
The native contrast ratio was excellent for a projector, with an average of 5,203:1 across various modes. For comparison, the second best contrast ratio we’ve measured recently was the BenQ HT2050A with a native contrast ratio of 2,094:1.
With the lamp mode (called Power Consumption) set to High and the iris off, the 5050UB puts out an impressive 192.3 nits, or roughly 1,732 lumens. The Eco mode drops the light output by about 30%. If you turn on the iris, which opens with bright images and closes with dark images, the dynamic contrast ratio rockets up beyond 100,000:1.
While the Bright Cinema mode looked better overall, the Cinema mode offered wider colors for HDR content. However, it was also much dimmer. I didn’t find the ~10% greater color gamut for ~60% less light to be a worthy trade-off, but feel free to check it out. The contrast ratio was about 40% better in this mode as well, which was only slightly noticeable.
If you need even more light, the Dynamic color mode puts out an impressive 323.6 nits, roughly 2,914 lumens, though the overall image isn’t as good or accurate.
When it comes to buying a new phone in 2025, choice is abundant out there. This can be great for consumers of all budgets, but it does mean that you can spend a lot of time obsessing over the details. To avoid all that, our experts have you covered with the definitive list of the best phones you can buy right now.
If you’re a regular reader of Trusted Reviews then you’ll know that we’ve been testing the latest phones for over 20 years, so not only do we know exactly what makes a great phone, we’re always aware of how a new line-up compares to the old guard. For instance, on the surface, the Galaxy S25 looks almost identical to the Galaxy S24, but there are a few differences afoot and we’ve put them through their paces to discover the impact that they make.
Whenever we get a phone in for testing, we always use it as our primary device over the course of the review, taking notes not just about big ticket concerns like the overall usability and the prowess of the cameras, but also key metrics like the battery drain after streaming Netflix for half an hour, or the single-core performance in chipset benchmarking.
All of this data combines to ensure that our reviews provide you with the best possible understanding before you decide to buy the phone in question.
You may also want to take a gander at the current crop of best smartwatches to get even more out of your handset.
Whatever you decide to buy, there’s a good chance that it’ll be discounted as part of Amazon’s Prime Day sale. In previous years, we’ve seen everything from iPhones to budget handsets bestowed with a reduction or two, so you can almost guarantee that the latest handsets will feature once again in Amazon’s annual sale.
Advertisement
Which is the best smartphone to buy in 2025?
SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST
Learn more about how we test mobile phones
Every phone included in the below list has been properly tested and used for an extended period by one of our product experts. We don’t review phones based purely on specs or a manufacturer’s claims – we use them as our everyday devices for at least five days and usually for much longer.
If you read a phone review on Trusted Reviews, you’ll know the reviewer has popped their personal SIM card into the phone, transferred across their most-used apps and even their backlog of WhatsApp messages. We go all in, so you know you’re getting an honest view of a product.
Our review process includes a mixture of real-world tests, along with more than 15 measured tests and industry-standard benchmarks. We believe this gives the most rounded view of a device. The scores a phone receives from a run under our professional colourimeters aren’t worth much if the screen can’t be used comfortably on a sunny day.
Pros
Redesigned chassis feels good in the hand
Oodles of power under the hood
Excellent camera performance
Gorgeous display with super-slim bezels
Cons
Much of the camera hardware remains unchanged
Battery doesn’t last as long as 2025 rivals
New Galaxy AI features are limited
Pros
Exceptional battery life
Larger screen with impossibly thin bezels
Top-end processing power
Impressive video quality
Cons
Apple Intelligence isn’t that smart or widely available
Camera Control is awkward to use
Very expensive
Pros
Redesigned chassis looks way more modern
Holistic, genuinely helpful approach to AI
Amazing photo and video capabilities
All-day battery life
Cons
Second price hike in two years
Can get hot when gaming
Tensor G4 isn’t much more powerful than the G3
Pros
Exceptional battery life
Impressive performance
Top-end screen
Versatile camera setup
Cons
Issues with camera focus and halo effects
More bloatware
Limited AI smarts compared to some brands
Pros
Incredible performance
Excellent speakers
Slick professional design
Awesome LED lighting effects
Cons
Very expensive
Cameras aren’t the best
Charging could be quicker
Pros
A joy to use and hold
Uncompromising flagship screen
Plenty of power
Solid camera performance
Cons
Battery struggles to last a single day
Relatively slow 25W charging
No dedicated zoom lens
Gets warm rather easily
Pros
Excellent and brighter external display
Solid camera performance
Unique finish options
Smooth performance
Cons
Only 3 years of Android OS updates
Moto AI still needs work
No telephoto lens
Pros
Lightest book-style foldable around
Ultra thin design makes it really nice to use
Larger, wider, wholly more useful screens
Same main camera as Galaxy S25 Ultra
Cons
Relatively small 4400mAh battery
Slow 25W wired charging
Zoom camera could be better for the price
Pros
Best battery life of any Pixel
Clean, more understated look
Great camera performance
Premium AI features
Cons
Thick screen bezels look dated
No dedicated zoom lens
Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips
Slow charging
Pros
Great bright display
Good main camera performance
Excellent battery life and charging
Great IP69 protection
Cons
Some performance foibles
Curved screen is a bit dated now
Moto AI isn’t that exciting
Apps tray clutter
Redesigned chassis feels good in the hand
Oodles of power under the hood
Excellent camera performance
Gorgeous display with super-slim bezels
Much of the camera hardware remains unchanged
Battery doesn’t last as long as 2025 rivals
New Galaxy AI features are limited
Forget just being a great Android phone, there are enough bells and whistles in the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra to make even the best iPhones jealous. This is a beast of a smartphone, and while its starting price of £1249/£1299 does make it quite an investment compared to the competition, if you do want the best out there then this is it.
Admittedly, the overall amount of upgrades compared to the Galaxy S24 Ultra are relatively small, so if you currently own that phone (or even the Galaxy S23 Ultra) then Samsung’s latest flagship might not warrant an immediate swap. However, one key change that is welcome is the bump to a 50MP ultrawide lens.
Sitting alongside the three other rear-facing lenses, this new and improved ultrawide offers up more detailed landscape shots, making them appear more eye-catching and less washed out than before. Of course, those other sensors are still firing on all cylinders as the S25 Ultra excels in everything from zoom photography to close-up portraits.
The bezels have also been shaved down to make the screen slightly larger at 6.9-inches. This makes Samsung’s Ultra phone better than ever for streaming films on the go or indulging in a spot of gaming, as the screen draws you in with greater effect.
The inclusion of the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chip brings about a huge boost of power too, including new Galaxy AI features such as Now Brief which can analyse your day and give you key bits of contextual information when the AI feels you’ll benefit from it the most.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207165
Exceptional battery life
Larger screen with impossibly thin bezels
Top-end processing power
Impressive video quality
Apple Intelligence isn’t that smart or widely available
Camera Control is awkward to use
Very expensive
If you’re looking for a true flagship phone and have settled on iOS as your operating system of choice, you’re going to be looking at the iPhone 16 Pro Max – the current best iPhone on the market.
Though it may not look all that different to its predecessor, the iPhone 16 Pro Max comes with a host of small, yet meaningful upgrades. The 6.7-inch 120Hz OLED screen has increased to a whopping 6.9 inches, though without much of an expansion of the overall footprint thanks to much slimmer bezels. Seriously, this thing has some of the slimmest screen bezels on the market.
Not content with the customisable Action Button, the iPhone 16 Pro Max also features a Camera Control button with a touch-sensitive surface that lets you swipe to zoom, change modes and more, as well as take the actual photo. However, the idea is better than the execution, with a less-than-ideal placement of the button that makes using it awkward.
It’s also impressively powerful with the A18 Pro chipset at its heart, delivering benchmarks that beat every single other smartphone in our chart, making it the most powerful smartphone around right now – and that’s reflected in everyday performance.
The A18 Pro also powers the new Apple Intelligence functionality, but none of the killer AI features are available just yet, and the functionality is also limited to US owners right now – so don’t be fooled by Apple’s worldwide AI marketing push.
Throw in solid camera performance with a new 48MP ultrawide alongside the returning 48MP main and 12MP 5x telephoto lenses and true all-day battery life and you’ve got the best iPhone to date.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10187761
Redesigned chassis looks way more modern
Holistic, genuinely helpful approach to AI
Amazing photo and video capabilities
All-day battery life
Second price hike in two years
Can get hot when gaming
Tensor G4 isn’t much more powerful than the G3
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a fantastic Android phone that, even with a price rise for a second year, still undercuts rivals like the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra when it comes to price while offering a comparable experience.
Google’s latest flagship, launched alongside the new compact Pixel 9 Pro and regular Pixel 9, ticks just about all the boxes our reviewers look for in a phone that ends up on this list. It has a great 6.7-inch Super Actua screen with a smooth adaptive 120Hz refresh rate and impressive max brightness that makes it easy to use in daylight, accompanied by a refreshed design with flat edges, rounded corners and even a redesigned camera housing that makes it look slick.
But the biggest reason to opt for the Pixel 9 Pro XL is the camera performance. Our reviewer was very impressed with the photography skills of this phone, praising its true-to-life skin tones, colours and crisp nature of images. It handles skin and pictures of faces better than the iPhone 16 Pro, or Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, and delivers a better-quality digital zoom too.
That’s thanks to Google’s usual suite of photo-focused AI tools and functions like Super Res Zoom and Magic Eraser, but it goes so much further than that.
Using the latest Tensor G4, the Pixel 9 Pro XL can run Google Gemini on-device for a faster, more responsive experience, and it boasts several key new features like the ability to search for content in screenshots, generate images, summarise calls (in the US, anyway) and much more. It really does permeate the entire OS, offering a more holistic approach to AI than much of the competition.
But while it powers the upgraded AI experience, the Tensor G4 isn’t quite as capable as the competing Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and that means the phone can get pretty toasty when gaming. Still, it’s power efficient enough to deliver solid all-day battery life without scrambling for a charger by the evening.
Oh, and did we mention that it’ll get seven years of OS upgrades too? Because it will.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10187772
Exceptional battery life
Impressive performance
Top-end screen
Versatile camera setup
Issues with camera focus and halo effects
More bloatware
Limited AI smarts compared to some brands
For a good while it was the Oppo Find X8 Pro that held this spot, and while that phone does still excel in the battery department, it’s the OnePlus 13 that truly floored us in testing. On the surface, the phone’s 6000mAh cell is already impressive, particularly at a time when battery sizes are decreasing amidst some flagship phones, but it’s the performance of that cell that really hits home.
In our testing period with the OnePlus 13, we genuinely struggled to deplete the battery completely over the course of an intensive day of use. Just for context, half an hour spent playing Mario Kart Tour resulted in a battery drop of only 4%.
What this means is that if you’re a heavy smartphone user who still wants some juice left in the tank by the end of the day, or you’re the type of person who wants to see their phone last into a second day under moderate use then the OnePlus 13 has you covered.
Luckily, this phone isn’t a one-trick pony either as beyond the outstanding battery life, there are tons of other features to appreciate including a versatile camera set-up that’ll have you prepared for almost any lighting scenario, as well as unbelievable performance that comes courtesy of the Snapdragon 8 Elite.
The 6.82-inch AMOLED display is also a joy to use, still featuring that same OnePlus look where the sides fall over the edges for a wonderful sense of immersion. It doesn’t necessarily outdo the OnePlus 12 by a wide margin, but the OnePlus 13 is still a great phone overall.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207250
Incredible performance
Excellent speakers
Slick professional design
Awesome LED lighting effects
Very expensive
Cameras aren’t the best
Charging could be quicker
If you want the best possible phone for playing games on the go, our top recommendation is the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition.
Performance is a top priority for gamers, which is why Asus has gone all-out with the Snapdragon 8 Elite and a whopping 24GB of RAM. Combined with Asus’ proprietary internal cooling tech and the optional cooler that straps to your phone, the ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition delivered consistently solid performance even in high-end demanding mobile games like Genshin Impact.
It’s the gaming-specific features that really stand out though, with the AirTriggers allowing you to use and hold the phone like a gamepad, while the Armoury Crate software allows you to display the frame rate and optimise performance settings. Honestly, there’s a bevvy of optional accessories for the phone to customise the experience to your liking.
Like its predecessor, the ROG Phone 9 Pro doesn’t really look like a gaming phone – though the telltale signs are there if you really look. The LED-powered AniMe Vision screen is back, though with a massive increase to the LEDs taking the total up to 648 LEDs, allowing it to display graphics, text and even battery levels via the back of the phone. Elsewhere, though, it’s very toned-down for a gaming phone, something that’ll likely appeal to more casual mobile gamers.
We also appreciate the slimline bezels on offer from the gaming phone, and the camera performance isn’t terrible for a gaming phone even if it pales in comparison to the likes of the Galaxy S24 Ultra, helping it justify that top-end price tag.
That said, costing well over £1000/$1000, this is a seriously expensive phone. Those who want a more versatile phone may want to look elsewhere, as the camera quality is still behind that of the competition. But if you fancy a gaming phone that doesn’t look like a gaming phone, there is no better choice than the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition.
A joy to use and hold
Uncompromising flagship screen
Plenty of power
Solid camera performance
Battery struggles to last a single day
Relatively slow 25W charging
No dedicated zoom lens
Gets warm rather easily
If you want an ultra-slim, lightweight flagship with a fantastic 6.7-inch AMOLED screen, you’ll find no better than Samsung’s new Galaxy S25 Edge.
