What’s new with the mid-ranger?

What’s new with the mid-ranger?

The OnePlus Nord CE5 is a tempting budget-focused phone – but what’s new compared to last year’s OnePlus Nord CE4?

Aside from the fact that the Nord CE5 is being launched much wider than the CE4, which didn’t launch in the UK or Europe, this year’s smartphone offers an upgraded design, new screen features, and more.

However, there are still a few surprising similarities between the two, and even areas where the year-old Nord CE4 outperforms the CE5, which could affect your buying decision.

We’ve reviewed the OnePlus Nord CE5, but we’ve not yet spent any time with last year’s Nord CE4 given its limited availability. That said, here’s how the two compare on paper, complete with our impressions of the newer model. 

Pricing and availability

The OnePlus Nord CE5 is now available for purchase in the UK and Europe, following its announcement in early July 2025. It is priced at £249/€319 with 128GB of storage, with an additional 256GB option available at an extra cost.

Advertisement

The OnePlus Nord CE4, on the other hand, had a much more limited release back in 2024, available only in regions like India in both 128- and 256GB configurations. Neither are available in the US, however, so our American friends should look elsewhere.

The Nord CE5 offers a cleaner look and improved durability

The OnePlus Nord CE5 is a step forward in terms of design – though of course, that’s a matter of personal opinion. 

It’s much more minimalistic than last year’s Nord CE4, with flat edges, a completely flat rear and even a flat screen. This is very much on-trend with smartphones in 2025, with the rounded rear and slightly curved screen of the Nord CE4 looking comparatively dated to most. 

OnePlus Nord CE5OnePlus Nord CE5
OnePlus Nord CE5. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

As a result, the Nord CE5 feels more refined and comfortable in the hand, and the addition of an IP65 rating means it’s better protected against dust and water than the CE4, which doesn’t have an official IP rating. 

Advertisement

This should make the CE5 a bit more reassuring for everyday use, especially in less-than-ideal conditions – and paired with the phone’s upgraded Aqua Touch 2.0 screen tech, it should be easy to use in the rain too. 

The Nord CE5’s screen is brighter and flatter

The Nord CE5 features a flat 6.77-inch FHD+ AMOLED display, while the Nord CE4 has a slightly curved screen of roughly the same size and resolution. 

The shift from curved to flat screens changes the look and feel of the phone, with the CE5 offering a more modern, understated look that reduces accidental touches along the sides, which can be an issue with curved screens like that of the Nord CE4.

OnePlus Nord CE4OnePlus Nord CE4
OnePlus Nord CE4. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

On the other hand, the CE4’s curved screen offers a more immersive wraparound effect that some find visually striking and undoubtedly premium. It’s largely down to personal preference. 

Brightness is another area where the CE5 boasts an improvement, offering 1300nits peak brightness compared to the CE4’s 1100nits. That should make the CE5 easier to use in bright light while also making HDR content pop that little bit more than the CE4 – though there isn’t that much in it. 

Advertisement

Elsewhere, both displays sport a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling, but the CE5 adds features like Ultra HDR support, the aforementioned Aqua Touch 2.0 and PWM dimming for reduced eyestrain. 

The Nord CE5 offers better performance

Performance is another area where the Nord CE5 makes notable strides. It’s powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Apex chipset, paired with 8GB of RAM and either 128- or 256GB of storage, which brings it closer to the Nord 5 in terms of power. 

Either way, it’s a big step up from the Nord CE4’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and 8GB, and that should translate to a generally speedier experience largely free of lag and stuttering.

OnePlus Nord CE5OnePlus Nord CE5
OnePlus Nord CE5. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The Nord CE5 also boasts a 7041mm² CryoVelocity capor chamber cooling system – the largest in its price class according to OnePlus. This should help keep the phone running cool when performing demanding tasks, such as high-end gaming, while reducing the need to throttle the chipset’s power to lower temperatures. 

Both offer the same camera hardware

When it comes to the all-important cameras, the Nord CE4 and CE5 are surprisingly similar.

Advertisement

Both phones are equipped with a 50MP main sensor featuring OIS, along with an 8MP ultrawide camera and a 16MP selfie camera on the front. Both phones also support 4K video recording at 60fps, although unlike the full-fat Nord 5, this feature is limited to the rear snappers.

OnePlus Nord CE5OnePlus Nord CE5
OnePlus Nord CE5. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Instead, much of the differences come down to software improvements. There will likely be differences in performance between the ISPs, with slight variations in elements like colour balance and noise reduction, but there are also features like upgraded live photo smarts that are exclusive to the newer model.  

The Nord CE4 has a bigger battery and faster charging – in Europe, anyway

The Nord CE5 does offer a marked improvement in battery life with a whopping 7100mAh cell – but due to EU regulations on battery capacities, it’s not available in Europe. Instead, those in Europe are treated to a much smaller 5200mAh cell – and that makes it smaller than the 5500mAh alternative from the Nord CE4. 

OnePlus Nord CE4OnePlus Nord CE4
OnePlus Nord CE4. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

That’s not the only difference either; the Nord CE4 offers the faster charging of the two phones at 100W, compared to the CE5’s 80W. In practice, this should mean that the Nord CE4 provides a full charge faster than the Nord CE5 despite offering a larger battery.

Advertisement

Early thoughts

The OnePlus Nord CE5 looks to be a big step forward for the CE collection, offering a more modern, flat design and IP65 rating for improved durability. Its brighter, flatter screen and upgraded performance also provide a marked improvement over what’s offered by the older Nord CE4. 

While the camera hardware remains largely consistent with the Nord CE4, new software features and improved tuning could translate to a better day-to-day shooting experience.

Interestingly, however, the Nord CE4 boasts advantages when it comes to battery capacity and charge speeds – for those in Europe where the Nord CE5 is limited to 5200mAh, anyway.

That said, we’ll reserve final judgement for once we’ve spent more time with both phones.

Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour review: a curiosity that should really be free

Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour review: a curiosity that should really be free

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Review information

Platform reviewed: Nintendo Switch 2
Available on: Nintendo Switch 2
Release date: June 5, 2025

The conversation around interactive-visit-come-video-game Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour, rather unfortunately, has not been about the game itself. Rather, many players have (rightly so) lamented the fact that this is a paid download rather than a pack-in experience – similar to the likes of Wii Sports or even Astro’s Playroom on PlayStation 5.

That being said, Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour remains one of the top downloads on the Switch 2 eShop – at least here in the UK – so folks are certainly buying it. The question is, then, is it worth the $9.99 / £7.99 you’ll end up paying for it? Well, yes and no.

Epson Home Cinema 5050UB: Big, Bold and Beautiful

Epson Home Cinema 5050UB: Big, Bold and Beautiful

The Epson Home Cinema 5050UB is a serious home theater projector for serious home theater enthusiasts. It features a motorized lens with horizontal and vertical lens shift, plus ample zoom. Its 4K enhancement technology offers lots of detail. Its biggest benefit over less expensive 4K projectors, however, is an excellent contrast ratio for deep, dark shadows and bright, popping highlights.

Like


  • Superb overall picture quality


  • Excellent contrast ratio


  • Motorized lens


  • Ample lens shift and motorized zoom

Don’t like


  • Could be quieter


  • Chonkers

There are only a few disappointments, and they’re minor. It doesn’t quite have the color or razor-sharp detail of its direct competitor, the LG HU810P. That’s not to say the 5050 isn’t sharp and colorful. It is, just a bit less so — although I liked the Epson’s overall picture quality a lot more than that of the LG. The 5050UB is also an absolute unit, several times larger than most of the projectors I’ve reviewed in the last year (including the LG).

In sum, the Home Cinema 5050UB is an excellent all-around projector that looks fantastic with all content. It offers a significant step up in picture quality over less expensive projectors, like the Optoma UHD35, and costs a lot less than something like the Sony VPL-VW325ES. It even gives its more expensive, laser-powered sibling, the LS11000, a run for its money. More on that below. Overall, the Epson 5050 is my go-to choice for anyone with a dedicated home theater who wants a projector worthy of the space.

Editor’s note, November 2022: For its excellent picture and value, we’re once again giving the 5050 our Editor’s Choice award. While the laser-powered LS11000 offers some additional benefits and performance over the 5050, it’s also a lot more money.

epson-5050-2-of-10

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Specs 4(K) days

  • Native resolution: 4K enhancement (1,920×1,080 x2)
  • HDR-compatible: Yes
  • 4K-compatible: Yes
  • 3D-compatible: Yes
  • Lumens spec: 2,600
  • Zoom: Motorized (2.1x)
  • Lens shift: Motorized H/V
  • Lamp life (Medium mode): 4,000 hours

The 5050UB is a 4K- and HDR-compatible projector. As such, it can accept 4K and HDR signals, though keep in mind that no projector can do HDR very well

Like all Epson projectors the 5050UB uses an LCD light engine, not the DLP that’s found in most other projectors. The ones used on the 5050UB are not technically 4K native resolution. Instead, they’re a technology called “4K enhancement” that “shifts each pixel diagonally to double Full HD resolution,” according to Epson. This is done very quickly, so it’s just a higher-resolution image to the eye. Here’s a deeper dive into the technology. The short version: It looked plenty sharp to me, if not quite as razor-like as the DLP-powered LG; see below for details.

One of the 5050’s most notable features that sets it apart from less expensive projectors is a motorized lens. This offers ±96.3% vertical and ±47.1% horizontal movement, which should be enough to let the 5050 fit in just about any home. There’s also a significant motorized zoom of 2.1x. 

Watch this: Six things to know about home theater projectors

Epson claims the 5050UB can produce 2,600 lumens. I actually measured slightly more than that… in the less accurate Dynamic color mode. In the more accurate Bright Cinema mode I measured roughly 192 nits, or about 1,732 lumens. This puts it among the brightest projectors we’ve ever measured. 

Lamp life is on the low side. Even in the Eco mode, Epson rates it at up to 5,000 hours. Some projectors of similar brightness we’ve reviewed in the last year were capable of upward of 15,000 hours in their most lamp-conserving modes. That said, 5,000 hours is still over three years of use at four hours a night.

epson-5050-9-of-10

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Connectivity

  • HDMI inputs: two HDMI 2.0
  • PC input: Analog RGB
  • USB ports: 2
  • Audio input and output: No
  • Digital audio output: No
  • Internet: LAN
  • 12v trigger: Yes
  • RS-232 remote port: Yes
  • Remote: Backlit

Both HDMI inputs are HDMI 2.0 and can accept up to 4K60. As you might expect from its intended use as a projector for a dedicated theater, it lacks an audio out. Epson assumes, rightly in my opinion, that anyone getting a 5050 would have a traditional projector arrangement with either a receiver or at least a soundbar for audio.

Along the same lines, there are lots of control options for home automation systems, including a 12-volt trigger, RS-232 and a LAN port.

The remote is a big boy (just like the projector it controls) and has a pleasant amber backlight. If you have a 2.35:1 screen, as I do, you might reach for this remote for more than just on and off, since you can zoom the projector and fill the screen with 2.35:1 content without getting off the couch. That’s always a bonus.

epson-5050-6-of-10

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Picture quality comparisons

LG HU810P

The LG HU810P is the most notable competition for the 5050. They’re the same price but the HU810P uses newer technology, namely two lasers and a phosphor instead of the 5050’s more traditional lamp. I connected both using a Monoprice 1×4 distribution amplifier, and viewed them side-by-side on a 12-foot-wide 1.0-gain screen.

Right off the bat, both are great projectors, but their strengths and weaknesses are almost polar opposites.

As far as light output goes, they’re very similar. In their respective most accurate modes, the LG can do 166.3 nits to the Epson’s 192. Objectively, that’s a fair bit of difference, but subjectively, side-by-side, they both just look bright. So we’ll call that more or less a tie.

Color, though, goes to the LG. The lasers, with help from a phosphor, are absolutely deeper and richer. Throw on some HDR content and the deep crimson reds and vibrant purples are far beyond what the 5050UB can produce. This is sort of like saying a Porsche is slower than a Ferrari, however, since the 5050UB is no slouch in the color department. On its own it looks great, the LG in this regard looks better. 

epson-5050-8-of-10

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

It’s a similar story with detail. The LG uses a 4K DLP chip to create an image, and detail is that technology’s main strength compared to LCD with pixel shifting, which is what Epson uses. The image just looks a little sharper, especially with motion. However, if you’re not watching them side by side, I’m not sure you’d notice. The 5050UB certainly doesn’t look soft, it’s definitely 4K to my eye. 

The next aspect of picture quality is where the tide turns toward the Epson by a lot. In a word, or technically two: contrast ratio. Even without using its iris, the native contrast of the 5050UB’s three LCD chips is significantly higher than the LG — 10 times higher. So the image has significantly more punch and is less washed out. Even if you dial the LG’s lasers and iris back as much as possible, it only just matches the Epson’s black level while that projector is in its brightest and most color temperature-accurate mode. 

Which is to say, the Epson’s black levels are roughly the same while at the same time (in the same mode) it is capable of having highlights or bright parts of the same image that are seven times brighter than when the LG’s lasers are dialed all the way down and the iris is closed. Flipping that around, if you match their light outputs, the Epson’s black levels in the same mode are nine times darker. 

epson-5050-10-of-10

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

What does this look like? An easy example is watching any movie with letterbox bars. If I set the projectors to be roughly the same brightness overall, the letterbox bars on the LG are gray. If I match their letterbox bars by reducing the LG’s laser power and closing its iris, it ends up looking dim compared to the Epson.