At 5.6mm thick and 163g, it’s incredibly thin and light compared to most of the flagship competition, especially big-screen alternatives like the S25 Ultra and iPhone 16 Pro Max, which makes for a fantastic in-hand feel. It’s super light while being durable with a titanium frame and IP68 dust resistance, with no real design compromise to achieve its ultra-slim dimensions.
However, it is very much a design-first smartphone. There are only two cameras, for example, lacking the telephoto present on much of the competition, and it can struggle to keep the top-end Snapdragon 8 Elite cool, especially when gaming.
The biggest compromise is undoubtedly battery life, with the 6.7-inch QHD+ screen simply too much for a small 3900mAh cell, and it struggles to last all day as a result.
That said, if you’re willing to compromise and possibly carry around a power bank, the experience of using the S25 Edge is unlike anything else on this list.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207621
Excellent and brighter external display
Solid camera performance
Unique finish options
Smooth performance
Only 3 years of Android OS updates
Moto AI still needs work
No telephoto lens
While the Z Flip from Samsung can be seen as the pioneer of the modern flip phone, the Z Flip 6 isn’t the very best phone we’ve tested with this design. In fact, the best clamshell foldable we’ve reviewed is the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra.
While this year’s foldable may not be dramatically different from last year’s Razr 50 Ultra, it offers improvements where they matter. That includes a more durable build, complete with a new titanium hinge, and upgraded IP48 dust and water resistance.
That said, the core experience is solid, though given that it’s the best around, it’s not much of a complaint. The 4-inch cover screen remains the star of the show, with the ability to run widgets and full Android apps, reducing how often you need to unfold the phone.
When you do unfold, a larger 7-inch pOLED screen will greet you. Sporting Pantone Validation for accurate colours, it’s a great panel for scrolling, browsing and anything else you can think of. The crease is still present, of course, but it’s much shallower and less noticeable than most alternatives.
There’s also a performance boost, up to the flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite, and it ships with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage as standard, making it all the more tempting.
Battery life is also exceptional, never struggling to last all day without needing a top-up, and 68W charging means you can recharge in around 45 minutes.
Sure, its promise of three OS upgrades and four years of security patches falls way behind Samsung’s seven-year guarantee, but we think the experience, on the whole, is among the best you’ll find on the foldable market.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207648
Lightest book-style foldable around
Ultra thin design makes it really nice to use
Larger, wider, wholly more useful screens
Same main camera as Galaxy S25 Ultra
Relatively small 4400mAh battery
Slow 25W wired charging
Zoom camera could be better for the price
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 marks a genuine leap forward for Samsung’s book-style foldable, finally delivering the ultra-slim, lightweight design many have been waiting for.
Shedding much of the bulk and weight of its predecessors, the 4.2mm-thick Fold 7 is now among the thinnest foldables around, and at 215g, it’s both lighter than the book-style competition and even the Galaxy S25 Ultra. It makes it a joy to handle, and it’s almost unnoticeable in the pocket as a result.
Samsung has also nailed the usability of both displays this year. The wider 6.5-inch cover screen is genuinely practical for everyday tasks, while the 8-inch internal panel feels more solid with a way less intrusive crease. Both screens are bright, vibrant and ideal for everything from gaming to multitasking.
Camera performance is another highlight, with the main 200MP sensor borrowed from the S25 Ultra delivering sharp, detailed shots that put the Fold 7 on par with regular bar phones. General performance is equally impressive, thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite and up to 16GB of RAM.
Battery life and charging remain the main drawbacks with a 4400mAh cell and 25W charging falling far behind rivals. Still, for most users, the Fold 7 will comfortably last a day, and the overall package is compelling enough to make it the standout book-style foldable of 2025.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207783
Best battery life of any Pixel
Clean, more understated look
Great camera performance
Premium AI features
Thick screen bezels look dated
No dedicated zoom lens
Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips
Slow charging
If your budget doesn’t quite extend as far as flagships like the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the budget-focused Google Pixel 9a could be what you’re looking for.
Sporting a clean, understated design with flat edges and no camera bar that separates itself from the flagship Pixel equivalent for the first time, the 9a is a compact 6.3-inch smartphone that looks and feels like a flagship.
That flagship look is backed up by flagship performance in the form of the Tensor G4, also found in the Pixel 9 collection. While Google’s SoC isn’t as performance-focused as alternatives from Qualcomm and co, it provides responsive, snappy, everyday performance while also powering some pretty impressive AI features.
It’s this focus on AI, combined with Google’s stock approach to Android 15, that gives the Pixel 9a its charm. It can do most things that the top-end Pixel flagship can, including the new Add Me functionality, with only a few niche features exclusive to the flagship equivalent.
It also gets the Pixel flagship’s seven-year OS upgrade promise, almost unheard of in the mid-range market.
Camera performance continues to be a highlight for Google’s mid-ranger, with a new 48MP main camera that can easily outshine similarly priced phones like the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G. The lack of a telephoto does threaten Google’s dominance, but the digital Super Res Zoom still does the trick up to the 10x mark.
Battery life is also excellent, not just for the ‘a’ series but for Pixels in general, with a large 5100mAh cell easily getting our reviewer through the day without scrambling for a charger – and that’s not always a given with Pixels.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207452
Great bright display
Good main camera performance
Excellent battery life and charging
Great IP69 protection
Some performance foibles
Curved screen is a bit dated now
Moto AI isn’t that exciting
Apps tray clutter
If your budget doesn’t quite extend to the heights of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and iPhone 16 Pro Max, the £299 Motorola Edge 60 Fusion should be one for serious consideration. Don’t let the budget nature fool you though; this is very much a capable phone that punches above its weight class in many respects.
Measuring 7.9mm thick and 178g, it’s a delight to hold and use, further complemented by either vegan leather rear or silky plastic finish, depending on the colour option you go for, of which there are four colourful options.
That’s further improved by premium features like MIL-STD-810H protection, full IP68 dust and water resistance and a 6.7-inch curved OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate. It’s not quite as snappy as last year’s 144Hz panel, but given that most games can’t hit those kinds of framerates, it seems like a smart downgrade.
The MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is a fairly standard affair at the price point, paired with a generous 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage as standard. As a result, it’s in-line with some of the best cheap performers including the Nothing Phone 3a, never struggling in daily use – though gamers may want to look elsewhere.
Despite its svelte dimensions, Motorola has packed a 5200mAh battery into the phone that doesn’t struggle to last a full day, and with 68W charging, you’ll get a full charge in less than an hour That easily beats the likes of the Pixel 9 Pro XL, iPhone 16 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra in the charging department.
There’s also a 50MP main camera and a 13MP ultrawide camera that perform pretty well in both well-lit and low-light scenarios, and Android 15 with little bloat is another treat. Seriously, what’s not to like?
Advertisement
FAQs
What is a 90 or 120Hz display, and why would I want one?
Most of the phones included within this list feature a high refresh rate display, either at 90Hz or 120Hz. This means the display refreshes at either 90 or 120 times per second, up from the older standard of 60Hz. Having a fast display makes everything feel a bit smoother, be it swiping through Instagram or gaming. The iPhone 16 with its 60Hz display, for example, simply can’t compare to the smooth scrolling you’ll get from the 120Hz iPhone 16 Pro.
Should I buy a phone with 5G?
Most new phones, especially those over £400/$400, will now support 5G. This is the next step up from 4G, and provides faster and more reliable download speeds in areas where the network is live. 5G varies by country, with the USA touting a tech called mmWave that has far superior speeds if you’re in the right spot. While 5G isn’t a must-have yet, it’s always good to futureproof your purchases and as most new phones come with the tech now you likely won’t miss out.
How much should I spend on a phone?
There are excellent phones at all price points these days, with the best often costing above a grand if you want the very best. If you aren’t so fussed about things like camera performance and display quality, you can get an excellent device for £500/$600.
Test Data
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
OnePlus 13
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Google Pixel 9a
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Geekbench 6 single core
2886
3338
1865
3123
3055
2524
2828
2318
1652
1047
Geekbench 6 multi core
9515
8167
4144
9493
9658
9220
8552
8828
3801
3019
Max brightness
–
–
3000 nits
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1 hour video playback (Netflix, HDR)
–
6 %
6 %
–
6 %
–
6 %
8 %
1 %
6 %
30 minute gaming (light)
7 %
4 %
11 %
–
10 %
16 %
5 %
7 %
6 %
8 %
Time from 0-100% charge
62 min
106 min
80 min
–
46 min
76 min
80 min
87 min
108 min
55 min
Time from 0-50% charge
20 Min
30 Min
24 Min
–
18 Min
25 Min
39 Min
31 Min
40 Min
25 Min
30-min recharge (included charger)
–
–
–
–
76 %
–
–
–
–
–
15-min recharge (included charger)
–
–
–
–
39 %
–
–
–
–
–
30-min recharge (no charger included)
70 %
50 %
62 %
–
–
61 %
40 %
49 %
40 %
61 %
15-min recharge (no charger included)
35 %
27 %
29 %
–
–
33 %
23 %
24 %
22 %
33 %
3D Mark – Wild Life
6680
4128
2511
6647
5948
–
6294
5574
2597
847
GFXBench – Aztec Ruins
78 fps
60 fps
44 fps
60 fps
138 fps
76 fps
105 fps
70 fps
66 fps
17 fps
GFXBench – Car Chase
77 fps
60 fps
53 fps
60 fps
160 fps
82 fps
95 fps
71 fps
79 fps
23 fps
Full Specs
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Review
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Review
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Review
OnePlus 13 Review
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition Review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Review
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Review
Google Pixel 9a Review
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Review
UK RRP
£1249
£1199
£1099
£899
£1299
£1099
£1099.99
£1799
£499
£299.99
USA RRP
$1299
$1199
$1099
–
$1499
$1099
–
$1999
$499
Unavailable
EU RRP
–
€1449
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Manufacturer
Samsung
Apple
Google
OnePlus
Asus
Samsung
Motorola
Samsung
Google
Motorola
Screen Size
6.9 inches
6.9 inches
6.8 inches
6.8 mm
6.78 inches
6.7 inches
7 inches
8 inches
6.3 inches
6.67 inches
Storage Capacity
256GB, 512GB, 1TB
256GB, 512GB, 1TB
128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
256GB, 512GB
1TB
256GB, 512GB
512GB
256GB, 512GB, 1TB
128GB, 256GB
256GB, 512GB
Rear Camera
200MP + 50MP + 50MP + 10MP
48MP + 48MP + 12MP
50MP + 48MP + 48MP
50MP + 50MP + 50MP
50MP + 32MP + 13MP
200MP + 12MP
50MP + 50MP
200MP + 12MP + 10MP
48MP + 13MP
50MP main + 13MP ultrawide
Front Camera
12MP
12MP
42MP
32MP
32MP
12MP
50MP
10MP + 10MP
13MP
32MP
Video Recording
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IP68
IP68
IP69
IP68
IP68
Not Disclosed
Not Disclosed
IP68
IP69
Battery
5000 mAh
4685 mAh
5060 mAh
5998 mAh
5800 mAh
3900 mAh
4700 mAh
4400 mAh
5100 mAh
5200 mAh
Wireless charging
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
–
Yes
Yes
Yes
–
Fast Charging
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
–
Yes
Yes
–
Yes
Size (Dimensions)
77.6 x 8.2 x 162.8 MM
77.6 x 8.3 x 163 MM
76.6 x 8.5 x 162.8 MM
76.5 x 8.5 x 162.9 MM
76.8 x 8.9 x 163.8 MM
75.6 x 5.8 x 158.2 MM
74 x 7.1 x 171 MM
143.2 x 4.2 x 158.4 MM
73.3 x 8.9 x 154.7 MM
73 x 8 x 161 MM
Weight
218 G
227 G
221 G
210 G
227 G
163 G
199 G
215 G
186 G
178 G
ASIN
B0DPR5MYZ9
B0DGHZ1MC2
–
–
–
–
B0F68G1YR8
–
B0DSWFHTL2
B0F48H546B
Operating System
OneUI 7 (Android 15)
iOS 18
Android 14
OxygenOS 15
Android 15
OneUI 7 (Android 15)
Android 15
OneUI 8 (Android 16)
Android 15
Android 15
Release Date
2025
2024
2024
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
First Reviewed Date
30/01/2025
13/11/2024
21/08/2024
07/01/2025
19/11/2024
23/05/2025
20/05/2025
17/07/2025
10/04/2025
26/05/2025
Resolution
1440 x 3120
1320 x 2868
1344 x 2992
1440 x 3168
2400 x 1080
1440 x 3120
2992 x 1224
2184 x 1968
1080 x 2424
1220 x 2712
HDR
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
185 Hz
120 Hz
165 Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
Ports
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C x2, 3.5mm headphone port
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Apple A18 Pro
Google Tensor G4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Google Tensor G4
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
RAM
12GB, 16GB
8GB
16GB
12GB, 16GB
–
12GB
16GB
12GB, 16GB
8GB
12GB
Colours
Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray
Black Titanium, White Titanium, Natural Titanium, Desert Titanium
Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian
Black, Blue, White
Black
Titanium Silver, Titanium Jetblack and Titanium Icyblue
Pantone Rio Red, Pantone Cabaret, Pantone Mountain Trail, Pantone Scarab
Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jet-black, Mint
Obsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony
Pantone Slipstream, Pantone Amazonite, Pantone Zephyr, Pantone Mykonos Blue
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Alienware 16 Area-51: Two-minute review
There are only a few gaming laptop releases that’ll impress buyers this year as much as the Alienware 16 Area-51. Everything about this work of premium art and technology oozes perfection.
Though the configuration I reviewed came out to around $3,249.99 / £3,349 / AU$5,497.80, there’s plenty of scalability in terms of both price and component options, with systems starting at $1,999.99 / £2,149.01 / AU$4,198.70.
The design alone places this as one of the best gaming laptops going, thanks to a futuristically sleek design that mirrors its desktop sibling with “fluid contours and soft surfaces” that blends nice angles, lovely multi-zone customizable lighting, smart port placement, clever ventilation, a clear glass panel on the bottom to show of the internals, and much more.
The phenomenal design philosophy is matched with gaming performance that’ll impress enthusiasts and competitive gamers alike. All of that power is pumped out through a 16-inch 2560×1600 display that offers a 240Hz refresh rate as well.
However, holding the display back significantly is the image quality. Despite featuring 100% DCI-P3, 500 nits of brightness, and Nvidia G-Sync, images lack crispness and can come off as smudged a bit as well. Thankfully, the Dolby Atmos-certified speakers provide great, nuanced sound for gaming alongside general music listening.
That doesn’t even count the amount of extras that are featured on the Area-51 16, such as the option to have a full RGB mechanical keyboard, which makes it to where serious players don’t have to use a USB slot and lug an extra keyboard around.
Even outside of gaming, the mechanical keyboard makes general computing tasks a thrill thanks to how fantastic keystrokes feel. In a cool touch, the touchpad itself glows with customizable lighting too.
All of this greatness does come at the cost of borderline abysmal battery life, which comes with the territory of most high-end gaming laptops.
Those in need of more juice for long flights or times without a nearby electrical socket may be in some trouble. Regardless, the Alienware 16 Area-51 is out of this world when it comes to laptop gaming.
Alienware 16 Area-51: Price & availability
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
How much does it cost? Starting at $1,999.99 / £2,149.01 / AU$4,198.70
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia
The Alienware 16 Area-51 is now available through Dell’s online store and other digital retailers, starting at $1999.99 / £2,149.01 / AU$4,198.70. Buyers in the US, UK, and Australia can choose from a range of configurations and options tailored to their Windows gaming needs.
My review unit was configured with an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080, 32GB RAM, and 1TB SSD Storage comes in at $2,849.99 / £3,298.99 / AU$5,497.80. Other features include the 4K web camera and mechanical keyboard options.
While not the most expensive laptop in its size class, it’s not the cheapest either, but its starting price is very good for a laptop with this kind of premium feel.
Alienware 16 Area-51: Specs
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Row 0 – Cell 0
Alienware Area-51 16 (Lowest Configuration)
Alienware Area-51 16 (Review)
Alienware Area-51 16 (Highest Configuration)
Price:
$1,999.99 at Dell.com | £2,149.01 at Dell.com | AU$4,198.70 at Dell.com
$2,849.99 at Dell.com | £3,298.99 at Dell.com | AU$5,497.80 at Dell.com
$5,499.99 at Dell.com | £5,779 at Dell.com | AU$$8,847.30 at Dell.com
12TB (3 x 4TB) PCIe SSD (4TB PCIe SSD in Australia)
Ports:
1X SD Card Slot, 1 x 3.5mm Headset Jack, 2 x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1, 1 x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1, 2 x USB-C Thunderbolt 4 ports, 1 x HDMI 2.1
1X SD Card Slot, 1 x 3.5mm Headset Jack, 2 x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1, 1 x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1, 2 x USB-C Thunderbolt 4 ports, 1 x HDMI 2.1
1X SD Card Slot, 1 x 3.5mm Headset Jack, 2 x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1, 1 x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1, 2 x USB-C Thunderbolt 4 ports, 1 x HDMI 2.1
Wireless:
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750 (2×2 320Hz) MIMO 802.11be Wireless LAN and Bluetooth 5.4
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750 (2×2 320Hz) MIMO 802.11be Wireless LAN and Bluetooth 5.4
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750 (2×2 320Hz) MIMO 802.11be Wireless LAN and Bluetooth 5.4
Camera:
1080P Webcam
4K Webcam
4K Webcam
Weight:
7.49 lbs | 3.40 kg
7.49 lbs | 3.40 kg
7.49 lbs | 3.40 kg
Dimensions:
14.37 x 11.41 x 1.12 ins | 365 x 290 x 28.5mm (W x D x H)
14.37 x 11.41 x 1.12 ins | 365 x 290 x 28.5mm (W x D x H)
14.37 x 11.41 x 1.12 ins | 365 x 290 x 28.5mm (W x D x H)
Alienware 16 Area-51: Design
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
Sleek, rounded design with a beautiful liquid teal colorway and RGB lighting nearly everywhere
Nice rear port selection and SD Card slot
Comfortable experience with the mechanical keyboard
As noted before—and it bears repeating—the Alienware 16 Area-51’s design is truly breathtaking. From the moment you unbox it, the spaceship-inspired curves and sleek, dark liquid teal finish immediately signal a premium, high-end machine that stands out in any setting. While closed, there are some noticeable design choices that truly set this gaming laptop apart from others.
Every angle of the Area-51 16 is picturesque from top to bottom. This includes the top panel featuring the standard Alienware logo that is backlit by customizable RGB.
At the bottom, you get to see the laptop’s Cryo-Chamber structure, allowing direct airflow to the laptop’s core components. This also raises the device for both comfort and larger air intake. For added measure, there’s a clear Gorilla Glass panel showing the AlienFX fans that also has customizable lighting.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
A nice selection of ports is located on the rear, which offsets the display hinge by about a few inches. That portion also features a customizable RGB light ring that circles it from top to bottom, too.
This allows access to three USB-A, two USB-C with Thunderbolt, a single HDMI port, and a power port. Those are joined on the left side by an SD Card slot and a 3.5mm headset jack. Smartly designed V-Rail edges make opening and closing the gaming laptop a smooth
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
When opened, the display offers either an FHD or a 4K webcam at the top. Below, the mechanical keyboard provides a satisfying feel for both gaming and typing, complete with customizable RGB lighting, and is flanked by a speaker system with two 2W woofers, two 2W tweeters, and Dolby Atmos certification.
The smooth, precision glass touchpad at the bottom also features customizable RGB lighting, adding to the laptop’s premium, tailored experience. Usage is made extra comfortable through a pillowed palm rest, which helps when gaming or when doing general web browsing tasks for long periods.
The Alienware Area-51 16 is just so thoughtful in the engineering and design. There’s a visual appeal and functional enhancements that elevate the ownership experience here in ways that feel luxurious yet cool.
Alienware 16 Area-51: Performance
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
Incredible power for modern AAA games with high frame rates
Can control power output through Alienware Command Center
Display performance is awesome though image quality suffers
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Alienware 16 Area-51 CPU benchmarks
Benchmark
Score
Geekbench 6.4 Single-core
3,126
Geekbench 6.4 Multi-core
20,498
Crossmark Overall
2,338
Crossmark Productivity
2,173
Crossmark Creativity
2,587
Crossmark Responsiveness
2,145
Gaming and high-end creative task performance match the design perfectly on the Alienware 16 Area-51. The Intel Core Ultra 9, Nvidia RTX 5080, 32GB RAM, and 1TB SSD in my configuration was probably the ideal way to make the most of the 16-inch 2560×1600 resolution display when it comes to configuration options.
I was able to play all the latest, visually arresting AAA games at 60+ frames per second without problems using Cyberpunk 2077, Black Myth: Wukong,Forza Motorsport (2023), Doom: The Dark Ages, and Assassin’s Creed: Shadows.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Alienware 16 Area-51 GPU benchmarks
Benchmarks
Header Cell – Column 1
Score
3DMark Fire Strike
Row 0 – Cell 1
37,813
3DMark Time Spy
Row 1 – Cell 1
21,070
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
Row 2 – Cell 1
14,073
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Row 3 – Cell 1
10,558
3DMark Speed Way
Row 4 – Cell 1
5,613
3DMark Steel Nomad
Row 5 – Cell 1
5,142
3DMark Port Royal
Row 6 – Cell 1
13,966
There are ways to push frame rates even higher thanks to Nvidia’s DLSS upscaling technology. The base configuration option is great for 1080p and 1440p gaming, while the max configuration is good enough for 4K gaming if users plan on connecting to a compatible monitor.
The Area-51 16-inch is powerful enough to edit high-resolution photo and video content without any problems in apps like Adobe Premiere and Photoshop.
Despite pushing the Area-51 16-inch to max capabilities, I didn’t hear much fan noise and it didn’t get too hot, mostly thanks to the Area-51 16-inch’s Cryotech cooling and smart vent placement.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Game
Average FPS
Assassin’s Creed Shadows (Ultra, 1080p)
52
Black Myth: Wukong (Cinematic, 1080p)
58
Cyberpunk 2077 (Ultra, 1080p)
63
Monster Hunter Wilds (Max, 1080p)
83
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Very high, 1080p)
183
Total War: Warhammer III (Ultra, 1080p)
201
Like other Alienware devices, the Command Center app is a great way to augment power delivery to focus on a quieter fan speed, focus on battery (though it doesn’t help much), and full-on performance power. Other features of the Command Center include the ability to manage various game settings alongside customizing the various RGB lighting zones around the gaming laptop.
Gaming and the display performance are good enough to make me forget how average-looking the display is when it comes to image quality, suffering from washed-out colors that aren’t very crisp.
Alienware 16 Area-51: Battery life
General computing tasks usage will give around 4 hours of usage between charges
Trying to game is only going to provide about two hours
Gaming laptops at this level rarely excel in battery life, and the Alienware 16 Area-51 is no exception. In our PCMark 10 gaming battery test, it lasted around two hours, typical for machines in this category.
More disappointing is its performance in everyday tasks: during our Battery Informant Web Surfing test, it managed just over four hours with power-saving settings like reduced RGB lighting and lower brightness.
With lighting and medium volume levels on, the battery dipped to roughly three hours before needing a recharge. It would be nice to see the power-focused sect of gaming laptops reach the level of the ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14.
On the positive side, the Alienware Battery Defender technology promises to balance power consumption with temperature monitoring to give the battery a longer life.
Charging takes a little over a few hours to reach full battery life, and there isn’t any quick charging. The power adapter brick is also pretty large as well so be mindful when traveling.
Should I buy the Alienware 16 Area-51?
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Value
Gaming laptops are expensive by nature but the lower configuration versions of the Alienware 16 Area-51 do come at an attractive price.
4 / 5
Design
Between the smooth sleek chassis with lovely RGB lighting everywhere, port placements, fan placement and see-through bottom, this is the coolest looking gaming laptop ever made. This is the perfect match of form and function.
5 / 5
Performance
No matter which configuration you choose, you’re getting top-tier components that offer impressive scalability in performance options.
5 / 5
Battery
Battery life is pretty average so users are going to have to make sure they are near some power outlet.
3 / 5
Average rating
Image quality and battery life issues aside, this gaming laptop is worth every penny.
4.25 / 5
Buy the Alienware 16 Area-51 if…
Don’t buy it if…
Also Consider
If our Alienware Area-51 16 has you considering other options, here are two laptops to consider…
Razer Blade 14 (2024) review
Though it may not have the colorful lighting of the Area-51 16 and loses about two inches of display real estate, the Razer Blade 14 is a powerhouse that’s also portable.
Read the review here
MSI Katana 15
Anyone looking for an ultra-affordable gaming laptop that’s good for 1080p gaming performance should definitely check out the MSI Katana 15.
Read the review here
How I tested the Alienware 16 Area-51
Tested the gaming laptop over the course of a week
Games tested include Forza Motorsport (2023), Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine II and Doom: The Dark Ages among others
General computing tasks include Tidal, Google Chrome and Adobe Suite
During my week with the Alienware 16 Area-51, I spent my time split between work during the day and gaming at night.
During the day, I used Google Chrome for web browsing, Gmail, Docs, and Sheets. Other software used includes Tidal to test speakers and Adobe Suite software like Photoshop, alongside Premiere Pro for creative tasks.
Outside of standard benchmark tests for games like Cyberpunk 2077 and Black Myth: Wukong, I tested out plenty of modern games, including Forza Motorsport (2023), Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine II, and Doom: The Dark Ages. I also managed to handle a few video conferences, which allowed me to test out the webcam as well.
If you’re shopping for a projector between $500 and $1,000, prepare to face a sea of clones. Sizes, designs and even button layouts are often nearly identical from one brand to the next. But there’s something different about the BenQ HT2050A. Although it has a similar price to the competition, it’s larger and there’s a more aesthetically pleasing, curvy design. It looks less like the repurposed business projector and more like something you’d want in your house. And the difference is more than skin deep: This projector’s performance is a step above as well.