So when watching any content, the deep blacks of the 5050UB, while maintaining bright highlights, make for an extremely pleasing image. 

Comparison to the Epson Home Cinema LS11000

While reviewing Epson’s own LS11000, I compared it to the 5050. The LS11000 is $1,000 more expensive, and uses a laser instead of the 5050’s UHP lamp. Since there will be no lamp replacements for the life of the projector, the total ownership cost difference between these two projectors is less than it initially appears.

A front view of Epson LS11000 projector

The Epson LS11000.

Geoff Morrison/CNET

Sharpness is one of the most noticeable differences between these two. The LS11000’s pixel shift quadruples the pixels from its 1080p chips, so it’s 1080pX4 compared to the 5050’s 1080pX2. So between those two projectors the LS11000 is definitely sharper, which makes sense because it has twice the resolution. Both are less detailed than a 4K DLP, but sharpness is that technology’s biggest strength.

Contrast is a different story, and a surprising one. I measured the 5050’s contrast ratio at 5,203:1 vs. the LS11000’s 1,808:1, which is significantly worse. Even the LS11000’s dynamic contrast is lower, where the laser power tracks the brightness of incoming video signal and adjusts accordingly. However, this mode is more useful on the LS11000, since this adjustment happens pretty much instantly, far faster than the mechanical iris on the 5050. So even though the numbers suggest the 5050 blows the LS11000 away, subjectively and side-by-side they’re fairly comparable. That’s impressive, especially since the 5050 is cheaper and far older.

With SDR the LS11000 looks a little better and has more natural color. With HDR the LS11000 does a better job reproducing a wider color gamut. However, the difference isn’t huge in either case.

Epson Home Cinema LS11000

Geoff Morrison/CNET

All told, the LS11000 is a diagonal step from the 5050. Overall it does look better, but not the 25% better implied by its price. However, if you include the “total cost of ownership,” which in this case means $330 lamps every 2.5 years or so with the 5050, the price is eventually roughly the same. So with a bit better performance and that laser keeping the ownership costs in check, the LS11000 is worth considering if you’re looking at the 5050, despite being, on paper, $1,000 more expensive.

For more, read our in-depth Epson Home Cinema LS11000 4K laser projector review.

Charge your friends admission

The Home Cinema 5050UB is an excellent projector. At $3,000 it’s certainly not cheap, but for those looking to buy a PJ for a dedicated home theater or a light-controlled living room that can do its black levels justice, the image quality is definitely a step above less expensive projectors. Is it, say, over twice as good as the $1,300 Optoma UHD35? Perhaps. The Optoma is very good for the price, but that’s certainly the caveat: “for the price.” It holds its own, but it has a way worse contrast ratio and doesn’t handle HDR nearly as well as the Epson. 

I think most people would be perfectly content with the UHD35. But for enthusiasts looking for a more “home cinema” experience the… oh wait, I just said the name of the thing in the thing. Let me try that again. For those looking for a more “home theater” experience, the Epson Home Cinema 5050UB does just about everything right and looks fantastic.

Geek Box

Test Result Score
Black luminance (0%) 0.046 Average
Peak white luminance (100%) 192.3 Good
Derived lumens 1732 Good
Avg. grayscale error (10-100%) 7.624 Poor
Dark gray error (20%) 6.223 Average
Bright gray error (70%) 7.432 Poor
Avg. color error 3.636 Average
Red error 3.527 Average
Green error 2.199 Good
Blue error 4.345 Average
Cyan error 5.111 Average
Magenta error 2.461 Good
Yellow error 4.173 Average
Avg. saturations error 8.34 Poor
Avg. color checker error 8.5 Poor
Input lag (Game mode) 28.4 Good

Measurement notes

I found the Bright Cinema color mode offered the best combination of light output and accuracy. In the six-color temperature mode, the 5050UB was pretty spot on D65 across the grayscale range. In addition, all primary and secondary colors were spot on their Rec. 709 targets. This is one of the most accurate projectors we’ve reviewed in the last year. 

The native contrast ratio was excellent for a projector, with an average of 5,203:1 across various modes. For comparison, the second best contrast ratio we’ve measured recently was the BenQ HT2050A with a native contrast ratio of 2,094:1.

With the lamp mode (called Power Consumption) set to High and the iris off, the 5050UB puts out an impressive 192.3 nits, or roughly 1,732 lumens. The Eco mode drops the light output by about 30%. If you turn on the iris, which opens with bright images and closes with dark images, the dynamic contrast ratio rockets up beyond 100,000:1.

While the Bright Cinema mode looked better overall, the Cinema mode offered wider colors for HDR content. However, it was also much dimmer. I didn’t find the ~10% greater color gamut for ~60% less light to be a worthy trade-off, but feel free to check it out. The contrast ratio was about 40% better in this mode as well, which was only slightly noticeable. 

If you need even more light, the Dynamic color mode puts out an impressive 323.6 nits, roughly 2,914 lumens, though the overall image isn’t as good or accurate. 

The definitive ranking from our tech experts

The definitive ranking from our tech experts

When it comes to buying a new phone in 2025, choice is abundant out there. This can be great for consumers of all budgets, but it does mean that you can spend a lot of time obsessing over the details. To avoid all that, our experts have you covered with the definitive list of the best phones you can buy right now.

If you’re a regular reader of Trusted Reviews then you’ll know that we’ve been testing the latest phones for over 20 years, so not only do we know exactly what makes a great phone, we’re always aware of how a new line-up compares to the old guard. For instance, on the surface, the Galaxy S25 looks almost identical to the Galaxy S24, but there are a few differences afoot and we’ve put them through their paces to discover the impact that they make.

Whenever we get a phone in for testing, we always use it as our primary device over the course of the review, taking notes not just about big ticket concerns like the overall usability and the prowess of the cameras, but also key metrics like the battery drain after streaming Netflix for half an hour, or the single-core performance in chipset benchmarking.

All of this data combines to ensure that our reviews provide you with the best possible understanding before you decide to buy the phone in question.

You may also want to take a gander at the current crop of best smartwatches to get even more out of your handset.

Whatever you decide to buy, there’s a good chance that it’ll be discounted as part of Amazon’s Prime Day sale. In previous years, we’ve seen everything from iPhones to budget handsets bestowed with a reduction or two, so you can almost guarantee that the latest handsets will feature once again in Amazon’s annual sale.

Advertisement

Which is the best smartphone to buy in 2025?

SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST

Learn more about how we test mobile phones

Every phone included in the below list has been properly tested and used for an extended period by one of our product experts. We don’t review phones based purely on specs or a manufacturer’s claims – we use them as our everyday devices for at least five days and usually for much longer.

If you read a phone review on Trusted Reviews, you’ll know the reviewer has popped their personal SIM card into the phone, transferred across their most-used apps and even their backlog of WhatsApp messages. We go all in, so you know you’re getting an honest view of a product.

Our review process includes a mixture of real-world tests, along with more than 15 measured tests and industry-standard benchmarks. We believe this gives the most rounded view of a device. The scores a phone receives from a run under our professional colourimeters aren’t worth much if the screen can’t be used comfortably on a sunny day.


  • Redesigned chassis feels good in the hand

  • Oodles of power under the hood

  • Excellent camera performance

  • Gorgeous display with super-slim bezels


  • Much of the camera hardware remains unchanged

  • Battery doesn’t last as long as 2025 rivals

  • New Galaxy AI features are limited

Forget just being a great Android phone, there are enough bells and whistles in the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra to make even the best iPhones jealous. This is a beast of a smartphone, and while its starting price of £1249/£1299 does make it quite an investment compared to the competition, if you do want the best out there then this is it.

Admittedly, the overall amount of upgrades compared to the Galaxy S24 Ultra are relatively small, so if you currently own that phone (or even the Galaxy S23 Ultra) then Samsung’s latest flagship might not warrant an immediate swap. However, one key change that is welcome is the bump to a 50MP ultrawide lens.

Sitting alongside the three other rear-facing lenses, this new and improved ultrawide offers up more detailed landscape shots, making them appear more eye-catching and less washed out than before. Of course, those other sensors are still firing on all cylinders as the S25 Ultra excels in everything from zoom photography to close-up portraits.

The bezels have also been shaved down to make the screen slightly larger at 6.9-inches. This makes Samsung’s Ultra phone better than ever for streaming films on the go or indulging in a spot of gaming, as the screen draws you in with greater effect.

The inclusion of the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chip brings about a huge boost of power too, including new Galaxy AI features such as Now Brief which can analyse your day and give you key bits of contextual information when the AI feels you’ll benefit from it the most.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207165


  • Exceptional battery life

  • Larger screen with impossibly thin bezels

  • Top-end processing power

  • Impressive video quality


  • Apple Intelligence isn’t that smart or widely available

  • Camera Control is awkward to use

  • Very expensive

If you’re looking for a true flagship phone and have settled on iOS as your operating system of choice, you’re going to be looking at the iPhone 16 Pro Max – the current best iPhone on the market.

Though it may not look all that different to its predecessor, the iPhone 16 Pro Max comes with a host of small, yet meaningful upgrades. The 6.7-inch 120Hz OLED screen has increased to a whopping 6.9 inches, though without much of an expansion of the overall footprint thanks to much slimmer bezels. Seriously, this thing has some of the slimmest screen bezels on the market.

Not content with the customisable Action Button, the iPhone 16 Pro Max also features a Camera Control button with a touch-sensitive surface that lets you swipe to zoom, change modes and more, as well as take the actual photo. However, the idea is better than the execution, with a less-than-ideal placement of the button that makes using it awkward.

It’s also impressively powerful with the A18 Pro chipset at its heart, delivering benchmarks that beat every single other smartphone in our chart, making it the most powerful smartphone around right now – and that’s reflected in everyday performance.

The A18 Pro also powers the new Apple Intelligence functionality, but none of the killer AI features are available just yet, and the functionality is also limited to US owners right now – so don’t be fooled by Apple’s worldwide AI marketing push.

Throw in solid camera performance with a new 48MP ultrawide alongside the returning 48MP main and 12MP 5x telephoto lenses and true all-day battery life and you’ve got the best iPhone to date.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10187761


  • Redesigned chassis looks way more modern

  • Holistic, genuinely helpful approach to AI

  • Amazing photo and video capabilities

  • All-day battery life


  • Second price hike in two years

  • Can get hot when gaming

  • Tensor G4 isn’t much more powerful than the G3

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a fantastic Android phone that, even with a price rise for a second year, still undercuts rivals like the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra when it comes to price while offering a comparable experience.

Google’s latest flagship, launched alongside the new compact Pixel 9 Pro and regular Pixel 9, ticks just about all the boxes our reviewers look for in a phone that ends up on this list. It has a great 6.7-inch Super Actua screen with a smooth adaptive 120Hz refresh rate and impressive max brightness that makes it easy to use in daylight, accompanied by a refreshed design with flat edges, rounded corners and even a redesigned camera housing that makes it look slick.

But the biggest reason to opt for the Pixel 9 Pro XL is the camera performance. Our reviewer was very impressed with the photography skills of this phone, praising its true-to-life skin tones, colours and crisp nature of images. It handles skin and pictures of faces better than the iPhone 16 Pro, or Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, and delivers a better-quality digital zoom too.

That’s thanks to Google’s usual suite of photo-focused AI tools and functions like Super Res Zoom and Magic Eraser, but it goes so much further than that.

Using the latest Tensor G4, the Pixel 9 Pro XL can run Google Gemini on-device for a faster, more responsive experience, and it boasts several key new features like the ability to search for content in screenshots, generate images, summarise calls (in the US, anyway) and much more. It really does permeate the entire OS, offering a more holistic approach to AI than much of the competition.

But while it powers the upgraded AI experience, the Tensor G4 isn’t quite as capable as the competing Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and that means the phone can get pretty toasty when gaming. Still, it’s power efficient enough to deliver solid all-day battery life without scrambling for a charger by the evening.

Oh, and did we mention that it’ll get seven years of OS upgrades too? Because it will.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10187772


  • Exceptional battery life

  • Impressive performance

  • Top-end screen

  • Versatile camera setup


  • Issues with camera focus and halo effects

  • More bloatware

  • Limited AI smarts compared to some brands

For a good while it was the Oppo Find X8 Pro that held this spot, and while that phone does still excel in the battery department, it’s the OnePlus 13 that truly floored us in testing. On the surface, the phone’s 6000mAh cell is already impressive, particularly at a time when battery sizes are decreasing amidst some flagship phones, but it’s the performance of that cell that really hits home.

In our testing period with the OnePlus 13, we genuinely struggled to deplete the battery completely over the course of an intensive day of use. Just for context, half an hour spent playing Mario Kart Tour resulted in a battery drop of only 4%.

What this means is that if you’re a heavy smartphone user who still wants some juice left in the tank by the end of the day, or you’re the type of person who wants to see their phone last into a second day under moderate use then the OnePlus 13 has you covered.

Luckily, this phone isn’t a one-trick pony either as beyond the outstanding battery life, there are tons of other features to appreciate including a versatile camera set-up that’ll have you prepared for almost any lighting scenario, as well as unbelievable performance that comes courtesy of the Snapdragon 8 Elite.