Like
Bright picture with great contrast
Accurate, realistic colors
Lens is shift a rarity at this price
Don’t like
Lens shift and zoom don’t adjust far
Rainbows, if they bother you
Better
contrast ratio
and color than its counterparts create some of the best picture quality we’ve seen in this price range. Darker blacks, paired with bright whites, all with accurate color, make for a pleasing image. The cherry on top is a small amount of vertical lens shift, which is rare in this price range and almost nonexistent in single-chip
DLP projectors
. This means more people will be able to fit the projector in their homes. In short the BenQ HT2050A is one of the best projectors you can get for the price.
Editors’ note November, 2022: Despite being several years old, the HT2050A still offers great picture quality for a great price, and remains one of the best deals going for home projectors. It once again earns our Editors’ Choice award.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
BenQ HT2050A basic specs
Native resolution: 1080p
HDR-compatible: No
4K-compatible: No
3D-compatible: Yes
Lumens spec: 2,200
Zoom: Manual (1.3)
Lens shift: Manual
Lamp life (Normal mode): 3,500 hours
Like the other projectors in this price range, the HT2050A lacks 4K and HDR. It is 3D capable, though the glasses aren’t included.
BenQ claims 2,200 ANSI lumens. I measured approximately 1,591. It’s normal for projectors to measure lower than their claimed specs. This is a bright image, similar to the Epson HC2150 and only slightly less than the newer Epson HC2250.
Lens shift in this price range is rare, and rarer still with DLP projectors, so its inclusion here would be one of the HT2050A’s main selling points even if it didn’t look as good as it does. That said, the lens shift isn’t a lot. BenQ says it adjusts the vertical range by 10%. So depending where you place the projector, you’ll have a few inches of vertical leeway, but that’s it. Still, it definitely helps and is better than the nothing you get with most single-chip DLP projectors.
Watch this: Six things to know about home theater projectors
The zoom range is only average however, falling behind the Epson. So you won’t be able to place it quite as close, or as far, from the screen. In that way it’s similar to many other DLP projectors in this price range.
Also average is the lamp life, at 3,500 hours in Normal mode. This goes up to 7,000 hours in the SmartEco mode, which maintains the maximum brightness of the Normal mode but drops lamp power during dark scenes for a better black level. Though you can occasionally see this happen, it’s fast enough that it’s fine to leave in this mode (unless you notice and hate it).
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Connectivity and convenience
HDMI
inputs: 2
PC input: Analog RGB
USB port: 1 (1.5A power)
Audio input and output: Yes
Digital audio output: No
LAN port: No
12-volt trigger: Yes
RS-232 remote port: Yes
MHL: Yes
Remote: Backlit
Both HDMI inputs have HDCP 1.4, meaning you can send each input any video source you want. This isn’t the case with some competitors, which only have HDCP 1.4 on one of the HDMI inputs. The USB connection has a claimed 1.5 amp output, letting you power a streaming stick directly with no external power adapters.
The HT2050A has several legacy analog video inputs, which is a rarity these days. Not only do you get component video, but composite as well. So if you want to directly connect something like a Nintendo Wii, or, I don’t know, a LaserDisc player or something, you can do it with no extra adapters. These connections share RCA analog audio inputs.
There are also 3.5mm audio input and outputs, the latter to connect to an external speaker or
soundbar
.
The RS-232 and 12-volt trigger are useful for those with more elaborate home theater systems.
The remote is backlit with a relatively dim orange backlight. This is a good thing: Many of the current crop of projector remotes have a bright blue backlight. Using them can be like forming your own personal B-type star while you’re just trying to change the inputs in the dark.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Picture quality comparisons
I compared the HT2050A to the Epson HC2150 and the Viewsonic PX727HD. The latter, like the BenQ, is DLP. The Epson, like the majority of Epson’s projectors, is LCD. I connected these via a Monoprice 1×4 distribution amplifier and viewed them all on a 102-inch 1.0-gain screen.
Right away the differences were apparent. Firstly, the Viewsonic was far dimmer, and didn’t have the contrast ratio of the other two. This put it at a distant third, so I spent most of my time comparing the Epson and the BenQ.
Both projectors are far brighter than even high-end projectors from a few years ago. What’s more obvious than the numbers would suggest is how much better the black level, and therefore the contrast ratio, is on the BenQ. This is clear when viewing widescreen movies, with the black bars several shades darker on the BenQ. Because their light output is roughly the same, this gives the HT2050A a bit more dimensionality to the image and more apparent depth.
A good example of this is the contrasty scene in Avengers: Infinity War where Thor and his pet rabbit help Tyrion Lannister forge the Stormbreaker battle axe. Nidavellir’s colorful neutron star and magical effects are brightly offset compared to the darkness of space and the shadows of the forge. These shots don’t look bad on the Epson, but the shadows are far more gray than on the BenQ, giving the latter a more pleasing look overall.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Color is another point in the BenQ’s favor. It’s just a little richer and more realistic. Greens especially look more natural. The grass in the Battle of Wakanda, also in Infinity War, for example, is just a more vibrant and realistic shade of green. The blue of the shield wall is a stronger, more vivid blue, without the sky looking like candy.
Another place where the BenQ wins out over the Epson is with motion resolution. All LCD-based displays have some degree of motion blur. DLP-based projectors don’t, thanks to the way they create an image. This is most obvious in the way the BenQ maintains detail when things move. Take the camera-panning action of Live Die Repeat: Edge of Tomorrow. When there are closeups of Emily Blunt or Tom Cruise’s faces, you can still see fine details throughout.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
On the other hand there’s DLP’s long-standing problem: rainbows. These are multicolored trails left by bright objects on screen. You may also notice them if you move your eyes quickly. Most people either don’t see them, or aren’t bothered by them, so they may not be an issue for you. But people who are bothered by them are really bothered by them. In that case, no single-chip DLP projector is likely to work. You’ll have to go with an LCD option like the Epson HC2150, or a higher priced LCOS projector (
Sony
or JVC) or a much more expensive three-chip DLP projector.
With its high light output, great-for-its-price contrast ratio and accurate color, the HT2050A is a great choice for someone looking to replace their TV, or who wants a projector for the occasional movie night. The icing on the cake is the lens shift, which should allow the 2050 to fit in a lot more homes than most projectors in this price range.
Geek Box
Test
Result
Score
Black luminance (0%)
0.089
Average
Peak white luminance (100%)
176.7
Good
Derived lumens
1591
Good
Avg. grayscale error (10-100%)
6.608
Average
Dark gray error (20%)
3.43
Average
Bright gray error (70%)
8.499
Poor
Avg. color error
2.759
Good
Red error
5.578
Average
Green error
1.391
Good
Blue error
3.254
Average
Cyan error
3.187
Average
Magenta error
1.871
Good
Yellow error
1.274
Good
Avg. saturations error
2.07
Good
Avg. color checker error
2
Good
Avg. luminance error
3.5
Average
Input lag (Game mode)
16.4
Good
Measurement notes and suggested picture settings
Before calibration the 2050A’s most accurate picture setting was Cinema, which was OK. Its grayscale wasn’t too close to D65, especially with brighter images. This was highly adjustable, however, and was easily dialed in to be accurate. Colors were fairly accurate out of the box: They were all close to their targets except for magenta, which was a little off, but not badly. Colors, just like color temperature, were adjustable. And after calibration, they were far closer.
There’s no iris on the 2050A, but it does have a variable lamp. Eco mode is about 33% dimmer than Normal mode. The contrast ratio in the Normal and Eco modes averaged 2,094:1, which is pretty good for a projector in this price range. The DynamicEco mode, which bases the lamp power on the average picture level of the image, creates a dynamic contrast ratio about 50% higher than the other lamp settings, but the contrast ratio within a single image is still 2,094:1.
While there’s no denying that the latest iPhones are great handsets in their own right, long gone are the days of the Android crowd feeling envious of Apple’s output. Our current picks for the best Android phones have stood out from the competition, wowing our team of tech experts.
The best thing about Android has always been (and continues to be) the amount of choice you have on offer. With great options from the likes of Samsung, Google, OnePlus and more, you can decide which phone to buy based on the features that you value the most – something that can’t really be said when shopping for an iPhone.
For example, if you enjoy streaming or gaming on your smartphone, you can opt for a handset with a fast, modern chipset and a gorgeous OLED display. For those who love taking pictures with their smartphone and want the widest array of sensors possible, you’re also covered.
It’s this freedom of choice that makes Android such a great option for consumers everywhere, but it does mean that if you’re not careful, you can get bogged down in the details. Thankfully, that’s where we come in.
With all of the phones you see on this list, they were used as the main handset by the reviewer in question, and then subjected to our series of tests to ensure that the phone holds up under scrutiny. This procedure involves documenting battery drain, charging speeds, chipset performance and camera detail, just to name a few.
Once all these tests are completed, we can provide our final verdict on a phone, along with a corresponding score. Only those that really stood out from the pack are able to make it into this very list.
Advertisement
If you are curious to know a bit more about where iPhones stand against the top Android performers, you should have a read of our best phones guide. For the more budget-conscious among you, we also have price-centric buying guides in the form of the best mid-range phones and the best cheap phones.
Best Android phones at a glance
SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST
Learn more about how we test mobile phones
All the phones included in our Best Android phone list have been thoroughly tested and used by one of our expert reviewers. We will never review a phone based purely on specs and benchmark scores. We use them as our everyday device for the review period, which is usually at least five days but often a lot more.
Whenever you read a phone review published on Trusted Reviews, you should be confident that the reviewer has put their personal SIM card into the phone, synced across their most-used apps and logged into all their typical accounts. We do this so you’ll feel confident in our review and trust our verdict.
Our review process includes a mixture of real-world tests, along with more than 15 measured tests and industry-standard benchmarks. We believe this gives the most rounded view of a device.
Pros
Redesigned chassis looks way more modern
Holistic, genuinely helpful approach to AI
Amazing photo and video capabilities
All-day battery life
Cons
Second price hike in two years
Can get hot when gaming
Tensor G4 isn’t much more powerful than the G3
Pros
Redesigned chassis feels good in the hand
Oodles of power under the hood
Excellent camera performance
Gorgeous display with super-slim bezels
Cons
Much of the camera hardware remains unchanged
Battery doesn’t last as long as 2025 rivals
New Galaxy AI features are limited
Pros
Exceptional camera performance across the board
Snapdragon 8 Elite power
Pixel-packed 6.7-inch screen
All-day battery life and rapid charging
Cons
Curved display can lead to mispresses
Only four OS upgrades promised
Pros
Exceptional battery life
Impressive performance
Top-end screen
Versatile camera setup
Cons
Issues with camera focus and halo effects
More bloatware
Limited AI smarts compared to some brands
Pros
Highest-resolution telephoto lens around
Plenty of power under the hood
Top-end display experience
Cons
AI Super Zoom leaves much to be desired
Smaller battery than its predecessor
Quite similar to Honor Magic 6 Pro
Pros
A joy to use and hold
Uncompromising flagship screen
Plenty of power
Solid camera performance
Cons
Battery struggles to last a single day
Relatively slow 25W charging
No dedicated zoom lens
Gets warm rather easily
Pros
Excellent and brighter external display
Solid camera performance
Unique finish options
Smooth performance
Cons
Only 3 years of Android OS updates
Moto AI still needs work
No telephoto lens
Pros
Lightest book-style foldable around
Ultra thin design makes it really nice to use
Larger, wider, wholly more useful screens
Same main camera as Galaxy S25 Ultra
Cons
Relatively small 4400mAh battery
Slow 25W wired charging
Zoom camera could be better for the price
Pros
Incredible performance
Excellent speakers
Slick professional design
Awesome LED lighting effects
Cons
Very expensive
Cameras aren’t the best
Charging could be quicker
Pros
Best battery life of any Pixel
Clean, more understated look
Great camera performance
Premium AI features
Cons
Thick screen bezels look dated
No dedicated zoom lens
Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips
Slow charging
Redesigned chassis looks way more modern
Holistic, genuinely helpful approach to AI
Amazing photo and video capabilities
All-day battery life
Second price hike in two years
Can get hot when gaming
Tensor G4 isn’t much more powerful than the G3
If you’re shopping for an Android phone and want the best AI experience around, the Pixel 9 Pro XL is our current favourite pick.
As with any Pixel phone, the 9 Pro XL is mostly about two things – the Google software and the camera. The cameras remain fairly similar to what we saw on the Pixel 8 Pro, but refreshed tech, including larger zoom and ultrawide sensors and new AI smarts, improves performance on all three of the rear lenses. There are software tweaks, too, including a bunch of updated modes – including Night Sight Video – you’ll actually want to use.
Photos from the phone are great in practically any scenario. They are richer and more immersive than those from the Galaxy S25 series and often better in darker situations, too, despite the much higher megapixel count on offer from the S25 Ultra in particular. The zoom might not match up to Samsung’s Ultra efforts, but if you keep it to around the 5-10x mark, the results are great.
Powering the phone is Google’s Tensor G4 chipset, though like previous entries, it’s not the quickest around – many phones on this list post better benchmark scores – with the focus being instead on AI prowess.
Many software additions here are made better by this chip, including support for on-device Google Gemini smarts, the ability to search for Screenshots using natural language and even generate new images entirely on-device, and everything works very well. Samsung has started to claw back some of that interest with Galaxy AI on its flagship series, but there’s still more to take advantage of with the Pixel 9 Pro XL than the S25.
The 6.8-inch Super Actua screen is on par with high-end options from Apple and Samsung, although battery life is starting to lag behind the competition. The Pixel 9 Pro XL is also more expensive than the Pixel 8 Pro, with the new regular Pixel 9 Pro offering pro-level smarts in a smaller 6.3-inch package.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10187772
Redesigned chassis feels good in the hand
Oodles of power under the hood
Excellent camera performance
Gorgeous display with super-slim bezels
Much of the camera hardware remains unchanged
Battery doesn’t last as long as 2025 rivals
New Galaxy AI features are limited
Given that last year’s Galaxy S24 Ultra held this spot until recently, it probably shouldn’t be too much of a surprise to see that its successor, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, has now taken over its post.
While it’s true that the S25 Ultra doesn’t depict a monumental upgrade over last year’s flagship, and that if you do have that phone or even the S23 Ultra then you’re better off staying put for the time being, there’s no getting around how great this display looks on a daily basis.
This time around, the bezels have been shaved down even further to create the illusion at times that one half of the phone is simply all-screen. It certainly means that you now get the most out of its gigantic 6.9-inch AMOLED display when it comes to watching TV shows or indulging in a spot of gaming, the latter of which is a breeze thanks to the included Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chipset.
The S24 Ultra’s anti-reflective coating makes a comeback here as well, and it does a fantastic job at minimising distraction from nearby light sources. This, in turn, should have a knock-on effect on the device’s battery life as you won’t feel as pressured to up the brightness on your phone when using it outdoors.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207165
Exceptional camera performance across the board
Snapdragon 8 Elite power
Pixel-packed 6.7-inch screen
All-day battery life and rapid charging
Curved display can lead to mispresses
Only four OS upgrades promised
There’s no shortage of fantastic camera phones in the Android smartphone market, but the Xiaomi 15 Ultra stands head and shoulders above the competition with some of the best performance across the board.
That’s headed up by a 50MP main camera with a whopping 1-inch sensor that’s larger than anything you’ll find from Samsung, Apple and Google, and allows for phenomenal day-to-day performance. Not only are images crisp and detailed, but the large sensor also allows for stunning performance in low-light scenarios too.
That’s backed up by a 50MP 3x floating telephoto lens that doubles up as a pretty fantastic telemacro lens, complete with a natural bokeh you’d expect from DSLRs, and the 200MP periscope lens captures plenty of detail at the 50x mark and beyond. The 50MP ultrawide is the weakest of the four lenses, but that’s only because the others are exceptional. It’d be considered a fairly capable ultrawide lens if this were any other smartphone.
The Leica tuning is present and accounted for, both in the form of Vibrant and Authentic shooting modes along with a variety of filters and Leica-style bokeh effects when taking portrait photos.
It’s not just a great camera phone either; it sports a curved 6.73-inch WQHD+ AMOLED screen with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate, top-end Snapdragon 8 Elite power and a healthy 5410mAh battery with 90W charging.
The only real chink in its armour is its software; while HyperOS 2 is much cleaner than the older EMUI, the inspiration is still clear, and it’s about as far as you can get from stock Android. It also falls short when it comes to long-term support, with Xiaomi committing to four years of OS upgrades and six years of security patches.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207332
Exceptional battery life
Impressive performance
Top-end screen
Versatile camera setup
Issues with camera focus and halo effects
More bloatware
Limited AI smarts compared to some brands
This was a very close competition where, at one point, the Oppo Find X8 Pro was also considered, but in the end it was the outstanding OnePlus 13 that swooped in to take the crown. Simply put, if you want the best battery life possible on an Android handset for some seriously heavy use then this is the one you’ll want to get.
The included 6000mAh cell is an absolute beast, and thanks to its use of more efficient silicon carbon material, it doesn’t add much to the phone’s overall weight either. In our testing, we found it incredibly difficult to fully drain the battery during an intensive day of use. As a testament to this, we were able to play roughly half an hour of Mario Kart Tour and only see up to a 4% drop from the overall charge.
This is the type of longevity that more casual users can probably stretch to a two-day stint, and it’s made even better thanks to 100W fast charging if you pick up a compatible adapter which, unfortunately, is sold separately. However it is worth noting that wireless charging of any kind is not available with this phone.
On top of the stellar battery life, you’ve got the wonderful OxygenOS which makes using OnePlus phones feel wonderfully intuitive, and the cameras aren’t too bad either, but they pale in comparison to what Google and Samsung have achieved.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207250
Highest-resolution telephoto lens around
Plenty of power under the hood
Top-end display experience
AI Super Zoom leaves much to be desired
Smaller battery than its predecessor
Quite similar to Honor Magic 6 Pro
The Honor Magic 7 Pro is in an interesting space this year. Its predecessor, the Honor Magic 6 Pro, previously held the spot on this list as having the best battery, but this phone has a smaller cell and that spot has been taken by the superior OnePlus 13. However, there is one key area where the Honor Magic 7 Pro crushed the competition and that’s in charging.
If you’re the type of person who’s always rushing from one place to the next, with only a short window of opportunity to top up their smartphone, then you’ll be glad to know that the Magic 7 Pro’s 5270mAh battery can be topped up by either 100W wired-charging or 80W wireless charging.
In the case of that wired charge, you can get a full battery in return from just 33 minutes of connectivity, which is phenomenal. Of course, you’ll need to buy a proper 100W charger to enjoy those faster speeds as unfortunately, you won’t find one included in the box.
Don’t think that the Honor Magic 7 Pro slouches elsewhere though – this phone still benefits from some of the best cameras around, including a super high resolution telephoto lens, and all of the shots you do take look incredible on the device’s 6.8-inch, 1.2K AMOLED display.
A joy to use and hold
Uncompromising flagship screen
Plenty of power
Solid camera performance
Battery struggles to last a single day
Relatively slow 25W charging
No dedicated zoom lens
Gets warm rather easily
If you want an ultra-slim, lightweight flagship with a fantastic 6.7-inch AMOLED screen, you’ll find no better than Samsung’s new Galaxy S25 Edge.
At 5.6mm thick and 163g, it’s incredibly thin and light compared to most of the flagship competition, especially big-screen alternatives like the S25 Ultra, which makes for a fantastic in-hand feel. It’s super light yet durable, boasting a titanium frame and IP68 dust resistance, with no significant design compromise to achieve its ultra-slim dimensions.
However, it is very much a design-first smartphone. For example, there are only two cameras, lacking the telephoto lens present on much of the competition. It can also struggle to keep the top-end Snapdragon 8 Elite cool, especially when gaming.
The most significant compromise is undoubtedly battery life, as the 6.7-inch QHD+ screen is simply too much for the small 3900mAh cell, resulting in a struggle to last all day.
That said, if you’re willing to compromise and possibly carry around a power bank, the experience of using the S25 Edge is unlike anything else on this list.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207621
Excellent and brighter external display
Solid camera performance
Unique finish options
Smooth performance
Only 3 years of Android OS updates
Moto AI still needs work
No telephoto lens
Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip line might’ve popularised the modern clamshell foldable, but it’s not the best around. That award goes instead to the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra.
While this year’s release doesn’t reinvent the wheel compared to the 50 Ultra, the refinements are meaningful. A tougher titanium hinge and improved IP48 dust and water resistance make it more durable where it counts.
That core experience remains slick and satisfying, and given that this is the best flip phone we’ve tested, that’s high praise. The standout feature remains the generous 4-inch cover screen, which handles both widget and full Android apps with ease, letting you do more without flipping it open.
When you do open it, you’re treated to a vibrant 7-inch pOLED display wth Pantone Validated for spot-on colour accuracy. It’s a great panel for everyday use, and while the crease hasn’t vanished, it’s shallower and far less distracting than what rivals offer.
Under the hood, you’ll find the Snapdragon 8 Elite, paired with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage as standard. Battery life similarly impresses, lasting all day without a charge, and 68W fast charging tops it up in under an hour.
Yes, Motorola’s combination of three OS upgrades and four years of security patches lags behind Samsung’s seven OS upgrade promise, but overall, it’s the most capable and polished clamshell you can buy right now.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207648
Lightest book-style foldable around
Ultra thin design makes it really nice to use
Larger, wider, wholly more useful screens
Same main camera as Galaxy S25 Ultra
Relatively small 4400mAh battery
Slow 25W wired charging
Zoom camera could be better for the price
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 marks a genuine leap forward for Samsung’s book-style foldable, finally delivering the ultra-slim, lightweight design many have been waiting for.
Shedding much of the bulk and weight of its predecessors, the 4.2mm-thick Fold 7 is now among the thinnest foldables around, and at 215g, it’s both lighter than the book-style competition and even the Galaxy S25 Ultra. It makes it a joy to handle, and it’s almost unnoticeable in the pocket as a result.
Samsung has also nailed the usability of both displays this year. The wider 6.5-inch cover screen is genuinely practical for everyday tasks, while the 8-inch internal panel feels more solid with a way less intrusive crease. Both screens are bright, vibrant and ideal for everything from gaming to multitasking.
Camera performance is another highlight, with the main 200MP sensor borrowed from the S25 Ultra delivering sharp, detailed shots that put the Fold 7 on par with regular bar phones. General performance is equally impressive, thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite and up to 16GB of RAM.
Battery life and charging remain the main drawbacks with a 4400mAh cell and 25W charging falling far behind rivals. Still, for most users, the Fold 7 will comfortably last a day, and the overall package is compelling enough to make it the standout book-style foldable of 2025.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207783
Incredible performance
Excellent speakers
Slick professional design
Awesome LED lighting effects
Very expensive
Cameras aren’t the best
Charging could be quicker
The Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition may not be the most rounded Android phone on this list, but it excels at its main point of interest: gaming.
There are oodles of gaming-centric features here, from the AirTriggers that allow for gamepad-esque controls to the Armoury Crate software that enables you to fiddle with the performance settings and display frame rate, temperature and GPU workload figures as you play your favourite mobile games.
The real highlight is the Snapdragon 8 Elite found within. When combined with Asus’ top-notch internal optimisations including an impressive cooling system that sustains gameplay for way longer than regular smartphones, you’ve got one of the most powerful Android phones you can buy.
That’s all well and good, but plenty of gaming phones offer similar performance-focused features. Where the ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition stands out is in the design department by, well, not looking like a gaming phone at all.
Instead, the phone looks not too dissimilar from your regular flagship smartphone with a glass and matte frosted finish on the rear, slimmed down bezels and even a 3x telephoto camera to bolster the rear camera setup. There are still a few gamer-centric design features, like the AniMe panel that can display text, graphics and more, but that disappears from view when not in active use.
The only major stumbling block for this phone is that it’s incredibly expensive, requiring a sum beyond the £1000/$1000 mark. As a result, it may be worth sacrificing a couple of features and opting for the older Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (with a fairly similar spec) instead.
Best battery life of any Pixel
Clean, more understated look
Great camera performance
Premium AI features
Thick screen bezels look dated
No dedicated zoom lens
Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips
Slow charging
The Pixel 9a is a compact Android phone with an excellent camera, Google’s fantastic software and a price tag that won’t break the bank.
The Pixel 9a breaks tradition and sports a different look to the flagship Pixel 9, ditching the iconic camera bar for a near-flush dual camera housing. Combined with its flat edges and flat screen, it’s a joy to hold and use, though it does have that plasticy feel on the rear.
The Pixel 9a also has an impressive camera setup. Its new 48MP primary camera, like those that came before it, is capable of capturing excellent images in various lighting conditions and accurately captures skin tones. Google really does continue to dominate the mid-range camera space.
Then there are all the AI smarts; in addition to all the AI features on previous ‘a’ series devices, including Best Take, Magic Editor and Magic Eraser, you’ll benefit from the Add Me tech introduced on the Pixel 9 last year. There are other AI-infused elements throughout the OS too, allowing the phone to transcribe recordings and even take calls for you in certain regions.
Plus, with a whopping seven years of OS upgrades guaranteed, it’ll continue to get even more features and functionality over time. That’s a massive boost compared to the three or four upgrades you’ll get from competitors, if you’re lucky.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207452
Advertisement
FAQs
Should I buy a 5G phone?
While not vital, all phones featured in our chart offer 5G, so they are futureproofed.
What’s the best Android phone?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is the best Android phone available right now.
Which Android phone has the best camera?
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is currently our top pick, though the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and iPhone 16 Pro Max are close runners-up.