The 6.82-inch AMOLED display is also a joy to use, still featuring that same OnePlus look where the sides fall over the edges for a wonderful sense of immersion. It doesn’t necessarily outdo the OnePlus 12 by a wide margin, but the OnePlus 13 is still a great phone overall.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207250


  • Incredible performance

  • Excellent speakers

  • Slick professional design

  • Awesome LED lighting effects


  • Very expensive

  • Cameras aren’t the best

  • Charging could be quicker

If you want the best possible phone for playing games on the go, our top recommendation is the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition.

Performance is a top priority for gamers, which is why Asus has gone all-out with the Snapdragon 8 Elite and a whopping 24GB of RAM. Combined with Asus’ proprietary internal cooling tech and the optional cooler that straps to your phone, the ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition delivered consistently solid performance even in high-end demanding mobile games like Genshin Impact.

It’s the gaming-specific features that really stand out though, with the AirTriggers allowing you to use and hold the phone like a gamepad, while the Armoury Crate software allows you to display the frame rate and optimise performance settings. Honestly, there’s a bevvy of optional accessories for the phone to customise the experience to your liking.

Like its predecessor, the ROG Phone 9 Pro doesn’t really look like a gaming phone – though the telltale signs are there if you really look. The LED-powered AniMe Vision screen is back, though with a massive increase to the LEDs taking the total up to 648 LEDs, allowing it to display graphics, text and even battery levels via the back of the phone. Elsewhere, though, it’s very toned-down for a gaming phone, something that’ll likely appeal to more casual mobile gamers.

We also appreciate the slimline bezels on offer from the gaming phone, and the camera performance isn’t terrible for a gaming phone even if it pales in comparison to the likes of the Galaxy S24 Ultra, helping it justify that top-end price tag.

That said, costing well over £1000/$1000, this is a seriously expensive phone. Those who want a more versatile phone may want to look elsewhere, as the camera quality is still behind that of the competition. But if you fancy a gaming phone that doesn’t look like a gaming phone, there is no better choice than the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition.


  • A joy to use and hold

  • Uncompromising flagship screen

  • Plenty of power

  • Solid camera performance


  • Battery struggles to last a single day

  • Relatively slow 25W charging

  • No dedicated zoom lens

  • Gets warm rather easily

If you want an ultra-slim, lightweight flagship with a fantastic 6.7-inch AMOLED screen, you’ll find no better than Samsung’s new Galaxy S25 Edge.

At 5.6mm thick and 163g, it’s incredibly thin and light compared to most of the flagship competition, especially big-screen alternatives like the S25 Ultra and iPhone 16 Pro Max, which makes for a fantastic in-hand feel. It’s super light while being durable with a titanium frame and IP68 dust resistance, with no real design compromise to achieve its ultra-slim dimensions.

However, it is very much a design-first smartphone. There are only two cameras, for example, lacking the telephoto present on much of the competition, and it can struggle to keep the top-end Snapdragon 8 Elite cool, especially when gaming.

The biggest compromise is undoubtedly battery life, with the 6.7-inch QHD+ screen simply too much for a small 3900mAh cell, and it struggles to last all day as a result.

That said, if you’re willing to compromise and possibly carry around a power bank, the experience of using the S25 Edge is unlike anything else on this list.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207621


  • Excellent and brighter external display

  • Solid camera performance

  • Unique finish options

  • Smooth performance


  • Only 3 years of Android OS updates

  • Moto AI still needs work

  • No telephoto lens

While the Z Flip from Samsung can be seen as the pioneer of the modern flip phone, the Z Flip 6 isn’t the very best phone we’ve tested with this design. In fact, the best clamshell foldable we’ve reviewed is the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra.

While this year’s foldable may not be dramatically different from last year’s Razr 50 Ultra, it offers improvements where they matter. That includes a more durable build, complete with a new titanium hinge, and upgraded IP48 dust and water resistance.

That said, the core experience is solid, though given that it’s the best around, it’s not much of a complaint. The 4-inch cover screen remains the star of the show, with the ability to run widgets and full Android apps, reducing how often you need to unfold the phone.

When you do unfold, a larger 7-inch pOLED screen will greet you. Sporting Pantone Validation for accurate colours, it’s a great panel for scrolling, browsing and anything else you can think of. The crease is still present, of course, but it’s much shallower and less noticeable than most alternatives.

There’s also a performance boost, up to the flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite, and it ships with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage as standard, making it all the more tempting.

Battery life is also exceptional, never struggling to last all day without needing a top-up, and 68W charging means you can recharge in around 45 minutes.

Sure, its promise of three OS upgrades and four years of security patches falls way behind Samsung’s seven-year guarantee, but we think the experience, on the whole, is among the best you’ll find on the foldable market.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207648


  • Lightest book-style foldable around

  • Ultra thin design makes it really nice to use

  • Larger, wider, wholly more useful screens

  • Same main camera as Galaxy S25 Ultra


  • Relatively small 4400mAh battery

  • Slow 25W wired charging

  • Zoom camera could be better for the price

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 marks a genuine leap forward for Samsung’s book-style foldable, finally delivering the ultra-slim, lightweight design many have been waiting for.

Shedding much of the bulk and weight of its predecessors, the 4.2mm-thick Fold 7 is now among the thinnest foldables around, and at 215g, it’s both lighter than the book-style competition and even the Galaxy S25 Ultra. It makes it a joy to handle, and it’s almost unnoticeable in the pocket as a result.

Samsung has also nailed the usability of both displays this year. The wider 6.5-inch cover screen is genuinely practical for everyday tasks, while the 8-inch internal panel feels more solid with a way less intrusive crease. Both screens are bright, vibrant and ideal for everything from gaming to multitasking.

Camera performance is another highlight, with the main 200MP sensor borrowed from the S25 Ultra delivering sharp, detailed shots that put the Fold 7 on par with regular bar phones. General performance is equally impressive, thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite and up to 16GB of RAM.

Battery life and charging remain the main drawbacks with a 4400mAh cell and 25W charging falling far behind rivals. Still, for most users, the Fold 7 will comfortably last a day, and the overall package is compelling enough to make it the standout book-style foldable of 2025.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207783


  • Best battery life of any Pixel

  • Clean, more understated look

  • Great camera performance

  • Premium AI features


  • Thick screen bezels look dated

  • No dedicated zoom lens

  • Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips

  • Slow charging

If your budget doesn’t quite extend as far as flagships like the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the budget-focused Google Pixel 9a could be what you’re looking for. 

Sporting a clean, understated design with flat edges and no camera bar that separates itself from the flagship Pixel equivalent for the first time, the 9a is a compact 6.3-inch smartphone that looks and feels like a flagship.

That flagship look is backed up by flagship performance in the form of the Tensor G4, also found in the Pixel 9 collection. While Google’s SoC isn’t as performance-focused as alternatives from Qualcomm and co, it provides responsive, snappy, everyday performance while also powering some pretty impressive AI features.

It’s this focus on AI, combined with Google’s stock approach to Android 15, that gives the Pixel 9a its charm. It can do most things that the top-end Pixel flagship can, including the new Add Me functionality, with only a few niche features exclusive to the flagship equivalent. 

It also gets the Pixel flagship’s seven-year OS upgrade promise, almost unheard of in the mid-range market. 

Camera performance continues to be a highlight for Google’s mid-ranger, with a new 48MP main camera that can easily outshine similarly priced phones like the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G. The lack of a telephoto does threaten Google’s dominance, but the digital Super Res Zoom still does the trick up to the 10x mark. 

Battery life is also excellent, not just for the ‘a’ series but for Pixels in general, with a large 5100mAh cell easily getting our reviewer through the day without scrambling for a charger – and that’s not always a given with Pixels. 

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207452


  • Great bright display

  • Good main camera performance

  • Excellent battery life and charging

  • Great IP69 protection


  • Some performance foibles

  • Curved screen is a bit dated now

  • Moto AI isn’t that exciting

  • Apps tray clutter

If your budget doesn’t quite extend to the heights of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and iPhone 16 Pro Max, the £299 Motorola Edge 60 Fusion should be one for serious consideration. Don’t let the budget nature fool you though; this is very much a capable phone that punches above its weight class in many respects.

Measuring 7.9mm thick and 178g, it’s a delight to hold and use, further complemented by either vegan leather rear or silky plastic finish, depending on the colour option you go for, of which there are four colourful options.

That’s further improved by premium features like MIL-STD-810H protection, full IP68 dust and water resistance and a 6.7-inch curved OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate. It’s not quite as snappy as last year’s 144Hz panel, but given that most games can’t hit those kinds of framerates, it seems like a smart downgrade.

The MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is a fairly standard affair at the price point, paired with a generous 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage as standard. As a result, it’s in-line with some of the best cheap performers including the Nothing Phone 3a, never struggling in daily use – though gamers may want to look elsewhere.

Despite its svelte dimensions, Motorola has packed a 5200mAh battery into the phone that doesn’t struggle to last a full day, and with 68W charging, you’ll get a full charge in less than an hour That easily beats the likes of the Pixel 9 Pro XL, iPhone 16 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra in the charging department.

There’s also a 50MP main camera and a 13MP ultrawide camera that perform pretty well in both well-lit and low-light scenarios, and Android 15 with little bloat is another treat. Seriously, what’s not to like?

Advertisement

FAQs

What is a 90 or 120Hz display, and why would I want one?

Most of the phones included within this list feature a high refresh rate display, either at 90Hz or 120Hz. This means the display refreshes at either 90 or 120 times per second, up from the older standard of 60Hz. Having a fast display makes everything feel a bit smoother, be it swiping through Instagram or gaming. The iPhone 16 with its 60Hz display, for example, simply can’t compare to the smooth scrolling you’ll get from the 120Hz iPhone 16 Pro.

Should I buy a phone with 5G?

Most new phones, especially those over £400/$400, will now support 5G. This is the next step up from 4G, and provides faster and more reliable download speeds in areas where the network is live. 5G varies by country, with the USA touting a tech called mmWave that has far superior speeds if you’re in the right spot. While 5G isn’t a must-have yet, it’s always good to futureproof your purchases and as most new phones come with the tech now you likely won’t miss out.

How much should I spend on a phone?

There are excellent phones at all price points these days, with the best often costing above a grand if you want the very best. If you aren’t so fussed about things like camera performance and display quality, you can get an excellent device for £500/$600.

Test Data

  Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Google Pixel 9 Pro XL OnePlus 13 Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Google Pixel 9a Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Geekbench 6 single core 2886 3338 1865 3123 3055 2524 2828 2318 1652 1047
Geekbench 6 multi core 9515 8167 4144 9493 9658 9220 8552 8828 3801 3019
Max brightness 3000 nits
1 hour video playback (Netflix, HDR) 6 % 6 % 6 % 6 % 8 % 1 % 6 %
30 minute gaming (light) 7 % 4 % 11 % 10 % 16 % 5 % 7 % 6 % 8 %
Time from 0-100% charge 62 min 106 min 80 min 46 min 76 min 80 min 87 min 108 min 55 min
Time from 0-50% charge 20 Min 30 Min 24 Min 18 Min 25 Min 39 Min 31 Min 40 Min 25 Min
30-min recharge (included charger) 76 %
15-min recharge (included charger) 39 %
30-min recharge (no charger included) 70 % 50 % 62 % 61 % 40 % 49 % 40 % 61 %
15-min recharge (no charger included) 35 % 27 % 29 % 33 % 23 % 24 % 22 % 33 %
3D Mark – Wild Life 6680 4128 2511 6647 5948 6294 5574 2597 847
GFXBench – Aztec Ruins 78 fps 60 fps 44 fps 60 fps 138 fps 76 fps 105 fps 70 fps 66 fps 17 fps
GFXBench – Car Chase 77 fps 60 fps 53 fps 60 fps 160 fps 82 fps 95 fps 71 fps 79 fps 23 fps