Test Data
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
OnePlus 13
Honor Magic 7 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition
Google Pixel 9a
Geekbench 6 single core
1865
2886
2891
3123
2981
2524
2828
2318
3055
1652
Geekbench 6 multi core
4144
9515
8764
9493
8318
9220
8552
8828
9658
3801
Max brightness
3000 nits
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1 hour video playback (Netflix, HDR)
6 %
–
5 %
–
7 %
–
6 %
8 %
6 %
1 %
30 minute gaming (light)
11 %
7 %
6 %
–
6 %
16 %
5 %
7 %
10 %
6 %
Time from 0-100% charge
80 min
62 min
91 min
–
89 min
76 min
80 min
87 min
46 min
108 min
Time from 0-50% charge
24 Min
20 Min
29 Min
–
36 Min
25 Min
39 Min
31 Min
18 Min
40 Min
30-min recharge (included charger)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
76 %
–
15-min recharge (included charger)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
39 %
–
30-min recharge (no charger included)
62 %
70 %
52 %
–
43 %
61 %
40 %
49 %
–
40 %
15-min recharge (no charger included)
29 %
35 %
30 %
–
24 %
33 %
23 %
24 %
–
22 %
3D Mark – Wild Life
2511
6680
–
6647
6574
–
6294
5574
5948
2597
GFXBench – Aztec Ruins
44 fps
78 fps
–
60 fps
106 fps
76 fps
105 fps
70 fps
138 fps
66 fps
GFXBench – Car Chase
53 fps
77 fps
–
60 fps
118 fps
82 fps
95 fps
71 fps
160 fps
79 fps
Full Specs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Review
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Review
OnePlus 13 Review
Honor Magic 7 Pro Review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Review
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Review
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition Review
Google Pixel 9a Review
UK RRP
£1099
£1249
£1299
£899
£1099
£1099
£1099.99
£1799
£1299
£499
USA RRP
$1099
$1299
–
–
Unavailable
$1099
–
$1999
$1499
$499
EU RRP
–
–
–
–
€1299
–
–
–
–
–
Manufacturer
Google
Samsung
Xiaomi
OnePlus
Honor
Samsung
Motorola
Samsung
Asus
Google
Screen Size
6.8 inches
6.9 inches
6.7 inches
6.8 mm
6.8 inches
6.7 inches
7 inches
8 inches
6.78 inches
6.3 inches
Storage Capacity
128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
256GB, 512GB, 1TB
512GB, 1TB
256GB, 512GB
512GB
256GB, 512GB
512GB
256GB, 512GB, 1TB
1TB
128GB, 256GB
Rear Camera
50MP + 48MP + 48MP
200MP + 50MP + 50MP + 10MP
50MP + 50MP + 200MP + 50MP
50MP + 50MP + 50MP
50MP + 50MP + 200MP
200MP + 12MP
50MP + 50MP
200MP + 12MP + 10MP
50MP + 32MP + 13MP
48MP + 13MP
Front Camera
42MP
12MP
32MP
32MP
50MP
12MP
50MP
10MP + 10MP
32MP
13MP
Video Recording
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IP68
IP68
IP69
IP69
IP68
Not Disclosed
Not Disclosed
IP68
IP68
Battery
5060 mAh
5000 mAh
5410 mAh
5998 mAh
5270 mAh
3900 mAh
4700 mAh
4400 mAh
5800 mAh
5100 mAh
Wireless charging
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
–
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Fast Charging
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
–
Yes
Yes
Yes
–
Size (Dimensions)
76.6 x 8.5 x 162.8 MM
77.6 x 8.2 x 162.8 MM
75.3 x 9.4 x 161.3 MM
76.5 x 8.5 x 162.9 MM
77.1 x 8.8 x 162.7 MM
75.6 x 5.8 x 158.2 MM
74 x 7.1 x 171 MM
143.2 x 4.2 x 158.4 MM
76.8 x 8.9 x 163.8 MM
73.3 x 8.9 x 154.7 MM
Weight
221 G
218 G
226 G
210 G
223 G
163 G
199 G
215 G
227 G
186 G
ASIN
–
B0DPR5MYZ9
–
–
B0DQ5JLVJP
–
B0F68G1YR8
–
–
B0DSWFHTL2
Operating System
Android 14
OneUI 7 (Android 15)
HyperOS 2 (Android 15)
OxygenOS 15
MagicOS 9 (Android 15)
OneUI 7 (Android 15)
Android 15
OneUI 8 (Android 16)
Android 15
Android 15
Release Date
2024
2025
2025
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2024
2025
First Reviewed Date
21/08/2024
30/01/2025
02/03/2025
07/01/2025
17/01/2025
23/05/2025
20/05/2025
17/07/2025
19/11/2024
10/04/2025
Resolution
1344 x 2992
1440 x 3120
3200 x 1440
1440 x 3168
1280 x 2800
1440 x 3120
2992 x 1224
2184 x 1968
2400 x 1080
1080 x 2424
HDR
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
165 Hz
120 Hz
185 Hz
120 Hz
Ports
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C
USB-C x2, 3.5mm headphone port
USB-C
Chipset
Google Tensor G4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Google Tensor G4
RAM
16GB
12GB, 16GB
16GB
12GB, 16GB
12GB
12GB
16GB
12GB, 16GB
–
8GB
Colours
Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian
Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray
Black, White, Silver Chrome
Black, Blue, White
Lunar Shadow Grey, Breeze Blue, Black
Titanium Silver, Titanium Jetblack and Titanium Icyblue
Pantone Rio Red, Pantone Cabaret, Pantone Mountain Trail, Pantone Scarab
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Wolfbox G900 Pro: One-minute review
The Wolfbox G900 Pro is a mirror-style dash cam that records 4K forwards and 2.5K video rearwards. The weatherproof rear camera can be screwed to your vehicle’s bumper, turning into a reversing camera. A live video feed from either camera, or both, can be seen on the touchscreen display, which is integrated in the mirror itself.
Both cameras produce excellent, high-quality video, and the user interface is a joy to use – it’s sharp, responsive and intuitive. The Wolfbox app also works well, with videos transferred quickly via 5 GHz Wi-Fi from the dash cam to your phone, although transferring footage directly from the included microSD card isn’t an option for macOS users, due to how the card is formatted by the dash cam.
Installation is more involved than with other dash cams, and the separate GPS antenna creates extra clutter that you’ll likely want to hide. The design of the G900 isn’t perfect, as I found that its camera was partially blocked by the mirror assembly of some vehicles. This is a dash cam to try (or at least measure carefully) before you buy.
(Image credit: Future / Alistair Charlton)
Wolfbox G900 Pro: Price & availability
The Wolfbox G900 Pro is priced at $360 in the US and £260 in the UK, although discounts are often available. At the time of writing, the US price on Amazon had fallen to $250.
Unlike some other dash cams, like the Nextbase iQ and Nexar One, the Wolfbox does not have a 4G connection and there are no ongoing data subscription or cloud storage costs.
Wolfbox G900 Pro: Specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Wolfbox G900 Pro specs
Video
4K (3840 x 2160) at 30fps (front), 2.5K (2560 x 1440) rear
Field-of-view (FoV)
170 degrees (front), 150 degrees (rear)
Storage
microSD card slot (128GB card included)
GPS
Yes, plug-in antenna (included)
Parking mode
Yes, with hardwiring kit (sold separately)
App support
Yes, Wolfbox app
Dimensions
12.0 x 3.0 x 1.5 inches / 305 x 80 x 45mm
Weight
17.5 oz / 497 g
Battery
No
Wolfbox G900 Pro: Design
Doubles as replacement mirror
Perfect fit isn’t guaranteed
Forward view easily obstructed
Unlike dash cams that stick to the windshield, the Wolfbox G900 Pro acts as a replacement to your car’s central rearview mirror. It straps onto your existing mirror, and gives you both a reflected view of what’s behind, plus a view ahead recorded by the forward-facing camera.
This is made possible because there’s a touchscreen embedded within the G900 Pro’s mirror. The result is a mirror that still shows a clear view of what’s behind, but can also, with a tap to wake up the user interface, show live video from the front- and rear-facing dash cams.
It’s also possible to swipe and tap your way through the G900 Pro’s settings menus, and view recorded footage on the mirror/touchscreen, before transferring it to your smartphone using the Wolfbox app and the G900 Pro’s Wi-Fi connection.
(Image credit: Future / Alistair Charlton)
As well as the main unit, the kit reviewed here included a rear-facing camera that can either be stuck to your rear window with an included adhesive pad or, since it’s weatherproof, screwed to the rear bumper. Here, it doubles as a rear-facing dash cam and also a reversing camera, with its live video feed sent to the display of the main unit.
It’s also possible to wire the rear camera to your car’s reversing light. Then, when the light illuminates the dash cam automatically shows a feed from the rear camera. The main unit is powered from an included 12-volt adapter, but Wolfbox also sells an optional hardwiring kit for a permanent power supply.
(Image credit: Future / Alistair Charlton)
Wolfbox G900 Pro: Performance
Lots of messy cables to hide
Excellent 4K video
Isn’t suitable for some cars
Despite being very different to most other dash cams, the G900 Pro is still relatively easy to install and set up. The main unit attaches to your mirror using a pair of included rubber straps, and is powered from the 12-volt lighter socket in the usual way.
The dash cam has GPS but, unusually for a modern, high-end dash cam, the antenna is not integrated. Instead, the GPS unit is a small box that attaches with a cable and then sticks to the windshield or dashboard. It’s a disappointing bit of hardware design, given the otherwise top-notch specifications of this dash cam. The GPS unit takes up space, the cable needs to be hidden somewhere, and it’s generally a bit of a mess.
I also found the main unit didn’t fit my car’s mirror well. The camera is fitted to the left-hand side of the mirror, which in my car meant having to install the G900 Pro off-center, thus leaving a bit of my car’s original mirror poking out from behind the dash cam. Worse still was how the camera’s forward view was partially obscured by the car’s mirror mount. I could improve the camera’s view, but this meant moving the mirror to an angle where it was no longer giving the view I needed.
(Image credit: Future / Alistair Charlton)
For my own car, a 2015 Mazda MX-5 ND (Miata in the US market), this made the G900 Pro a non-starter. It also shook while driving, and considerably so while stationary with the engine running. The car’s own mirror doesn’t do this, but the constant shaking of the Wolfbox’s mirror and digital interface became a considerable distraction.
Hoping the Wolfbox would perform better elsewhere, I switched it to my partner’s Peugeot e-208. Being an electric car, most of the shaking I‘d experienced in my car disappeared, and being a larger vehicle meant the G900 Pro could be installed without looking too messy. The separate GPS module is still an annoyance, though, and some of the camera’s view ahead was still blocked by the car’s own mirror assembly.
It’s a shame some of the camera’s view is blocked, because the G900 Pro produces excellent 4K footage. It’s honestly some of the best I’ve ever seen from a dash cam, and is arguably on par with a GoPro or other action camera. There’s loads of detail, colors are accurate, and everything is nice and smooth.
The rear camera is almost as good. It has a lower 2.5K resolution, but still does a great job of capturing plenty of accurate detail.
The G900 Pro’s user interface is also impressive. The display is bright, sharp, and responsive, with an intuitive menu system that makes it easy to adjust settings. Wolfbox’s smartphone app is also good.
(Image credit: Future / Alistair Charlton)
The setup process is quick and 5 GHz Wi-Fi makes video transfers speedy too – a good thing, since this dash cam formats its microSD card using a file system unreadable by macOS. I reformatted the card, using my Mac, to exFAT, but the dash cam still insisted on reformatting it. Footage transfers via the app just fine, but it can’t be moved directly from the SD card to a Mac, so you’re forced to use the app.
Recordings viewed in the app also show the car’s location on a map, plus a G-force indicator. This doesn’t seem accurate though, as it often indicated 0.8g of acceleration at 0.0 mph. Some data, like the map, altitude and the G-meter, are lost when recordings are transferred to your phone’s camera roll, and I noticed how the speedometer was slightly delayed when compared to the footage.
I also encountered an issue where the map that accompanied each recording (provided by Apple Maps) was blank. This was rectified by granting the Wolfbox app constant access to my iPhone’s locational data.
Back to the positives, and I’m sure some drivers will love how this dash cam doubles as a rearview mirror. If you drive a van, for example, or any vehicle with limited rear visibility, seeing the rear-facing camera’s feed on the mirror can be really useful.
I can’t really see the point of the G900 Pro constantly showing the front-facing camera’s view, since that’s the same as looking through the windshield, but thankfully it’s easy to either show the rearview only, or have no camera feed at all. In that state, the G900 Pro acts like a conventional mirror, but with a simple interface showing the time and date in one corner.
Wolfbox G900 Pro: Sample video
Should you buy the Wolfbox G900 Pro?
(Image credit: Future / Alistair Charlton)
Buy it if…
Don’t buy it if…
How I tested the Wolfbox G900 Pro
I installed the G900 Pro in two different cars
I used the front and rear cameras on several journeys
I used the Wolfbox app and analyzed recorded footage
To thoroughly test the Wolfbox G900 Pro I installed it in two different cars. The first showed how this mirror-style dash cam doesn’t work perfectly in some vehicles, while the latter cast it in a better light. I completed numerous journeys with both cars, then transferred footage to my phone and computer for a closer look.
The Nebula Mars II Pro by Anker is a cute, tiny portable projector.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Anker’s Nebula Mars II Pro is a surprising little portable mini projector. And I do mean little. It’s small enough to hide completely under a six-pack of Coke. With built-in streaming and a battery good for around three and a half hours of projection, the Mars II Pro is a great companion for a movie night in the backyard or somewhere farther afield. And in addition to being a projector, it’s also a big Bluetooth speaker.
Like
Compact size
Built-in battery lasts up to 3.5 hours
Surprisingly loud speakers
Don’t like
Worse brightness and contrast than home projectors
Inaccurate color
Limited app store
Requires charging brick
Video quality will be good enough for many viewers, but compared with a similarly priced home projector it’s far dimmer, with worse contrast ratio and color accuracy. Compared with other tiny, battery-powered projectors however, the image is very watchable and speakers sound surprisingly powerful.
The main reason to get the Mars II Pro is if you want ultra-portable video, especially outdoors. It’s easy to put near a wall or screen and stream some Netflix within minutes, anywhere. If you plan to use it regularly in the same room inside, however, you’re probably better off with a more traditional projector.