Full Specs

  Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Review Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Review Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Review OnePlus 13 Review Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition Review Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Review Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Review Google Pixel 9a Review Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Review
UK RRP £1249 £1199 £1099 £899 £1299 £1099 £1099.99 £1799 £499 £299.99
USA RRP $1299 $1199 $1099 $1499 $1099 $1999 $499 Unavailable
EU RRP €1449
Manufacturer Samsung Apple Google OnePlus Asus Samsung Motorola Samsung Google Motorola
Screen Size 6.9 inches 6.9 inches 6.8 inches 6.8 mm 6.78 inches 6.7 inches 7 inches 8 inches 6.3 inches 6.67 inches
Storage Capacity 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB 1TB 256GB, 512GB 512GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 128GB, 256GB 256GB, 512GB
Rear Camera 200MP + 50MP + 50MP + 10MP 48MP + 48MP + 12MP 50MP + 48MP + 48MP 50MP + 50MP + 50MP 50MP + 32MP + 13MP 200MP + 12MP 50MP + 50MP 200MP + 12MP + 10MP 48MP + 13MP 50MP main + 13MP ultrawide
Front Camera 12MP 12MP 42MP 32MP 32MP 12MP 50MP 10MP + 10MP 13MP 32MP
Video Recording Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
IP rating IP68 IP68 IP68 IP69 IP68 IP68 Not Disclosed Not Disclosed IP68 IP69
Battery 5000 mAh 4685 mAh 5060 mAh 5998 mAh 5800 mAh 3900 mAh 4700 mAh 4400 mAh 5100 mAh 5200 mAh
Wireless charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Size (Dimensions) 77.6 x 8.2 x 162.8 MM 77.6 x 8.3 x 163 MM 76.6 x 8.5 x 162.8 MM 76.5 x 8.5 x 162.9 MM 76.8 x 8.9 x 163.8 MM 75.6 x 5.8 x 158.2 MM 74 x 7.1 x 171 MM 143.2 x 4.2 x 158.4 MM 73.3 x 8.9 x 154.7 MM 73 x 8 x 161 MM
Weight 218 G 227 G 221 G 210 G 227 G 163 G 199 G 215 G 186 G 178 G
ASIN B0DPR5MYZ9 B0DGHZ1MC2 B0F68G1YR8 B0DSWFHTL2 B0F48H546B
Operating System OneUI 7 (Android 15) iOS 18 Android 14 OxygenOS 15 Android 15 OneUI 7 (Android 15) Android 15 OneUI 8 (Android 16) Android 15 Android 15
Release Date 2025 2024 2024 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025
First Reviewed Date 30/01/2025 13/11/2024 21/08/2024 07/01/2025 19/11/2024 23/05/2025 20/05/2025 17/07/2025 10/04/2025 26/05/2025
Resolution 1440 x 3120 1320 x 2868 1344 x 2992 1440 x 3168 2400 x 1080 1440 x 3120 2992 x 1224 2184 x 1968 1080 x 2424 1220 x 2712
HDR Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 185 Hz 120 Hz 165 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz
Ports USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C x2, 3.5mm headphone port USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Apple A18 Pro Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Google Tensor G4 MediaTek Dimensity 7300
RAM 12GB, 16GB 8GB 16GB 12GB, 16GB 12GB 16GB 12GB, 16GB 8GB 12GB
Colours Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray Black Titanium, White Titanium, Natural Titanium, Desert Titanium Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian Black, Blue, White Black Titanium Silver, Titanium Jetblack and Titanium Icyblue Pantone Rio Red, Pantone Cabaret, Pantone Mountain Trail, Pantone Scarab Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jet-black, Mint Obsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony Pantone Slipstream, Pantone Amazonite, Pantone Zephyr, Pantone Mykonos Blue
Stated Power 45 W 98 W 65 W 25 W 68 W 25 W 23 W 68 W
Alienware 16 Area-51 review: Beauty meets beastly performance

Alienware 16 Area-51 review: Beauty meets beastly performance

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Alienware 16 Area-51: Two-minute review

There are only a few gaming laptop releases that’ll impress buyers this year as much as the Alienware 16 Area-51. Everything about this work of premium art and technology oozes perfection.

Though the configuration I reviewed came out to around $3,249.99 / £3,349 / AU$5,497.80, there’s plenty of scalability in terms of both price and component options, with systems starting at $1,999.99 / £2,149.01 / AU$4,198.70.

BenQ HT2050A Review: Great (Big) Picture for the Money

BenQ HT2050A Review: Great (Big) Picture for the Money

If you’re shopping for a projector between $500 and $1,000, prepare to face a sea of clones. Sizes, designs and even button layouts are often nearly identical from one brand to the next. But there’s something different about the BenQ HT2050A. Although it has a similar price to the competition, it’s larger and there’s a more aesthetically pleasing, curvy design. It looks less like the repurposed business projector and more like something you’d want in your house. And the difference is more than skin deep: This projector’s performance is a step above as well. 

Like


  • Bright picture with great contrast


  • Accurate, realistic colors


  • Lens is shift a rarity at this price

Don’t like


  • Lens shift and zoom don’t adjust far


  • Rainbows, if they bother you

Better
contrast ratio
and color than its counterparts create some of the best picture quality we’ve seen in this price range. Darker blacks, paired with bright whites, all with accurate color, make for a pleasing image. The cherry on top is a small amount of vertical lens shift, which is rare in this price range and almost nonexistent in single-chip
DLP projectors
. This means more people will be able to fit the projector in their homes. In short the BenQ HT2050A is one of the best projectors you can get for the price. 

Editors’ note November, 2022: Despite being several years old, the HT2050A still offers great picture quality for a great price, and remains one of the best deals going for home projectors. It once again earns our Editors’ Choice award.

benq-ht2050a-21-of-12

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

BenQ HT2050A basic specs

  • Native resolution: 1080p
  • HDR-compatible: No
  • 4K-compatible: No
  • 3D-compatible: Yes
  • Lumens spec: 2,200
  • Zoom: Manual (1.3)
  • Lens shift: Manual
  • Lamp life (Normal mode): 3,500 hours

Like the other projectors in this price range, the HT2050A lacks 4K and HDR. It is 3D capable, though the glasses aren’t included.

BenQ claims 2,200 ANSI lumens. I measured approximately 1,591. It’s normal for projectors to measure lower than their claimed specs. This is a bright image, similar to the Epson HC2150 and only slightly less than the newer Epson HC2250.

Lens shift in this price range is rare, and rarer still with DLP projectors, so its inclusion here would be one of the HT2050A’s main selling points even if it didn’t look as good as it does. That said, the lens shift isn’t a lot. BenQ says it adjusts the vertical range by 10%. So depending where you place the projector, you’ll have a few inches of vertical leeway, but that’s it. Still, it definitely helps and is better than the nothing you get with most single-chip DLP projectors.

Watch this: Six things to know about home theater projectors

The zoom range is only average however, falling behind the Epson. So you won’t be able to place it quite as close, or as far, from the screen. In that way it’s similar to many other DLP projectors in this price range.

Also average is the lamp life, at 3,500 hours in Normal mode. This goes up to 7,000 hours in the SmartEco mode, which maintains the maximum brightness of the Normal mode but drops lamp power during dark scenes for a better black level. Though you can occasionally see this happen, it’s fast enough that it’s fine to leave in this mode (unless you notice and hate it).

benq-ht2050a-18-of-12

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Connectivity and convenience

  • HDMI
    inputs: 2
  • PC input: Analog RGB
  • USB port: 1 (1.5A power)
  • Audio input and output: Yes
  • Digital audio output: No
  • LAN port: No
  • 12-volt trigger: Yes
  • RS-232 remote port: Yes
  • MHL: Yes
  • Remote: Backlit

Both HDMI inputs have HDCP 1.4, meaning you can send each input any video source you want. This isn’t the case with some competitors, which only have HDCP 1.4 on one of the HDMI inputs. The USB connection has a claimed 1.5 amp output, letting you power a streaming stick directly with no external power adapters. 

The HT2050A has several legacy analog video inputs, which is a rarity these days. Not only do you get component video, but composite as well. So if you want to directly connect something like a Nintendo Wii, or, I don’t know, a LaserDisc player or something, you can do it with no extra adapters. These connections share RCA analog audio inputs.

There are also 3.5mm audio input and outputs, the latter to connect to an external speaker or
soundbar
.

The RS-232 and 12-volt trigger are useful for those with more elaborate home theater systems.

The remote is backlit with a relatively dim orange backlight. This is a good thing: Many of the current crop of projector remotes have a bright blue backlight. Using them can be like forming your own personal B-type star while you’re just trying to change the inputs in the dark.

benq-ht2050a-20-of-12

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Picture quality comparisons

I compared the HT2050A to the Epson HC2150 and the Viewsonic PX727HD. The latter, like the BenQ, is DLP. The Epson, like the majority of Epson’s projectors, is LCD. I connected these via a Monoprice 1×4 distribution amplifier and viewed them all on a 102-inch 1.0-gain screen.

Right away the differences were apparent. Firstly, the Viewsonic was far dimmer, and didn’t have the contrast ratio of the other two. This put it at a distant third, so I spent most of my time comparing the Epson and the BenQ.

Both projectors are far brighter than even high-end projectors from a few years ago. What’s more obvious than the numbers would suggest is how much better the black level, and therefore the contrast ratio, is on the BenQ. This is clear when viewing widescreen movies, with the black bars several shades darker on the BenQ. Because their light output is roughly the same, this gives the HT2050A a bit more dimensionality to the image and more apparent depth. 

A good example of this is the contrasty scene in Avengers: Infinity War where Thor and his pet rabbit help Tyrion Lannister forge the Stormbreaker battle axe. Nidavellir’s colorful neutron star and magical effects are brightly offset compared to the darkness of space and the shadows of the forge. These shots don’t look bad on the Epson, but the shadows are far more gray than on the BenQ, giving the latter a more pleasing look overall.

benq-ht2050a-17-of-12

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Color is another point in the BenQ’s favor. It’s just a little richer and more realistic. Greens especially look more natural. The grass in the Battle of Wakanda, also in Infinity War, for example, is just a more vibrant and realistic shade of green. The blue of the shield wall is a stronger, more vivid blue, without the sky looking like candy.

Another place where the BenQ wins out over the Epson is with motion resolution. All LCD-based displays have some degree of motion blur. DLP-based projectors don’t, thanks to the way they create an image. This is most obvious in the way the BenQ maintains detail when things move. Take the camera-panning action of Live Die Repeat: Edge of Tomorrow. When there are closeups of Emily Blunt or Tom Cruise’s faces, you can still see fine details throughout.

benq-ht2050a-13-of-12

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

On the other hand there’s DLP’s long-standing problem: rainbows. These are multicolored trails left by bright objects on screen. You may also notice them if you move your eyes quickly. Most people either don’t see them, or aren’t bothered by them, so they may not be an issue for you. But people who are bothered by them are really bothered by them. In that case, no single-chip DLP projector is likely to work. You’ll have to go with an LCD option like the Epson HC2150, or a higher priced LCOS projector (
Sony
or JVC) or a much more expensive three-chip DLP projector.

With its high light output, great-for-its-price contrast ratio and accurate color, the HT2050A is a great choice for someone looking to replace their TV, or who wants a projector for the occasional movie night. The icing on the cake is the lens shift, which should allow the 2050 to fit in a lot more homes than most projectors in this price range.

Geek Box

Test Result Score
Black luminance (0%) 0.089 Average
Peak white luminance (100%) 176.7 Good
Derived lumens 1591 Good
Avg. grayscale error (10-100%) 6.608 Average
Dark gray error (20%) 3.43 Average
Bright gray error (70%) 8.499 Poor
Avg. color error 2.759 Good
Red error 5.578 Average
Green error 1.391 Good
Blue error 3.254 Average
Cyan error 3.187 Average
Magenta error 1.871 Good
Yellow error 1.274 Good
Avg. saturations error 2.07 Good
Avg. color checker error 2 Good
Avg. luminance error 3.5 Average
Input lag (Game mode) 16.4 Good

Measurement notes and suggested picture settings

Before calibration the 2050A’s most accurate picture setting was Cinema, which was OK. Its grayscale wasn’t too close to D65, especially with brighter images. This was highly adjustable, however, and was easily dialed in to be accurate. Colors were fairly accurate out of the box: They were all close to their targets except for magenta, which was a little off, but not badly. Colors, just like color temperature, were adjustable. And after calibration, they were far closer.

There’s no iris on the 2050A, but it does have a variable lamp. Eco mode is about 33% dimmer than Normal mode. The contrast ratio in the Normal and Eco modes averaged 2,094:1, which is pretty good for a projector in this price range. The DynamicEco mode, which bases the lamp power on the average picture level of the image, creates a dynamic contrast ratio about 50% higher than the other lamp settings, but the contrast ratio within a single image is still 2,094:1.

Best Picture Mode: Cinema

Expert settings (suggested):

  • Brightness: 51
  • Contrast: 41
  • Sharpness
    : 7
  • Color: N/A
  • Tint (G/R): N/A
  • Color Temp: Normal
  • Gamma Selection: 2.2
  • Brilliant Color: On
  • Noise Reduction: 7
  • Fast Mode: Off

Top picks tested, reviewed and ranked

Top picks tested, reviewed and ranked

While there’s no denying that the latest iPhones are great handsets in their own right, long gone are the days of the Android crowd feeling envious of Apple’s output. Our current picks for the best Android phones have stood out from the competition, wowing our team of tech experts.

The best thing about Android has always been (and continues to be) the amount of choice you have on offer. With great options from the likes of Samsung, Google, OnePlus and more, you can decide which phone to buy based on the features that you value the most – something that can’t really be said when shopping for an iPhone.

For example, if you enjoy streaming or gaming on your smartphone, you can opt for a handset with a fast, modern chipset and a gorgeous OLED display. For those who love taking pictures with their smartphone and want the widest array of sensors possible, you’re also covered.

It’s this freedom of choice that makes Android such a great option for consumers everywhere, but it does mean that if you’re not careful, you can get bogged down in the details. Thankfully, that’s where we come in.

With all of the phones you see on this list, they were used as the main handset by the reviewer in question, and then subjected to our series of tests to ensure that the phone holds up under scrutiny. This procedure involves documenting battery drain, charging speeds, chipset performance and camera detail, just to name a few.

Once all these tests are completed, we can provide our final verdict on a phone, along with a corresponding score. Only those that really stood out from the pack are able to make it into this very list.

Advertisement

If you are curious to know a bit more about where iPhones stand against the top Android performers, you should have a read of our best phones guide. For the more budget-conscious among you, we also have price-centric buying guides in the form of the best mid-range phones and the best cheap phones.

Best Android phones at a glance

SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST

Learn more about how we test mobile phones

All the phones included in our Best Android phone list have been thoroughly tested and used by one of our expert reviewers. We will never review a phone based purely on specs and benchmark scores. We use them as our everyday device for the review period, which is usually at least five days but often a lot more.

Whenever you read a phone review published on Trusted Reviews, you should be confident that the reviewer has put their personal SIM card into the phone, synced across their most-used apps and logged into all their typical accounts. We do this so you’ll feel confident in our review and trust our verdict.

Our review process includes a mixture of real-world tests, along with more than 15 measured tests and industry-standard benchmarks. We believe this gives the most rounded view of a device.


  • Redesigned chassis looks way more modern

  • Holistic, genuinely helpful approach to AI

  • Amazing photo and video capabilities

  • All-day battery life


  • Second price hike in two years

  • Can get hot when gaming

  • Tensor G4 isn’t much more powerful than the G3

If you’re shopping for an Android phone and want the best AI experience around, the Pixel 9 Pro XL is our current favourite pick.

As with any Pixel phone, the 9 Pro XL is mostly about two things – the Google software and the camera. The cameras remain fairly similar to what we saw on the Pixel 8 Pro, but refreshed tech, including larger zoom and ultrawide sensors and new AI smarts, improves performance on all three of the rear lenses. There are software tweaks, too, including a bunch of updated modes – including Night Sight Video – you’ll actually want to use.

Photos from the phone are great in practically any scenario. They are richer and more immersive than those from the Galaxy S25 series and often better in darker situations, too, despite the much higher megapixel count on offer from the S25 Ultra in particular. The zoom might not match up to Samsung’s Ultra efforts, but if you keep it to around the 5-10x mark, the results are great.

Powering the phone is Google’s Tensor G4 chipset, though like previous entries, it’s not the quickest around – many phones on this list post better benchmark scores – with the focus being instead on AI prowess.

Many software additions here are made better by this chip, including support for on-device Google Gemini smarts, the ability to search for Screenshots using natural language and even generate new images entirely on-device, and everything works very well. Samsung has started to claw back some of that interest with Galaxy AI on its flagship series, but there’s still more to take advantage of with the Pixel 9 Pro XL than the S25.

The 6.8-inch Super Actua screen is on par with high-end options from Apple and Samsung, although battery life is starting to lag behind the competition. The Pixel 9 Pro XL is also more expensive than the Pixel 8 Pro, with the new regular Pixel 9 Pro offering pro-level smarts in a smaller 6.3-inch package.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10187772


  • Redesigned chassis feels good in the hand

  • Oodles of power under the hood

  • Excellent camera performance

  • Gorgeous display with super-slim bezels


  • Much of the camera hardware remains unchanged

  • Battery doesn’t last as long as 2025 rivals

  • New Galaxy AI features are limited

Given that last year’s Galaxy S24 Ultra held this spot until recently, it probably shouldn’t be too much of a surprise to see that its successor, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, has now taken over its post.

While it’s true that the S25 Ultra doesn’t depict a monumental upgrade over last year’s flagship, and that if you do have that phone or even the S23 Ultra then you’re better off staying put for the time being, there’s no getting around how great this display looks on a daily basis.

This time around, the bezels have been shaved down even further to create the illusion at times that one half of the phone is simply all-screen. It certainly means that you now get the most out of its gigantic 6.9-inch AMOLED display when it comes to watching TV shows or indulging in a spot of gaming, the latter of which is a breeze thanks to the included Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chipset.

The S24 Ultra’s anti-reflective coating makes a comeback here as well, and it does a fantastic job at minimising distraction from nearby light sources. This, in turn, should have a knock-on effect on the device’s battery life as you won’t feel as pressured to up the brightness on your phone when using it outdoors.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207165


  • Exceptional camera performance across the board

  • Snapdragon 8 Elite power

  • Pixel-packed 6.7-inch screen

  • All-day battery life and rapid charging


  • Curved display can lead to mispresses

  • Only four OS upgrades promised

There’s no shortage of fantastic camera phones in the Android smartphone market, but the Xiaomi 15 Ultra stands head and shoulders above the competition with some of the best performance across the board.

That’s headed up by a 50MP main camera with a whopping 1-inch sensor that’s larger than anything you’ll find from Samsung, Apple and Google, and allows for phenomenal day-to-day performance. Not only are images crisp and detailed, but the large sensor also allows for stunning performance in low-light scenarios too.

That’s backed up by a 50MP 3x floating telephoto lens that doubles up as a pretty fantastic telemacro lens, complete with a natural bokeh you’d expect from DSLRs, and the 200MP periscope lens captures plenty of detail at the 50x mark and beyond. The 50MP ultrawide is the weakest of the four lenses, but that’s only because the others are exceptional. It’d be considered a fairly capable ultrawide lens if this were any other smartphone.

The Leica tuning is present and accounted for, both in the form of Vibrant and Authentic shooting modes along with a variety of filters and Leica-style bokeh effects when taking portrait photos.

It’s not just a great camera phone either; it sports a curved 6.73-inch WQHD+ AMOLED screen with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate, top-end Snapdragon 8 Elite power and a healthy 5410mAh battery with 90W charging.

The only real chink in its armour is its software; while HyperOS 2 is much cleaner than the older EMUI, the inspiration is still clear, and it’s about as far as you can get from stock Android. It also falls short when it comes to long-term support, with Xiaomi committing to four years of OS upgrades and six years of security patches.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207332


  • Exceptional battery life

  • Impressive performance

  • Top-end screen

  • Versatile camera setup


  • Issues with camera focus and halo effects

  • More bloatware

  • Limited AI smarts compared to some brands

This was a very close competition where, at one point, the Oppo Find X8 Pro was also considered, but in the end it was the outstanding OnePlus 13 that swooped in to take the crown. Simply put, if you want the best battery life possible on an Android handset for some seriously heavy use then this is the one you’ll want to get.

The included 6000mAh cell is an absolute beast, and thanks to its use of more efficient silicon carbon material, it doesn’t add much to the phone’s overall weight either. In our testing, we found it incredibly difficult to fully drain the battery during an intensive day of use. As a testament to this, we were able to play roughly half an hour of Mario Kart Tour and only see up to a 4% drop from the overall charge.

This is the type of longevity that more casual users can probably stretch to a two-day stint, and it’s made even better thanks to 100W fast charging if you pick up a compatible adapter which, unfortunately, is sold separately. However it is worth noting that wireless charging of any kind is not available with this phone.

On top of the stellar battery life, you’ve got the wonderful OxygenOS which makes using OnePlus phones feel wonderfully intuitive, and the cameras aren’t too bad either, but they pale in comparison to what Google and Samsung have achieved.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207250


  • Highest-resolution telephoto lens around

  • Plenty of power under the hood

  • Top-end display experience


  • AI Super Zoom leaves much to be desired

  • Smaller battery than its predecessor

  • Quite similar to Honor Magic 6 Pro

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is in an interesting space this year. Its predecessor, the Honor Magic 6 Pro, previously held the spot on this list as having the best battery, but this phone has a smaller cell and that spot has been taken by the superior OnePlus 13. However, there is one key area where the Honor Magic 7 Pro crushed the competition and that’s in charging.

If you’re the type of person who’s always rushing from one place to the next, with only a short window of opportunity to top up their smartphone, then you’ll be glad to know that the Magic 7 Pro’s 5270mAh battery can be topped up by either 100W wired-charging or 80W wireless charging.

In the case of that wired charge, you can get a full battery in return from just 33 minutes of connectivity, which is phenomenal. Of course, you’ll need to buy a proper 100W charger to enjoy those faster speeds as unfortunately, you won’t find one included in the box.

Don’t think that the Honor Magic 7 Pro slouches elsewhere though – this phone still benefits from some of the best cameras around, including a super high resolution telephoto lens, and all of the shots you do take look incredible on the device’s 6.8-inch, 1.2K AMOLED display.


  • A joy to use and hold

  • Uncompromising flagship screen

  • Plenty of power

  • Solid camera performance


  • Battery struggles to last a single day

  • Relatively slow 25W charging

  • No dedicated zoom lens

  • Gets warm rather easily

If you want an ultra-slim, lightweight flagship with a fantastic 6.7-inch AMOLED screen, you’ll find no better than Samsung’s new Galaxy S25 Edge.

At 5.6mm thick and 163g, it’s incredibly thin and light compared to most of the flagship competition, especially big-screen alternatives like the S25 Ultra, which makes for a fantastic in-hand feel. It’s super light yet durable, boasting a titanium frame and IP68 dust resistance, with no significant design compromise to achieve its ultra-slim dimensions.

However, it is very much a design-first smartphone. For example, there are only two cameras, lacking the telephoto lens present on much of the competition. It can also struggle to keep the top-end Snapdragon 8 Elite cool, especially when gaming.

The most significant compromise is undoubtedly battery life, as the 6.7-inch QHD+ screen is simply too much for the small 3900mAh cell, resulting in a struggle to last all day.

That said, if you’re willing to compromise and possibly carry around a power bank, the experience of using the S25 Edge is unlike anything else on this list.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207621


  • Excellent and brighter external display

  • Solid camera performance

  • Unique finish options

  • Smooth performance


  • Only 3 years of Android OS updates

  • Moto AI still needs work

  • No telephoto lens

Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip line might’ve popularised the modern clamshell foldable, but it’s not the best around. That award goes instead to the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra.

While this year’s release doesn’t reinvent the wheel compared to the 50 Ultra, the refinements are meaningful. A tougher titanium hinge and improved IP48 dust and water resistance make it more durable where it counts.

That core experience remains slick and satisfying, and given that this is the best flip phone we’ve tested, that’s high praise. The standout feature remains the generous 4-inch cover screen, which handles both widget and full Android apps with ease, letting you do more without flipping it open.

When you do open it, you’re treated to a vibrant 7-inch pOLED display wth Pantone Validated for spot-on colour accuracy. It’s a great panel for everyday use, and while the crease hasn’t vanished, it’s shallower and far less distracting than what rivals offer.

Under the hood, you’ll find the Snapdragon 8 Elite, paired with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage as standard. Battery life similarly impresses, lasting all day without a charge, and 68W fast charging tops it up in under an hour.

Yes, Motorola’s combination of three OS upgrades and four years of security patches lags behind Samsung’s seven OS upgrade promise, but overall, it’s the most capable and polished clamshell you can buy right now.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207648


  • Lightest book-style foldable around

  • Ultra thin design makes it really nice to use

  • Larger, wider, wholly more useful screens

  • Same main camera as Galaxy S25 Ultra


  • Relatively small 4400mAh battery

  • Slow 25W wired charging

  • Zoom camera could be better for the price

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 marks a genuine leap forward for Samsung’s book-style foldable, finally delivering the ultra-slim, lightweight design many have been waiting for.

Shedding much of the bulk and weight of its predecessors, the 4.2mm-thick Fold 7 is now among the thinnest foldables around, and at 215g, it’s both lighter than the book-style competition and even the Galaxy S25 Ultra. It makes it a joy to handle, and it’s almost unnoticeable in the pocket as a result.

Samsung has also nailed the usability of both displays this year. The wider 6.5-inch cover screen is genuinely practical for everyday tasks, while the 8-inch internal panel feels more solid with a way less intrusive crease. Both screens are bright, vibrant and ideal for everything from gaming to multitasking.

Camera performance is another highlight, with the main 200MP sensor borrowed from the S25 Ultra delivering sharp, detailed shots that put the Fold 7 on par with regular bar phones. General performance is equally impressive, thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite and up to 16GB of RAM.

Battery life and charging remain the main drawbacks with a 4400mAh cell and 25W charging falling far behind rivals. Still, for most users, the Fold 7 will comfortably last a day, and the overall package is compelling enough to make it the standout book-style foldable of 2025.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207783


  • Incredible performance

  • Excellent speakers

  • Slick professional design

  • Awesome LED lighting effects


  • Very expensive

  • Cameras aren’t the best

  • Charging could be quicker

The Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition may not be the most rounded Android phone on this list, but it excels at its main point of interest: gaming.

There are oodles of gaming-centric features here, from the AirTriggers that allow for gamepad-esque controls to the Armoury Crate software that enables you to fiddle with the performance settings and display frame rate, temperature and GPU workload figures as you play your favourite mobile games.

The real highlight is the Snapdragon 8 Elite found within. When combined with Asus’ top-notch internal optimisations including an impressive cooling system that sustains gameplay for way longer than regular smartphones, you’ve got one of the most powerful Android phones you can buy.

That’s all well and good, but plenty of gaming phones offer similar performance-focused features. Where the ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition stands out is in the design department by, well, not looking like a gaming phone at all.

Instead, the phone looks not too dissimilar from your regular flagship smartphone with a glass and matte frosted finish on the rear, slimmed down bezels and even a 3x telephoto camera to bolster the rear camera setup. There are still a few gamer-centric design features, like the AniMe panel that can display text, graphics and more, but that disappears from view when not in active use.

The only major stumbling block for this phone is that it’s incredibly expensive, requiring a sum beyond the £1000/$1000 mark. As a result, it may be worth sacrificing a couple of features and opting for the older Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (with a fairly similar spec) instead.


  • Best battery life of any Pixel

  • Clean, more understated look

  • Great camera performance

  • Premium AI features


  • Thick screen bezels look dated

  • No dedicated zoom lens

  • Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips

  • Slow charging

The Pixel 9a is a compact Android phone with an excellent camera, Google’s fantastic software and a price tag that won’t break the bank.

The Pixel 9a breaks tradition and sports a different look to the flagship Pixel 9, ditching the iconic camera bar for a near-flush dual camera housing. Combined with its flat edges and flat screen, it’s a joy to hold and use, though it does have that plasticy feel on the rear.