Editor’s note, Dec. 1: Due to its performance, size and price, we’re giving the Nebula Mars II Pro our Editors’ Choice award as our favorite portable projector. While there are newer portable mini projectors that are brighter and easier to use, the ones that outperform this Anker — like the Xgimi Halo Plus — are also more expensive. The Mars II Pro is a great all-around projector for the price.
Basic specs
Native resolution: 1,280×720 pixels
HDR-compatible: No
4K-compatible: No
3D-compatible: No
Lumens spec: 500
Zoom: None
Lens shift: None
Lamp life (Normal mode): 30,000 hours
The Mars II Pro is smaller than you might think. It would fit easily inside any backpack with plenty of room to spare for a water bottle, hoodie or camera. Anker could have made the carrying strap out of cheap-feeling plastic, but has a faux-leather top and is soft underneath. It’s nice to touch.
There are buttons on the top for all the basic functions, but no controls for zoom or focus. This is logical since there’s no zoom and focus is automatic. An integrated slide-open lens cap also turns the projector on and off.
To get a 100-inch image, the Mars II Pro needs to be about nine feet from the screen. Resolution is 720p, which is pretty low for a projector these days and lower than the competing ViewSonic M2, which is 1080p. The LED lamp is rated at 30,000 hours.
Max brightness is a claimed 500 lumens. I measured about 37 nits, which calculates out to about 337 lumens. For comparison, the ViewSonic M2 produces 349 lumens by my measurements, while the slightly more expensive, but far less portable, Optoma HD146X puts out around 1,146.
Anker claims the internal 12,500-mAh battery is good for about three and a half hours viewing time, and about that long to charge back up again. If you keep it in the high brightness mode, that drops to one and a half hours. If you’re just using the Mars II as a Bluetooth speaker, Anker claims about 30 hours for audio-only playback.
Though not specifically mentioned as a feature by Anker, some apps treat the Mars II Pro as a mobile device, so you can actually download shows to its 8GB internal storage.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Connectivity and convenience
HDMI inputs: 1
USB port: 1
Audio input and output: 3.5mm output
Digital audio output: None
Wi-Fi: 802.11a/b/g/n
Remote: Not backlit
There is one HDMI input, which is plenty on a projector like this. The USB port lets you stream content from a USB memory stick, or you can charge a device (like your phone), using the Mars II Pro’s beefy battery.
That’s it for physical connections, other than the power port, which requires a separate power brick. That’s a bummer: I’m a hardliner “everything portable should charge via USB.” If you want to charge the projector away from home, you’ll have to pack the brick too.
The Mars II Pro’s runs Android 7.1, which puts all the streaming capability inside the PJ. So all you need is to tether the projector to your phone or connect to some available Wi-Fi.
You don’t get the full Google Play Store, however, or even Android TV. Instead, it’s Aptoide, a sort of culled or curated version of the Play Store. It’s a bit of a liability with the ViewSonic M2, and it’s no better here. There’s Netflix, YouTube, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, Disney Plus and others you may or may not recognize. There’s HBO Nordic and HBO Go, but no US HBO or HBO Max. Chromecast is not supported. Overall it’s not bad, but you might not be able to find every service you’re used to.
The remote is wafer thin, but not backlit. That’s fine because you’re probably not going to use it. Instead, there’s the Anker Connect app (Android and iOS), which connects easily and does all the same things. In fact, some of the apps actually require the app. Control in the projector’s menus works fine, but it’s a bit clunky in the Netflix app for instance. Not a big issue, but it could be smoother.
There are two side-firing 10-watt speakers and a rectangular passive radiator in the front. That doesn’t sound like much, but it’s fairly loud and the sound quality is better than I expected from such a small device. This is one of the few projectors I’ve actually turned down to achieve a normal listening level.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Picture quality comparisons
I compared the Mars II Pro to the ViewSonic M2, another portable projector, and the Optoma HD146X, a traditional plug-in PJ. The M2 is very similar to the Anker, can run off a battery and also runs apps from the Aptoide store. The Optoma is a very different projector, and only a direct competitor in one sense: price.
I have a feeling the Mars II Pro might attract the attention of someone not typically interested in projectors, so the Optoma is here as an example of what similar money can get you in a non-portable, standard projector. I connected these via a Monoprice 1×4 distribution amplifier and viewed all on a 102-inch 1.0-gain screen.
Top view with carrying strap
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
First up is brightness. The M2 and Mars II are remarkably similar. Their light outputs and contrast ratios are basically identical. In both cases, this amount is “fine.” Considering the size and their ability to run off batteries, somewhere around 300 lumens is acceptable. When creating a 100-inch image that equates to about 37 nits. That’s enough for a watchable, albeit dim, image. You’re better off moving the Anker closer, which will create a smaller but brighter image.
The Optoma, on the other hand, is significantly brighter than either one. On a same size screen I measured over 127 nits, which is over five times brighter than the Mars II. The Optoma is much more watchable at 100 inches. And if you use the Optoma’s most color accurate mode, it’s still twice as bright as the other two.
And we definitely need to talk about color. The Mars II Pro has some of the least accurate colors of any projector I’ve ever reviewed. Blue is the only color out of the three primary and three secondary colors that is accurate. Green is oversaturated. Yellow isn’t but is quite greenish-yellow. Magenta is oversaturated and too blue. The result looks like you’ve got the color control a few ticks above where it should be. It’s not weird, per se, and overall it still looks better than the M2, but overall it’s definitely more Speed Racer than The Grand Budapest Hotel.
Side by side with the Optoma, it’s night and day. Or at least Technicolor and Kodachrome. The Optoma isn’t super accurate itself, and actually errs on the side of being undersaturated, but its colors look far more natural than the Anker.
Unlike the Optoma, the Mars II doesn’t have extensive picture settings. It has two. You can adjust the color temperature: Normal, Cool and Warm, and even the most accurate (Warm) is still way too cool. You can adjust the lamp settings: Standard, Battery and Auto. Standard is its brightest. Battery is dim but gets you that three-plus hour view time. Auto switches between the two other modes depending on whether or not the projector is plugged in. That’s it. No brightness, contrast, tint. One result is that you can’t adjust contrast to restore clipped details in bright whites.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Contrast ratio, like the brightness, is acceptable given the category. I measured an average of 354:1 across all modes. That seems low, and it is, but the majority of sub-$1,000 projectors are only two or three times that. The high end of that performance range, the BenQ HT2050A is 2,094:1. The ViewSonic is basically the same as the Anker, at 376:1. The Optoma is 568:1.
The Anker’s image lacks punch but not as much as you might think. In fact, because the Anker’s black level is a little lower than the M2 it looks a little better. The M2 is very slightly brighter, which isn’t noticeable. That black level is even lower than the Optoma, but that projector is so much brighter this edge isn’t relevant.
Lastly we come to detail. Both the M2 and HD146X are 1080p to the Anker’s 720p. On a 100-inch screen this is most noticeable if you’re close enough to notice the individual pixels, which are fairly large. If you shrink the image down to 60-80 inches, it looks detailed enough that it doesn’t look soft.
Conclusion
Honestly, I wasn’t expecting much from the Mars II Pro. I’ve been underwhelmed with most battery-powered portable projectors I’ve reviewed. I’ve also found that companies not known for video gear tend to miss some important things when it comes to projectors. For instance, picture quality.
Overall I’m impressed that Anker got a lot right with the Mars II Pro. At least when graded on the curve of price, size and battery power. Compared with an average home projector it comes up short in every performance metric, so If you’re looking for something that will never stray too far from an outlet, you’re better off with a more “traditional” projector. But if you want something portable to watch movies outside, the Mars II Pro has a great design, sounds good, is easy to use and has a more watchable image than the ViewSonic M2 — all for less money.
As well as covering TV and other display tech, Geoff does photo tours of cool museums and locations around the world, including nuclear submarines, massive aircraft carriers, medieval castles, airplane graveyards and more.
You can follow his exploits on Instagram and YouTube, and on his travel blog, BaldNomad. He also wrote a bestselling sci-fi novel about city-sized submarines, along with a sequel.
It wasn’t that long ago that if you wanted high-end features on your phone then you would have to part with sizeable sums to match, but that’s no longer the case. The best mid-range phones continue to raise the bar with innovation at wallet-friendly prices.
While there’s always going to be an audience for the type of high-end handsets that appear in our best smartphones list, the sector that really shows off just how far smartphones have come is at the mid-range level. We are surprised each year with just how much value companies are able to bring to consumers who don’t want to spend more than £699/$699 on their next upgrade.
Nowadays, it’s perfectly acceptable to anticipate a certain standard over overall usability with mid-range phones, such as a reasonably fast chipset and eye-catching display. Beyond that, you have the ability to pick and choose with features you prefer the most. If you’re going to take a lot of pictures then there are definite standouts in that category, just as there are instant winners when it comes to offering massive amounts of battery life. We know as much because we put all of these phones through our rigorous testing process.
Every aspect of a phone is brought under scrutiny when used by one of our tech experts. No stone is left unturned as everything from screen brightness to battery drain when streaming is tested and documented. This ensures that all of our reviews stand as a comprehensive guide to the phone in question, so you won’t be left with any burning questions before deciding which device to buy.
Of course, if you do want to opt for something further down the pricing scale then you may be better suited by our list of the best cheap phones. Alternatively, if you’re looking to narrow your upgrade to a specific brand then we also have the current rankings of the best Samsung phones and the best Google Pixel phones.
For more smartphone related guides, check out our breakdowns of the best camera phone, best gaming phone, best Android phone, best iPhone, best Samsung phone and recommended SIM deals.
Advertisement
Best mid-range smartphones at a glance
SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST
How we test
Learn more about how we test mobile phones
All the devices in this list have been thoroughly tested and used by one of our expert reviewers. We don’t review a phone purely on specs or benchmark scores and we use them as our everyday device for the review period, which is usually at least five days but often a lot more.
When we review a phone our expert will put their personal SIM card into the phone, sync across their most-used apps and log into all their typical accounts. We do this so you’ll feel confident in our review and trust our verdict.
Our review process includes a mixture of real-world tests, along with more than 15 measured tests and industry-standard benchmarks
Pros
Outlandish performance
Exceptionally fast charging
Excellent 144Hz display
Cons
New ‘Deco’ aesthetic
No charger included
Ads baked into the OS
Pros
Excellent for gaming
Brilliant battery life
Improved design
Cons
Ultrawide camera is weak
No wireless charging
Alert slider could do more
Pros
Best battery life of any Pixel
Clean, more understated look
Great camera performance
Premium AI features
Cons
Thick screen bezels look dated
No dedicated zoom lens
Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips
Slow charging
Pros
Decent telephoto for the money
Fresh Essential Key implementation
Design still something special
Cons
New camera module somewhat ugly
Performance not outstanding for the money
Sluggish camera app
Pros
Speedy performance from the Snapdragon 8 Elite
Big, vibrant 120Hz display with fast response times
Proper zoom lens adds versatility to the camera system
Battery refills in about half an hour
Cons
Regular Wi-Fi connection issues
Ultrawide camera is poor
HyperOS remains a cumbersome Android skin
120W charging doesn’t quite charge as fast as expected
Pros
Sleek, grown-up looks
Wonderfully efficient
Gorgeous OLED screen
Cons
AI camera features can leave images feeling quite synthetic
MagicOS 9 may be a divisive distro of Android
Pros
A welcome update to the entry-level iPhone
All the Apple Intelligence features
Nice design for the price
Great battery life
Cons
A large selection of missing features, like MagSafe
Single rear camera is a bit limiting in 2025
The iPhone 16 isn’t that much more expensive
Pros
Gorgeous metal and glass build
Lovely screen with slim bezels
Long software promise
Solid camera performance
Cons
More expensive than last year
Junk macro lens
No Galaxy AI-branded features
Pros
Feels like a flagship
Big camera upgrades
Relatively speedy
Useful AI features
Cons
Significant price hike
No more SD card support
Ultrawide camera isn’t great
Pros
Incredibly competitive price for the spec
Multi-day battery life
Big, bright screen
Cons
Cameras remain a weak point for Poco
HyperOS is packed full of bloatware
Outlandish performance
Exceptionally fast charging
Excellent 144Hz display
New ‘Deco’ aesthetic
No charger included
Ads baked into the OS
If you’re looking for a smartphone that brings you as close to the flagship experience as possible without dropping flagship smartphone levels of cash, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is your best option.
The 6.67-inch CrystalRes AMOLED screen is a treat for the eyes with its pixel-packed 1.5K resolution and 144Hz refresh rate, offering superb visuals with inky blacks and vibrant colours helped by support for 12-bit colour depth that makes it fantastic for both binging movies and gaming.
The latter is certainly possible with the 14T Pro, sporting MediaTek’s top-end 2024 chipset, the Dimensity 9300+, with benchmark results competing, if not beating, much of the flagship competition. That’s paired with 16GB of RAM and up to 1TB of storage.
Camera performance is also a treat, sporting a 50MP main, 50MP ultrawide and a 12MP 2.6x telephoto, sharing the main camera with the flagship Xiaomi 14. Its Leica-powered shots look detailed and vibrant, with solid low-light performance to boot.
Throw in a 5000mAh battery that’ll last all day and support for super-fast 120W fast charging that delivers a full charge in 23 minutes and you’ve got a solid all-rounder that’s easy to recommend to most.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10179495
Excellent for gaming
Brilliant battery life
Improved design
Ultrawide camera is weak
No wireless charging
Alert slider could do more
The OnePlus 13R is a solid attempt at a mid-range smartphone that manages to stand out in a busy market with a smattering of genuinely high-end tech.