The Pixel 9a also has an impressive camera setup. Its new 48MP primary camera, like those that came before it, is capable of capturing excellent images in various lighting conditions and accurately captures skin tones. Google really does continue to dominate the mid-range camera space.

Then there are all the AI smarts; in addition to all the AI features on previous ‘a’ series devices, including Best Take, Magic Editor and Magic Eraser, you’ll benefit from the Add Me tech introduced on the Pixel 9 last year. There are other AI-infused elements throughout the OS too, allowing the phone to transcribe recordings and even take calls for you in certain regions.

Plus, with a whopping seven years of OS upgrades guaranteed, it’ll continue to get even more features and functionality over time. That’s a massive boost compared to the three or four upgrades you’ll get from competitors, if you’re lucky.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207452

Advertisement

FAQs

Should I buy a 5G phone?

While not vital, all phones featured in our chart offer 5G, so they are futureproofed.

What’s the best Android phone?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is the best Android phone available right now.

Which Android phone has the best camera?

The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is currently our top pick, though the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and iPhone 16 Pro Max are close runners-up.

Test Data

  Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Xiaomi 15 Ultra OnePlus 13 Honor Magic 7 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition Google Pixel 9a
Geekbench 6 single core 1865 2886 2891 3123 2981 2524 2828 2318 3055 1652
Geekbench 6 multi core 4144 9515 8764 9493 8318 9220 8552 8828 9658 3801
Max brightness 3000 nits
1 hour video playback (Netflix, HDR) 6 % 5 % 7 % 6 % 8 % 6 % 1 %
30 minute gaming (light) 11 % 7 % 6 % 6 % 16 % 5 % 7 % 10 % 6 %
Time from 0-100% charge 80 min 62 min 91 min 89 min 76 min 80 min 87 min 46 min 108 min
Time from 0-50% charge 24 Min 20 Min 29 Min 36 Min 25 Min 39 Min 31 Min 18 Min 40 Min
30-min recharge (included charger) 76 %
15-min recharge (included charger) 39 %
30-min recharge (no charger included) 62 % 70 % 52 % 43 % 61 % 40 % 49 % 40 %
15-min recharge (no charger included) 29 % 35 % 30 % 24 % 33 % 23 % 24 % 22 %
3D Mark – Wild Life 2511 6680 6647 6574 6294 5574 5948 2597
GFXBench – Aztec Ruins 44 fps 78 fps 60 fps 106 fps 76 fps 105 fps 70 fps 138 fps 66 fps
GFXBench – Car Chase 53 fps 77 fps 60 fps 118 fps 82 fps 95 fps 71 fps 160 fps 79 fps

Full Specs

  Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Review Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Review Xiaomi 15 Ultra Review OnePlus 13 Review Honor Magic 7 Pro Review Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Review Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Review Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Review Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition Review Google Pixel 9a Review
UK RRP £1099 £1249 £1299 £899 £1099 £1099 £1099.99 £1799 £1299 £499
USA RRP $1099 $1299 Unavailable $1099 $1999 $1499 $499
EU RRP €1299
Manufacturer Google Samsung Xiaomi OnePlus Honor Samsung Motorola Samsung Asus Google
Screen Size 6.8 inches 6.9 inches 6.7 inches 6.8 mm 6.8 inches 6.7 inches 7 inches 8 inches 6.78 inches 6.3 inches
Storage Capacity 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB 512GB 256GB, 512GB 512GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 1TB 128GB, 256GB
Rear Camera 50MP + 48MP + 48MP 200MP + 50MP + 50MP + 10MP 50MP + 50MP + 200MP + 50MP 50MP + 50MP + 50MP 50MP + 50MP + 200MP 200MP + 12MP 50MP + 50MP 200MP + 12MP + 10MP 50MP + 32MP + 13MP 48MP + 13MP
Front Camera 42MP 12MP 32MP 32MP 50MP 12MP 50MP 10MP + 10MP 32MP 13MP
Video Recording Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
IP rating IP68 IP68 IP68 IP69 IP69 IP68 Not Disclosed Not Disclosed IP68 IP68
Battery 5060 mAh 5000 mAh 5410 mAh 5998 mAh 5270 mAh 3900 mAh 4700 mAh 4400 mAh 5800 mAh 5100 mAh
Wireless charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Size (Dimensions) 76.6 x 8.5 x 162.8 MM 77.6 x 8.2 x 162.8 MM 75.3 x 9.4 x 161.3 MM 76.5 x 8.5 x 162.9 MM 77.1 x 8.8 x 162.7 MM 75.6 x 5.8 x 158.2 MM 74 x 7.1 x 171 MM 143.2 x 4.2 x 158.4 MM 76.8 x 8.9 x 163.8 MM 73.3 x 8.9 x 154.7 MM
Weight 221 G 218 G 226 G 210 G 223 G 163 G 199 G 215 G 227 G 186 G
ASIN B0DPR5MYZ9 B0DQ5JLVJP B0F68G1YR8 B0DSWFHTL2
Operating System Android 14 OneUI 7 (Android 15) HyperOS 2 (Android 15) OxygenOS 15 MagicOS 9 (Android 15) OneUI 7 (Android 15) Android 15 OneUI 8 (Android 16) Android 15 Android 15
Release Date 2024 2025 2025 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 2024 2025
First Reviewed Date 21/08/2024 30/01/2025 02/03/2025 07/01/2025 17/01/2025 23/05/2025 20/05/2025 17/07/2025 19/11/2024 10/04/2025
Resolution 1344 x 2992 1440 x 3120 3200 x 1440 1440 x 3168 1280 x 2800 1440 x 3120 2992 x 1224 2184 x 1968 2400 x 1080 1080 x 2424
HDR Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 165 Hz 120 Hz 185 Hz 120 Hz
Ports USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C x2, 3.5mm headphone port USB-C
Chipset Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Google Tensor G4
RAM 16GB 12GB, 16GB 16GB 12GB, 16GB 12GB 12GB 16GB 12GB, 16GB 8GB
Colours Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray Black, White, Silver Chrome Black, Blue, White Lunar Shadow Grey, Breeze Blue, Black Titanium Silver, Titanium Jetblack and Titanium Icyblue Pantone Rio Red, Pantone Cabaret, Pantone Mountain Trail, Pantone Scarab Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jet-black, Mint Black Obsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony
Stated Power 90 W 98 W 25 W 68 W 25 W 65 W 23 W
Wolfbox G900 Pro dash cam review: problematic for me, but could still be perfect for you

Wolfbox G900 Pro dash cam review: problematic for me, but could still be perfect for you

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Wolfbox G900 Pro: One-minute review

The Wolfbox G900 Pro is a mirror-style dash cam that records 4K forwards and 2.5K video rearwards. The weatherproof rear camera can be screwed to your vehicle’s bumper, turning into a reversing camera. A live video feed from either camera, or both, can be seen on the touchscreen display, which is integrated in the mirror itself.

Both cameras produce excellent, high-quality video, and the user interface is a joy to use – it’s sharp, responsive and intuitive. The Wolfbox app also works well, with videos transferred quickly via 5 GHz Wi-Fi from the dash cam to your phone, although transferring footage directly from the included microSD card isn’t an option for macOS users, due to how the card is formatted by the dash cam.

Installation is more involved than with other dash cams, and the separate GPS antenna creates extra clutter that you’ll likely want to hide. The design of the G900 isn’t perfect, as I found that its camera was partially blocked by the mirror assembly of some vehicles. This is a dash cam to try (or at least measure carefully) before you buy.

Wolfbox G900 Pro dash cam

(Image credit: Future / Alistair Charlton)

Wolfbox G900 Pro: Price & availability

Anker Nebula Mars II Pro Review: Petite Portable Projector Performs Proficiently

Anker Nebula Mars II Pro Review: Petite Portable Projector Performs Proficiently

anker-mars-ii-pro-19-of-11

The Nebula Mars II Pro by Anker is a cute, tiny portable projector.

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Anker’s Nebula Mars II Pro is a surprising little portable mini projector. And I do mean little. It’s small enough to hide completely under a six-pack of Coke. With built-in streaming and a battery good for around three and a half hours of projection, the Mars II Pro is a great companion for a movie night in the backyard or somewhere farther afield. And in addition to being a projector, it’s also a big Bluetooth speaker.

Like


  • Compact size


  • Built-in battery lasts up to 3.5 hours


  • Surprisingly loud speakers

Don’t like


  • Worse brightness and contrast than home projectors


  • Inaccurate color


  • Limited app store


  • Requires charging brick

Video quality will be good enough for many viewers, but compared with a similarly priced home projector it’s far dimmer, with worse contrast ratio and color accuracy. Compared with other tiny, battery-powered projectors however, the image is very watchable and speakers sound surprisingly powerful. 

The main reason to get the Mars II Pro is if you want ultra-portable video, especially outdoors. It’s easy to put near a wall or screen and stream some Netflix within minutes, anywhere. If you plan to use it regularly in the same room inside, however, you’re probably better off with a more traditional projector.

Editor’s note, Dec. 1: Due to its performance, size and price, we’re giving the Nebula Mars II Pro our Editors’ Choice award as our favorite portable projector. While there are newer portable mini projectors that are brighter and easier to use, the ones that outperform this Anker — like the Xgimi Halo Plus — are also more expensive. The Mars II Pro is a great all-around projector for the price.

Basic specs

  • Native resolution: 1,280×720 pixels
  • HDR-compatible: No
  • 4K-compatible: No
  • 3D-compatible: No
  • Lumens spec: 500
  • Zoom: None
  • Lens shift: None
  • Lamp life (Normal mode): 30,000 hours

The Mars II Pro is smaller than you might think. It would fit easily inside any backpack with plenty of room to spare for a water bottle, hoodie or camera. Anker could have made the carrying strap out of cheap-feeling plastic, but has a faux-leather top and is soft underneath. It’s nice to touch.

There are buttons on the top for all the basic functions, but no controls for zoom or focus. This is logical since there’s no zoom and focus is automatic. An integrated slide-open lens cap also turns the projector on and off.

To get a 100-inch image, the Mars II Pro needs to be about nine feet from the screen. Resolution is 720p, which is pretty low for a projector these days and lower than the competing ViewSonic M2, which is 1080p. The LED lamp is rated at 30,000 hours. 

Max brightness is a claimed 500 lumens. I measured about 37 nits, which calculates out to about 337 lumens. For comparison, the ViewSonic M2 produces 349 lumens by my measurements, while the slightly more expensive, but far less portable, Optoma HD146X puts out around 1,146. 

Anker claims the internal 12,500-mAh battery is good for about three and a half hours viewing time, and about that long to charge back up again. If you keep it in the high brightness mode, that drops to one and a half hours. If you’re just using the Mars II as a Bluetooth speaker, Anker claims about 30 hours for audio-only playback.

Though not specifically mentioned as a feature by Anker, some apps treat the Mars II Pro as a mobile device, so you can actually download shows to its 8GB internal storage. 

anker-mars-ii-pro-15-of-11

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Connectivity and convenience

  • HDMI inputs: 1
  • USB port: 1 
  • Audio input and output: 3.5mm output
  • Digital audio output: None
  • Wi-Fi: 802.11a/b/g/n
  • Remote: Not backlit

There is one HDMI input, which is plenty on a projector like this. The USB port lets you stream content from a USB memory stick, or you can charge a device (like your phone), using the Mars II Pro’s beefy battery. 

That’s it for physical connections, other than the power port, which requires a separate power brick. That’s a bummer: I’m a hardliner “everything portable should charge via USB.” If you want to charge the projector away from home, you’ll have to pack the brick too.

The Mars II Pro’s runs Android 7.1, which puts all the streaming capability inside the PJ. So all you need is to tether the projector to your phone or connect to some available Wi-Fi. 

You don’t get the full Google Play Store, however, or even Android TV. Instead, it’s Aptoide, a sort of culled or curated version of the Play Store. It’s a bit of a liability with the ViewSonic M2, and it’s no better here. There’s Netflix, YouTube, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, Disney Plus and others you may or may not recognize. There’s HBO Nordic and HBO Go, but no US HBO or HBO Max. Chromecast is not supported. Overall it’s not bad, but you might not be able to find every service you’re used to.

The remote is wafer thin, but not backlit. That’s fine because you’re probably not going to use it. Instead, there’s the Anker Connect app (Android and iOS), which connects easily and does all the same things. In fact, some of the apps actually require the app. Control in the projector’s menus works fine, but it’s a bit clunky in the Netflix app for instance. Not a big issue, but it could be smoother.

There are two side-firing 10-watt speakers and a rectangular passive radiator in the front. That doesn’t sound like much, but it’s fairly loud and the sound quality is better than I expected from such a small device. This is one of the few projectors I’ve actually turned down to achieve a normal listening level.

anker-mars-ii-pro-20-of-11

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Picture quality comparisons

I compared the Mars II Pro to the ViewSonic M2, another portable projector, and the Optoma HD146X, a traditional plug-in PJ. The M2 is very similar to the Anker, can run off a battery and also runs apps from the Aptoide store. The Optoma is a very different projector, and only a direct competitor in one sense: price. 