The display is one of the main reasons to opt for the phone. While the 6.78-inch AMOLED screen isn’t quite as pixel-packed as the flagship OnePlus 13, it boasts the same 120Hz refresh rate and, rather importantly, LTPO 4.1 tech.
Along with the OnePlus 13, it’s one of the first phones on the market to sport the tech, which allows the phone to adjust the refresh rate as you scroll. This means that the screen feels super responsive in use and, crucially, it’s way more battery-friendly.
That also means that, combined with a sizeable 6000mAh silicon carbon battery that’s larger than any other phone in our chart, the OnePlus 13R has superb battery life, easily able to last a day if not two depending on what you’re up to. Even then, with 80W SuperVOOC charging it’ll get a full charge in 52 minutes.
It’s also a decent performer with the 2024 flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, especially when coupled with OnePlus’ various software and hardware optimisations and upgraded cooling mechanisms. It’ll leave practically any other mid-ranger in the dust, both in benchmarks and real-world use.
Elsewhere, it has a solid 50MP primary and 2x telephoto cameras, though the 8MP ultrawide isn’t quite as exciting. It also won’t get as many updates as the Pixel 8a, capping out at four OS upgrades and six years of security patches.
Best battery life of any Pixel
Clean, more understated look
Great camera performance
Premium AI features
Thick screen bezels look dated
No dedicated zoom lens
Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips
Slow charging
Google’s mid-range ‘a’ series has long dominated when it comes to camera performance, and this year’s Pixel 9a is here to pick up that mantle.
Sporting a refreshed 48MP camera with a larger sensor than that of the 8a, the main lens does an admirable job in practically any lighting condition. Images are always packed with light and detail, with way more accurate colours than other mid-rangers, especially when it comes to skin tones.
That said, Google is losing ground to the Nothing Phone 3a Pro and its dedicated periscope lens, with the 9a still relying on Google’s AI-powered Super Res Zoom, but it does a decent enough job when you want to close the gap.
There’s also a 13MP ultrawide lens that, while not as performant as the main lens, is great at capturing scenic vistas during the day.
It’s not just a great camera phone of course; the Pixel 9a sports its own unique look for the first time, ditching the iconic camera bar for a near-flush camera housing, and it’s powered by the same Tensor G4 chipset as the flagship too.
Throw in an AI-infused stock Android 15 experience with seven years of OS upgrades, all-day battery life and a solid 6.3-inch screen, and it becomes hard to resist.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207452
Decent telephoto for the money
Fresh Essential Key implementation
Design still something special
New camera module somewhat ugly
Performance not outstanding for the money
Sluggish camera app
The Nothing Phone 3a Pro is the latest mid-ranger from startup Nothing, and it comes with quite the surprising feature considering its £449 price point: a 3x periscope camera. All other zoom lenses at a similar price point are fixed telephoto snappers locked at 2x, whereas the 3a Pro’s OIS-enabled snapper can deliver rich and sharp images at the 10x mark and beyond.
The primary 50MP camera also delivers performance above what you’d expect for the price, utilising Google’s Ultra XDR magic to boost the dynamic range of shots to deliver stunningly rich and vibrant results. However, it’s let down by a weak 8MP ultrawide that can’t quite match the performance of the other lenses.
It’s not just a great camera phone, either; it’s also one of the more unique-looking phones on the market. Its transparent glass rear shows stylised cables and other internal components, along with Nothing’s signature Glyph LED tech. That look also translates to the software in the form of the heavily stylised Nothing OS 3.1.
What it isn’t, however, is a powerhouse. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 is fine for day-to-day tasks and closely mirrors the performance of the year-old Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, but it’s left behind by the Pixel 8a and Poco X7 Pro.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207410
Speedy performance from the Snapdragon 8 Elite
Big, vibrant 120Hz display with fast response times
Proper zoom lens adds versatility to the camera system
Battery refills in about half an hour
Regular Wi-Fi connection issues
Ultrawide camera is poor
HyperOS remains a cumbersome Android skin
120W charging doesn’t quite charge as fast as expected
If you’re after the best performance possible without spending flagship prices, look no further than the Poco F7 Ultra.
The Poco F-series has always led the way in performance in the mid-range space, but this year’s Ultra model takes things a step further with the inclusion of the Snapdragon 8 Elite. That’s the most powerful chipset on the market at the moment, and the chipset of choice for practically every flagship Android phone on the market.
As such, the Poco F7 Ultra can handle practically anything you can throw at it, delivering faster speeds and better gaming performance than any other phone mentioned in our chart in both benchmark tests and real-world use. If you’re a keen mobile gamer wanting to get the most out of your smartphone, this should be of serious consideration.
It’s not just a powerhouse either; it sports a 6.7-inch 120Hz AMOLED screen with a pixel-packed WQHD+ resolution – the same as the top-end Galaxy S25 Ultra – and a 5300mAh battery that’ll keep you going all day without much complaint.
If you want a super-fast phone for as little money as possible, the Poco F7 Ultra is the phone to go for.
Sleek, grown-up looks
Wonderfully efficient
Gorgeous OLED screen
AI camera features can leave images feeling quite synthetic
MagicOS 9 may be a divisive distro of Android
The Honor 400 Pro may be one of the pricier phones on our list at £699, but if you want a top-notch viewing experience and flagship-level AI smarts, it may well be worth it.
The Honor 400 Pro sports a 6.7-inch curved AMOLED screen that’s every part flagship, with a 120Hz refresh rate, 5000nits peak brightness and advanced eye comfort tech. It makes for a great viewing experience, whether gaming or bingeing a movie.
The main draw of the Honor 400 Pro is its impressive AI capabilities, offering pretty much every AI feature present on the company’s top-end Magic 7 Pro.
That includes both Honor-developed AI features like Magic Portal alongside new Google AI features like Photo to Video, the first smartphone to offer the tech. It’s easily the most versatile phone in this list when it comes to AI.
Elsewhere, the Honor 400 Pro boasts an impressive camera experience headed by a 200MP main camera and flanked by 50MP telephoto and 12MP ultrawide snappers. The hardware is impressive, and Honor uses AI trickery like AI Super Zoom to further boost performance – though results are hit-and-miss.
It’s also a powerhouse with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 that was the flagship chip of choice just a year ago, and with a 5300mAh silicon-carbon battery, it has no issue lasting a day or two on a single charge.
There’s very little to dislike, though again, it’s one of the more premium mid-range options available.
A welcome update to the entry-level iPhone
All the Apple Intelligence features
Nice design for the price
Great battery life
A large selection of missing features, like MagSafe
Single rear camera is a bit limiting in 2025
The iPhone 16 isn’t that much more expensive
Until recently, the iPhone 15 sat as our go-to Apple recommendation within this list, sitting right at the ceiling of our cut-off point with a price tag of £699/$699. However, with the iPhone 16e now on the market, Apple finally has a handset that fits more in line with the pricing of most mid-range phones.
While the iPhone 16e doesn’t topple the likes of the Pixel 8a on smartphone photography, or the OnePlus 13R where the display is concerned, its value proposition lies in giving you a high-end iOS experience at a price that’s much cheaper (£200/$200 to be exact) than the iPhone 16.
Despite being the cheapest option in the iPhone 16 range, the 16e still boasts the same A18 Bionic chipset as the standard 16 and the iPhone 16 Plus, so you’re not missing out in terms of day to day performance. Apps load quickly, Apple Arcade titles run beautifully and more. Plus, you’ve got access to Apple Intelligence.
While Apple’s take on AI isn’t worth the upgrade alone at the time of writing, we no doubt anticipate that it’ll be at the heart of Apple’s software strategy in the near future, and the iPhone 16e should get access to those same updates as soon as they become available.
In the here and now though, the iPhone 16e’s allure is still in the sleek nature of iOS and apps like Apple News and Apple TV which are very accessible, beautifully designed and feature-rich. There’s also an abundance of helpful widgets that you can add to your homescreen, and the seamless way in which iPhones interact with other Apple devices is unparalleled in the Android space.
Where the iPhone 16e does suffer is in all of the things it’s missing, including MagSafe compatibility, a second rear-facing camera and Apple’s Dynamic Island, all of which can be found on the iPhone 15 which in turn can be found for not that much more if you know where to look.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207301
Gorgeous metal and glass build
Lovely screen with slim bezels
Long software promise
Solid camera performance
More expensive than last year
Junk macro lens
No Galaxy AI-branded features
Some mid-range phones can feel a little bit cheap in the hand – often down to the use of materials like plastic over the metal and glass alternative usually found on truly high-end phones – but Samsung’s Galaxy A56 5G is the polar opposite.
Much like the flagship Galaxy S25, the Galaxy A56 is made from an aluminium frame and a glass rear, instantly making it feel more premium in the hand than the likes of the Nothing Phone 3a Pro and Google Pixel 9a.
It’s also impressively slim, measuring in at an increasingly rare 7.4mm thick despite housing a 6.7-inch screen and a large 5000mAh battery that makes it feel great to use, especially combined with the device’s flat edges.
It’s not just a looker either; the 6.7-inch AMOLED screen is a treat for the eyes, with much slimmer bezels than the competing Pixel 9a, and even with the same triple camera setup as the Galaxy A55, it’s still surprisingly solid in the camera department.
It’s powered by the mid-range Exynos 1580 that, while not in the same league as the Snapdragon 8 Elite of the Poco F7 Ultra, provides solid everyday performance. That’s backed up by OneUI 7, Samsung’s spin on Android 15, with a 5000mAh battery that won’t struggle to last all day on a charge.
It’s a solid all-rounder with a premium design that won’t disappoint.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207377
Feels like a flagship
Big camera upgrades
Relatively speedy
Useful AI features
Significant price hike
No more SD card support
Ultrawide camera isn’t great
As soon as you pick up the Oppo Reno 13 Pro, any sense that this phone feels like anything less than a flagship device simply melts away.
The plastic frame of yesteryear has been replaced by a sturdy glass and aluminium backing, which is then complemented by IP69 dust and water resistance, letting you know that the phone is unlikely to be taken down by the elements anytime soon.
There’s also the super fast MediaTek Dimensity 8350 under the hood, which makes general day-to-day use feel not at all dissimilar to what you’ll find on pricier options within our best smartphones list. If you’re concerned about having a phone that can keep up with the latest games then you might be better off picking up the Poco F7 Ultra, but when it comes to social media, multitasking and more, you won’t be feeling hard done by.
Just like almost every other manufacturer nowadays, Oppo has also made sure to embolden the Reno 13 Pro with plenty of AI features to lure in potential adopters. Thankfully, these features don’t feel half-baked like what we’ve found from Moto AI or Honor AI, Instead providing helpful quality of life concepts such as AI Speak, which can analyse a webpage and read it back to you.
The main 50MP camera can pump out some really great shots under the right conditions, and there’s an 8MP ultra-wide too.
Incredibly competitive price for the spec
Multi-day battery life
Big, bright screen
Cameras remain a weak point for Poco
HyperOS is packed full of bloatware
There are plenty of great options on this list that excel when it comes to overall camera prowess, battery life and more, but if what you value above all else is day to day speed and super fast processing then the Poco F7 is something of a mid-range powerhouse.
Thanks to a winning combination of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and 12GB RAM to keep it running steady, the Poco F7 features some of the best everyday performance you’re going to find at this end of the market, easily outdoing the Pixel 9a and the Samsung Galaxy A56 in several of our tests. Not only is this great for professionals who quickly dip from one app to another, but also gamers who want a smooth experience with classic titles like Call of Duty Mobile.
Luckily there’s a hefty battery that can keep up with the Poco F7’s ambitions of higher than average processing speeds. Under the hood there’s a 6500mAh cell, and even when pushing the battery with a more intensive day than usual over the course of the review, we still struggled to have it drop below the halfway mark, so it’s hard to imagine not being able to get two days of use at a time unless you’re really going all in on some gaming.
That battery life also goes a long way with the phone’s 6.8-inch AMOLED display. It’s exactly the type of panel that’s a joy to use when it comes to streaming films and TV shows, so if you’re the type of person who prefers to use their phone as their main source of entertainment on a flight or a train journey, then the Poco F7 is a great option to have on your person.
As a final point, even though this is still a mid-ranger, you won’t have much to worry about when it comes to longevity. There’s an official IP68 dust and water resistance rating here, which is always handy for peace of mind, particularly if you’re using your phone whilst on holiday and it accidentally gets drenched by other holidaymakers taking a dive into the nearby pool.
The team at Trusted Reviews defines mid-range smartphones as any handset costing ideally under £700/$700. We raised our definition in 2022, following a gradual rise in prices in the top end of the market.
Are mid-range phones good?
Over the last few years, the mid-range phone market has blossomed, with key companies including Google, Xiaomi, OnePlus, Oppo and Samsung creating mid-range handsets with features traditionally reserved for flagship devices. Recent highlights have included 5G connectivity, high refresh rate screens and improved rear camera sensors. The team of experts at Trusted Reviews recommend most users consider a mid-range smartphone before investing in a flagship as a result.
Are there 5G mid-range phones?
5G is a given in the mid-range market in 2025 with Samsung, Oppo, Motorola, OnePlus and Google having mid-range phones supporting the connectivity.