I have a feeling the Mars II Pro might attract the attention of someone not typically interested in projectors, so the Optoma is here as an example of what similar money can get you in a non-portable, standard projector. I connected these via a Monoprice 1×4 distribution amplifier and viewed all on a 102-inch 1.0-gain screen.

anker-mars-ii-pro-13-of-11

Top view with carrying strap

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

First up is brightness. The M2 and Mars II are remarkably similar. Their light outputs and contrast ratios are basically identical. In both cases, this amount is “fine.” Considering the size and their ability to run off batteries, somewhere around 300 lumens is acceptable. When creating a 100-inch image that equates to about 37 nits. That’s enough for a watchable, albeit dim, image. You’re better off moving the Anker closer, which will create a smaller but brighter image.

The Optoma, on the other hand, is significantly brighter than either one. On a same size screen I measured over 127 nits, which is over five times brighter than the Mars II. The Optoma is much more watchable at 100 inches. And if you use the Optoma’s most color accurate mode, it’s still twice as bright as the other two. 

And we definitely need to talk about color. The Mars II Pro has some of the least accurate colors of any projector I’ve ever reviewed. Blue is the only color out of the three primary and three secondary colors that is accurate. Green is oversaturated. Yellow isn’t but is quite greenish-yellow. Magenta is oversaturated and too blue. The result looks like you’ve got the color control a few ticks above where it should be. It’s not weird, per se, and overall it still looks better than the M2, but overall it’s definitely more Speed Racer than The Grand Budapest Hotel. 

Side by side with the Optoma, it’s night and day. Or at least Technicolor and Kodachrome. The Optoma isn’t super accurate itself, and actually errs on the side of being undersaturated, but its colors look far more natural than the Anker.

Unlike the Optoma, the Mars II doesn’t have extensive picture settings. It has two. You can adjust the color temperature: Normal, Cool and Warm, and even the most accurate (Warm) is still way too cool. You can adjust the lamp settings: Standard, Battery and Auto. Standard is its brightest. Battery is dim but gets you that three-plus hour view time. Auto switches between the two other modes depending on whether or not the projector is plugged in. That’s it. No brightness, contrast, tint. One result is that you can’t adjust contrast to restore clipped details in bright whites.

anker-mars-ii-pro-12-of-11

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

Contrast ratio, like the brightness, is acceptable given the category. I measured an average of 354:1 across all modes. That seems low, and it is, but the majority of sub-$1,000 projectors are only two or three times that. The high end of that performance range, the BenQ HT2050A is 2,094:1. The ViewSonic is basically the same as the Anker, at 376:1. The Optoma is 568:1. 

The Anker’s image lacks punch but not as much as you might think. In fact, because the Anker’s black level is a little lower than the M2 it looks a little better. The M2 is very slightly brighter, which isn’t noticeable. That black level is even lower than the Optoma, but that projector is so much brighter this edge isn’t relevant. 

Lastly we come to detail. Both the M2 and HD146X are 1080p to the Anker’s 720p. On a 100-inch screen this is most noticeable if you’re close enough to notice the individual pixels, which are fairly large. If you shrink the image down to 60-80 inches, it looks detailed enough that it doesn’t look soft. 

Conclusion

Honestly, I wasn’t expecting much from the Mars II Pro. I’ve been underwhelmed with most battery-powered portable projectors I’ve reviewed. I’ve also found that companies not known for video gear tend to miss some important things when it comes to projectors. For instance, picture quality. 

Overall I’m impressed that Anker got a lot right with the Mars II Pro. At least when graded on the curve of price, size and battery power. Compared with an average home projector it comes up short in every performance metric, so If you’re looking for something that will never stray too far from an outlet, you’re better off with a more “traditional” projector. But if you want something portable to watch movies outside, the Mars II Pro has a great design, sounds good, is easy to use and has a more watchable image than the ViewSonic M2 — all for less money.


As well as covering TV and other display tech, Geoff does photo tours of cool museums and locations around the world, including nuclear submarinesmassive aircraft carriersmedieval castlesairplane graveyards and more. 

You can follow his exploits on Instagram and YouTube, and on his travel blog, BaldNomad. He also wrote a bestselling sci-fi novel about city-sized submarines, along with a sequel.

Testing the top mid-priced options

Testing the top mid-priced options

It wasn’t that long ago that if you wanted high-end features on your phone then you would have to part with sizeable sums to match, but that’s no longer the case. The best mid-range phones continue to raise the bar with innovation at wallet-friendly prices.

While there’s always going to be an audience for the type of high-end handsets that appear in our best smartphones list, the sector that really shows off just how far smartphones have come is at the mid-range level. We are surprised each year with just how much value companies are able to bring to consumers who don’t want to spend more than £699/$699 on their next upgrade.

Nowadays, it’s perfectly acceptable to anticipate a certain standard over overall usability with mid-range phones, such as a reasonably fast chipset and eye-catching display. Beyond that, you have the ability to pick and choose with features you prefer the most. If you’re going to take a lot of pictures then there are definite standouts in that category, just as there are instant winners when it comes to offering massive amounts of battery life. We know as much because we put all of these phones through our rigorous testing process.

Every aspect of a phone is brought under scrutiny when used by one of our tech experts. No stone is left unturned as everything from screen brightness to battery drain when streaming is tested and documented. This ensures that all of our reviews stand as a comprehensive guide to the phone in question, so you won’t be left with any burning questions before deciding which device to buy.

Of course, if you do want to opt for something further down the pricing scale then you may be better suited by our list of the best cheap phones. Alternatively, if you’re looking to narrow your upgrade to a specific brand then we also have the current rankings of the best Samsung phones and the best Google Pixel phones.

For more smartphone related guides, check out our breakdowns of the best camera phone, best gaming phone, best Android phone, best iPhone, best Samsung phone and recommended SIM deals.

Advertisement

Best mid-range smartphones at a glance

SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST

How we test

Learn more about how we test mobile phones

All the devices in this list have been thoroughly tested and used by one of our expert reviewers. We don’t review a phone purely on specs or benchmark scores and we use them as our everyday device for the review period, which is usually at least five days but often a lot more.

When we review a phone our expert will put their personal SIM card into the phone, sync across their most-used apps and log into all their typical accounts. We do this so you’ll feel confident in our review and trust our verdict.

Our review process includes a mixture of real-world tests, along with more than 15 measured tests and industry-standard benchmarks


  • Outlandish performance

  • Exceptionally fast charging

  • Excellent 144Hz display


  • New ‘Deco’ aesthetic

  • No charger included

  • Ads baked into the OS

If you’re looking for a smartphone that brings you as close to the flagship experience as possible without dropping flagship smartphone levels of cash, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is your best option.

The 6.67-inch CrystalRes AMOLED screen is a treat for the eyes with its pixel-packed 1.5K resolution and 144Hz refresh rate, offering superb visuals with inky blacks and vibrant colours helped by support for 12-bit colour depth that makes it fantastic for both binging movies and gaming.

The latter is certainly possible with the 14T Pro, sporting MediaTek’s top-end 2024 chipset, the Dimensity 9300+, with benchmark results competing, if not beating, much of the flagship competition. That’s paired with 16GB of RAM and up to 1TB of storage.

Camera performance is also a treat, sporting a 50MP main, 50MP ultrawide and a 12MP 2.6x telephoto, sharing the main camera with the flagship Xiaomi 14. Its Leica-powered shots look detailed and vibrant, with solid low-light performance to boot.

Throw in a 5000mAh battery that’ll last all day and support for super-fast 120W fast charging that delivers a full charge in 23 minutes and you’ve got a solid all-rounder that’s easy to recommend to most.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10179495


  • Excellent for gaming

  • Brilliant battery life

  • Improved design


  • Ultrawide camera is weak

  • No wireless charging

  • Alert slider could do more

The OnePlus 13R is a solid attempt at a mid-range smartphone that manages to stand out in a busy market with a smattering of genuinely high-end tech.

The display is one of the main reasons to opt for the phone. While the 6.78-inch AMOLED screen isn’t quite as pixel-packed as the flagship OnePlus 13, it boasts the same 120Hz refresh rate and, rather importantly, LTPO 4.1 tech.

Along with the OnePlus 13, it’s one of the first phones on the market to sport the tech, which allows the phone to adjust the refresh rate as you scroll. This means that the screen feels super responsive in use and, crucially, it’s way more battery-friendly.

That also means that, combined with a sizeable 6000mAh silicon carbon battery that’s larger than any other phone in our chart, the OnePlus 13R has superb battery life, easily able to last a day if not two depending on what you’re up to. Even then, with 80W SuperVOOC charging it’ll get a full charge in 52 minutes.

It’s also a decent performer with the 2024 flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, especially when coupled with OnePlus’ various software and hardware optimisations and upgraded cooling mechanisms. It’ll leave practically any other mid-ranger in the dust, both in benchmarks and real-world use.

Elsewhere, it has a solid 50MP primary and 2x telephoto cameras, though the 8MP ultrawide isn’t quite as exciting. It also won’t get as many updates as the Pixel 8a, capping out at four OS upgrades and six years of security patches.


  • Best battery life of any Pixel

  • Clean, more understated look

  • Great camera performance

  • Premium AI features


  • Thick screen bezels look dated

  • No dedicated zoom lens

  • Tensor G4 not as powerful as other flagship chips

  • Slow charging

Google’s mid-range ‘a’ series has long dominated when it comes to camera performance, and this year’s Pixel 9a is here to pick up that mantle. 

Sporting a refreshed 48MP camera with a larger sensor than that of the 8a, the main lens does an admirable job in practically any lighting condition. Images are always packed with light and detail, with way more accurate colours than other mid-rangers, especially when it comes to skin tones. 

That said, Google is losing ground to the Nothing Phone 3a Pro and its dedicated periscope lens, with the 9a still relying on Google’s AI-powered Super Res Zoom, but it does a decent enough job when you want to close the gap.

There’s also a 13MP ultrawide lens that, while not as performant as the main lens, is great at capturing scenic vistas during the day. 

It’s not just a great camera phone of course; the Pixel 9a sports its own unique look for the first time, ditching the iconic camera bar for a near-flush camera housing, and it’s powered by the same Tensor G4 chipset as the flagship too. 

Throw in an AI-infused stock Android 15 experience with seven years of OS upgrades, all-day battery life and a solid 6.3-inch screen, and it becomes hard to resist. 

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207452


  • Decent telephoto for the money

  • Fresh Essential Key implementation

  • Design still something special


  • New camera module somewhat ugly

  • Performance not outstanding for the money

  • Sluggish camera app

The Nothing Phone 3a Pro is the latest mid-ranger from startup Nothing, and it comes with quite the surprising feature considering its £449 price point: a 3x periscope camera. All other zoom lenses at a similar price point are fixed telephoto snappers locked at 2x, whereas the 3a Pro’s OIS-enabled snapper can deliver rich and sharp images at the 10x mark and beyond.

The primary 50MP camera also delivers performance above what you’d expect for the price, utilising Google’s Ultra XDR magic to boost the dynamic range of shots to deliver stunningly rich and vibrant results. However, it’s let down by a weak 8MP ultrawide that can’t quite match the performance of the other lenses.

It’s not just a great camera phone, either; it’s also one of the more unique-looking phones on the market. Its transparent glass rear shows stylised cables and other internal components, along with Nothing’s signature Glyph LED tech. That look also translates to the software in the form of the heavily stylised Nothing OS 3.1.

What it isn’t, however, is a powerhouse. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 is fine for day-to-day tasks and closely mirrors the performance of the year-old Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, but it’s left behind by the Pixel 8a and Poco X7 Pro.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207410


  • Speedy performance from the Snapdragon 8 Elite

  • Big, vibrant 120Hz display with fast response times

  • Proper zoom lens adds versatility to the camera system

  • Battery refills in about half an hour


  • Regular Wi-Fi connection issues

  • Ultrawide camera is poor

  • HyperOS remains a cumbersome Android skin

  • 120W charging doesn’t quite charge as fast as expected

If you’re after the best performance possible without spending flagship prices, look no further than the Poco F7 Ultra

The Poco F-series has always led the way in performance in the mid-range space, but this year’s Ultra model takes things a step further with the inclusion of the Snapdragon 8 Elite. That’s the most powerful chipset on the market at the moment, and the chipset of choice for practically every flagship Android phone on the market.

As such, the Poco F7 Ultra can handle practically anything you can throw at it, delivering faster speeds and better gaming performance than any other phone mentioned in our chart in both benchmark tests and real-world use. If you’re a keen mobile gamer wanting to get the most out of your smartphone, this should be of serious consideration.

It’s not just a powerhouse either; it sports a 6.7-inch 120Hz AMOLED screen with a pixel-packed WQHD+ resolution – the same as the top-end Galaxy S25 Ultra – and a 5300mAh battery that’ll keep you going all day without much complaint. 

If you want a super-fast phone for as little money as possible, the Poco F7 Ultra is the phone to go for. 


  • Sleek, grown-up looks

  • Wonderfully efficient

  • Gorgeous OLED screen


  • AI camera features can leave images feeling quite synthetic

  • MagicOS 9 may be a divisive distro of Android

The Honor 400 Pro may be one of the pricier phones on our list at £699, but if you want a top-notch viewing experience and flagship-level AI smarts, it may well be worth it.

The Honor 400 Pro sports a 6.7-inch curved AMOLED screen that’s every part flagship, with a 120Hz refresh rate, 5000nits peak brightness and advanced eye comfort tech. It makes for a great viewing experience, whether gaming or bingeing a movie.

The main draw of the Honor 400 Pro is its impressive AI capabilities, offering pretty much every AI feature present on the company’s top-end Magic 7 Pro.

That includes both Honor-developed AI features like Magic Portal alongside new Google AI features like Photo to Video, the first smartphone to offer the tech. It’s easily the most versatile phone in this list when it comes to AI.

Elsewhere, the Honor 400 Pro boasts an impressive camera experience headed by a 200MP main camera and flanked by 50MP telephoto and 12MP ultrawide snappers. The hardware is impressive, and Honor uses AI trickery like AI Super Zoom to further boost performance – though results are hit-and-miss.

It’s also a powerhouse with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 that was the flagship chip of choice just a year ago, and with a 5300mAh silicon-carbon battery, it has no issue lasting a day or two on a single charge.

There’s very little to dislike, though again, it’s one of the more premium mid-range options available.


  • A welcome update to the entry-level iPhone

  • All the Apple Intelligence features

  • Nice design for the price

  • Great battery life


  • A large selection of missing features, like MagSafe

  • Single rear camera is a bit limiting in 2025

  • The iPhone 16 isn’t that much more expensive

Until recently, the iPhone 15 sat as our go-to Apple recommendation within this list, sitting right at the ceiling of our cut-off point with a price tag of £699/$699. However, with the iPhone 16e now on the market, Apple finally has a handset that fits more in line with the pricing of most mid-range phones.

While the iPhone 16e doesn’t topple the likes of the Pixel 8a on smartphone photography, or the OnePlus 13R where the display is concerned, its value proposition lies in giving you a high-end iOS experience at a price that’s much cheaper (£200/$200 to be exact) than the iPhone 16.

Despite being the cheapest option in the iPhone 16 range, the 16e still boasts the same A18 Bionic chipset as the standard 16 and the iPhone 16 Plus, so you’re not missing out in terms of day to day performance. Apps load quickly, Apple Arcade titles run beautifully and more. Plus, you’ve got access to Apple Intelligence.

While Apple’s take on AI isn’t worth the upgrade alone at the time of writing, we no doubt anticipate that it’ll be at the heart of Apple’s software strategy in the near future, and the iPhone 16e should get access to those same updates as soon as they become available.

In the here and now though, the iPhone 16e’s allure is still in the sleek nature of iOS and apps like Apple News and Apple TV which are very accessible, beautifully designed and feature-rich. There’s also an abundance of helpful widgets that you can add to your homescreen, and the seamless way in which iPhones interact with other Apple devices is unparalleled in the Android space.

Where the iPhone 16e does suffer is in all of the things it’s missing, including MagSafe compatibility, a second rear-facing camera and Apple’s Dynamic Island, all of which can be found on the iPhone 15 which in turn can be found for not that much more if you know where to look.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207301


  • Gorgeous metal and glass build

  • Lovely screen with slim bezels

  • Long software promise

  • Solid camera performance


  • More expensive than last year

  • Junk macro lens

  • No Galaxy AI-branded features

Some mid-range phones can feel a little bit cheap in the hand – often down to the use of materials like plastic over the metal and glass alternative usually found on truly high-end phones – but Samsung’s Galaxy A56 5G is the polar opposite.

Much like the flagship Galaxy S25, the Galaxy A56 is made from an aluminium frame and a glass rear, instantly making it feel more premium in the hand than the likes of the Nothing Phone 3a Pro and Google Pixel 9a

It’s also impressively slim, measuring in at an increasingly rare 7.4mm thick despite housing a 6.7-inch screen and a large 5000mAh battery that makes it feel great to use, especially combined with the device’s flat edges. 

It’s not just a looker either; the 6.7-inch AMOLED screen is a treat for the eyes, with much slimmer bezels than the competing Pixel 9a, and even with the same triple camera setup as the Galaxy A55, it’s still surprisingly solid in the camera department. 

It’s powered by the mid-range Exynos 1580 that, while not in the same league as the Snapdragon 8 Elite of the Poco F7 Ultra, provides solid everyday performance. That’s backed up by OneUI 7, Samsung’s spin on Android 15, with a 5000mAh battery that won’t struggle to last all day on a charge. 

It’s a solid all-rounder with a premium design that won’t disappoint. 

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207377


  • Feels like a flagship

  • Big camera upgrades

  • Relatively speedy

  • Useful AI features


  • Significant price hike

  • No more SD card support

  • Ultrawide camera isn’t great

As soon as you pick up the Oppo Reno 13 Pro, any sense that this phone feels like anything less than a flagship device simply melts away.

The plastic frame of yesteryear has been replaced by a sturdy glass and aluminium backing, which is then complemented by IP69 dust and water resistance, letting you know that the phone is unlikely to be taken down by the elements anytime soon.

There’s also the super fast MediaTek Dimensity 8350 under the hood, which makes general day-to-day use feel not at all dissimilar to what you’ll find on pricier options within our best smartphones list. If you’re concerned about having a phone that can keep up with the latest games then you might be better off picking up the Poco F7 Ultra, but when it comes to social media, multitasking and more, you won’t be feeling hard done by.

Just like almost every other manufacturer nowadays, Oppo has also made sure to embolden the Reno 13 Pro with plenty of AI features to lure in potential adopters. Thankfully, these features don’t feel half-baked like what we’ve found from Moto AI or Honor AI, Instead providing helpful quality of life concepts such as AI Speak, which can analyse a webpage and read it back to you.

The main 50MP camera can pump out some really great shots under the right conditions, and there’s an 8MP ultra-wide too.


  • Incredibly competitive price for the spec

  • Multi-day battery life

  • Big, bright screen


  • Cameras remain a weak point for Poco

  • HyperOS is packed full of bloatware

There are plenty of great options on this list that excel when it comes to overall camera prowess, battery life and more, but if what you value above all else is day to day speed and super fast processing then the Poco F7 is something of a mid-range powerhouse.

Thanks to a winning combination of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and 12GB RAM to keep it running steady, the Poco F7 features some of the best everyday performance you’re going to find at this end of the market, easily outdoing the Pixel 9a and the Samsung Galaxy A56 in several of our tests. Not only is this great for professionals who quickly dip from one app to another, but also gamers who want a smooth experience with classic titles like Call of Duty Mobile.

Luckily there’s a hefty battery that can keep up with the Poco F7’s ambitions of higher than average processing speeds. Under the hood there’s a 6500mAh cell, and even when pushing the battery with a more intensive day than usual over the course of the review, we still struggled to have it drop below the halfway mark, so it’s hard to imagine not being able to get two days of use at a time unless you’re really going all in on some gaming.

That battery life also goes a long way with the phone’s 6.8-inch AMOLED display. It’s exactly the type of panel that’s a joy to use when it comes to streaming films and TV shows, so if you’re the type of person who prefers to use their phone as their main source of entertainment on a flight or a train journey, then the Poco F7 is a great option to have on your person.

As a final point, even though this is still a mid-ranger, you won’t have much to worry about when it comes to longevity. There’s an official IP68 dust and water resistance rating here, which is always handy for peace of mind, particularly if you’re using your phone whilst on holiday and it accidentally gets drenched by other holidaymakers taking a dive into the nearby pool.

Advertisement

Test Data

  Xiaomi 14T Pro OnePlus 13R Google Pixel 9a Nothing Phone 3a Pro Poco F7 Ultra Honor 400 Pro Apple iPhone 16e Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Oppo Reno 13 Pro Poco F7
Geekbench 6 single core 2226 2185 1652 1157 2283 2116 3311 1350 1401 2094
Geekbench 6 multi core 7227 6357 3801 3281 8033 6519 7973 3830 4269 6294
Antutu benchmark test -2
Max brightness 700 nits
1 hour video playback (Netflix, HDR) 6 % 6 % 1 % 5 % 6 % 4 % 4 % 10 % 5 %
Battery drain 60-min (music streaming online) 1 % 6 %
Battery drain 60-min (music streaming offline) 1 %
30 minute gaming (intensive) 4 %
30 minute gaming (light) 6 % 3 % 6 % 3 % 6 % 7 % 3 % 7 % 5 %
1 hour music streaming (online) 1 %
1 hour music streaming (offline) 1 %
Time from 0-100% charge 23 min 90 min 108 min 72 min 32 min 47 min 105 min 73 min 53 min 40 min
Time from 0-50% charge 9 Min 44 Min 40 Min 12 Min 17 Min 27 Min 24 Min 27 Min 17 Min
30-min recharge (included charger) 47 % 98 % 57 % 82 %
15-min recharge (included charger) 25 % 58 % 22 % 46 %
30-min recharge (no charger included) 34 % 40 % 77 % 55 %
15-min recharge (no charger included) 18 % 22 % 44 % 29 %
3D Mark – Wild Life 4985 2597 6023 4614 2939 3199 4341
GFXBench – Aztec Ruins 92 fps 60 fps 66 fps 25 fps 80 fps 61 fps 60 fps 31 fps 77 fps 61 fps
GFXBench – Car Chase 93 fps 60 fps 79 fps 28 fps 87 fps 61 fps 60 fps 39 fps 84 fps 66 fps

Full Specs

  Xiaomi 14T Pro Review OnePlus 13R Review Google Pixel 9a Review Nothing Phone 3a Pro Review Poco F7 Ultra Review Honor 400 Pro Review Apple iPhone 16e Review Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Review Oppo Reno 13 Pro Review Poco F7 Review
UK RRP £649 £679 £499 £449 £649 £699.99 £599 £499 £649 £389
USA RRP Unavailable $499 $599 $499 Unavailable
EU RRP €799.99
Manufacturer Xiaomi OnePlus Google Nothing Xiaomi Honor Apple Samsung Oppo
Screen Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches 6.3 inches 6.77 inches 6.67 inches 6.7 inches 6.1 inches 6.7 inches 6.8 inches 6.8 inches
Storage Capacity 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB 128GB, 256GB 256GB 256GB, 512GB 512GB 128GB, 256GB, 512GB 128GB, 256GB 512GB 256GB
Rear Camera 50MP + 50MP + 12MP 50MP + 50MP + 8MP 48MP + 13MP 50MP + 50MP + 8MP 50MP + 50MP + 32MP 200MP wide, 50MP telephoto, 12MP ultrawide 48MP 50MP + 12MP + 5MP 50MP + 50MP + 8MP 50MP + 8MP
Front Camera 32MP 16MP 13MP 50MP 32MP 50MP main, 2MP depth 12MP 12MP 50MP 20MP
Video Recording Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
IP rating IP68 IP65 IP68 Not Disclosed IP68 IP68 IP68 IP67 IP69 IP68
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh 5100 mAh 5000 mAh 5300 mAh 5300 mAh 5000 mAh 5800 mAh 6500 mAh
Wireless charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Size (Dimensions) 75.1 x 8.39 x 160.4 MM 75.8 x 8 x 161.7 MM 73.3 x 8.9 x 154.7 MM 77.5 x 8.39 x 163.52 MM 75 x 8.4 x 160.3 MM x x 8.1 MM 71.5 x 7.8 x 146.7 MM 77.5 x 7.4 x 162.2 MM 76.6 x 7.6 x 162.8 MM 77.9 x 8.2 x 163.1 MM
Weight 209 G 206 G 186 G 211 G 212 G 203 G 167 G 197 G 195 G 216 G
ASIN B0D6NMDXY7 B0DSWFHTL2 B0DSG6G62L B0DVZSLDSN B0F43L8Y3C
Operating System Android 14 (HyperOS) OxygenOS 15 (Android 15) Android 15 Android 15 HyperOS 2 (Android 15) Android 15 iOS 18 OneUI 7 (Android 15) ColorOS 15 (Android 15) HyperOS 2 (Android 15)
Release Date 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025
First Reviewed Date 25/09/2024 10/01/2025 10/04/2025 04/03/2025 27/03/2025 21/05/2025 11/03/2025 01/03/2025 25/04/2025 27/06/2025
Resolution 2712 x 1220 1264 x 2780 1080 x 2424 2392 x 1080 1440 x 3200 2800 x 1280 2537 x 1170 1080 x 2340 1272 x 2800 1280 x 2772
HDR Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 60 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz 120 Hz
Ports USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Google Tensor G4 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 A18 Samsung Exynos 1580 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
RAM 12GB, 16GB 12GB 8GB 12GB 12GB, 16GB 16GB 8GB 12GB 12GB
Colours Titan Black, Titan Gray, Titan Blue Astral Trail, Nebula Noir Obsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony Black, Grey Black, Yellow Grey, Black Black or White White, Black, Awesome Graphite, Awesome Light Gray, Awesome Olive and Awesome Pink Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Pink Black, White, Cyber Silver
Stated Power 120 W 80 W 23 W 120 W 45 W 80 W 90 W
How much does a mid-range phone cost?

The team at Trusted Reviews defines mid-range smartphones as any handset costing ideally under £700/$700. We raised our definition in 2022, following a gradual rise in prices in the top end of the market.

Are mid-range phones good?

Over the last few years, the mid-range phone market has blossomed, with key companies including Google, Xiaomi, OnePlus, Oppo and Samsung creating mid-range handsets with features traditionally reserved for flagship devices. Recent highlights have included 5G connectivity, high refresh rate screens and improved rear camera sensors. The team of experts at Trusted Reviews recommend most users consider a mid-range smartphone before investing in a flagship as a result.

Are there 5G mid-range phones?

5G is a given in the mid-range market in 2025 with Samsung, Oppo, Motorola, OnePlus and Google having mid-range phones supporting the connectivity.

Product has been added to your cart