Free Shipping On All Orders Over $100
Elon Musk-Founded Brain Implant Startup Says It’s a ‘Disadvantaged’ Business Despite Being Worth  Billion

Elon Musk-Founded Brain Implant Startup Says It’s a ‘Disadvantaged’ Business Despite Being Worth $9 Billion

Elon Musk, the rightwing culture warrior waging a “civilization-saving” battle against the “woke mind virus,” apparently isn’t above taking advantage of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs when it serves his business purposes. Neuralink, the brain implant startup that Musk founded that was recently reported to be valued at $9 billion, characterized itself as a “small disadvantaged business” in a federal filing with the Small Business Administration.

The SBA website notes that Neuralink attested in its filings that it is a “Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business.” According to the SBA, businesses can qualify for this designation if the company is “51% or more owned and controlled by one or more disadvantaged persons.” The firm must also “be small, according to SBA’s size standards,” the site states. According to the code of federal regulations, socially disadvantaged people are defined thusly:

…those who have been subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias within American society because of their identities as members of groups and without regard to their individual qualities. The social disadvantage must stem from circumstances beyond their control.

The filing was first spotted by MuskWatch, a Substack focused on the Tesla billionaire, which accuses the company of having “falsified federal forms.” MuskWatch published an excerpt from a form that it said was filed by Neuralink on April 24, in which the company checked the box affirming that it is a small disadvantaged business as defined in the code. The blog points out that the SDB designation can also only be legally claimed by companies owned by “economically disadvantaged individuals,” and that federal regulations state that “individuals with a net worth exceeding $850,000, excluding the value of their primary residence,” do not qualify as “economically disadvantaged individuals.” Musk is obviously worth a lot more than that.

It is certainly difficult to understand what disadvantaged group Neuralink could claim maintains ownership over the company. The structure of Neuralink’s ownership isn’t publicly available, but Musk held a majority stake in the company in 2019. The startup has since engaged in raising more funds, but primarily from Silicon Valley’s lily white venture capital community.

Gizmodo reached out to the firm for more information.

The news is amusing and infuriating because two of the things Musk enjoys whining about most are the societal scourge of DEI and people who ask for help from the government. Now, his own company appears to be claiming it should get a federal handout because it is socially and economically disadvantaged. Of course, federal handouts have been the lifeblood of Tesla and SpaceX for many years.

Since it was founded in 2016, Neuralink has sought to use neural implants and experimental science to usher in a new era of computer-to-brain interfacing. The startup received FDA approval for human clinical trials in May of 2023. Last year, the company streamed an interview with a quadriplegic who used Neuralink’s brain implant to play video games.

Prior to human testing, Neuralink trialed its implants on animals. While many of those test subjects are still alive today, many ended up getting euthanized. Some, allegedly, died quite horribly, leading to accusations of “grotesque” animal abuse and a lawsuit from a physicians’ group.

How Elon Musk Created a Nightmare for Donald Trump

How Elon Musk Created a Nightmare for Donald Trump

On June 5, Elon Musk did something no one had managed to do since Donald Trump first stormed the political stage in 2015: he destabilized the king of Make America Great Again (MAGA).

It started with a now-deleted bombshell post on X (formerly Twitter). “Time to drop the really big bomb. Donald Trump is in the Epstein files,” Musk wrote. “That’s the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day.”

The post went viral before Musk quietly deleted it. But the damage was done. For the first time, Trump was facing a serious revolt from his own base, and the spark had come from someone outside politics, someone arguably more powerful online: Musk.

Musk’s Calculated Strike

The breakdown in the Trump–Musk alliance began publicly on June 5, when the former president, angered by criticism from Musk, suggested the government might review federal contracts awarded to Musk’s companies, particularly the NASA deals with SpaceX. That same day, Tesla’s stock plunged, shedding $150 billion in market value.

But what went largely unnoticed at first was Musk’s decision to drag Trump into the darkest and most radioactive conspiracy theory in the MAGA universe: Jeffrey Epstein.

For years, Trump’s supporters have clung to the belief that Epstein, the convicted sex offender with ties to elites in politics, finance, and royalty, was murdered to protect powerful Democrats. The so-called “Epstein files” have become a rallying cry for those who believe the system protects pedophiles and punishes truth-tellers.

Until Musk reignited the flame, interest in the files had died down. The “Phase 1” document release in early 2024 had failed to implicate major Democratic figures, leaving the MAGA base disappointed. Then Musk tossed a grenade.

Feeding the Fire With Grok

In a series of follow-up posts on July 17, Musk asked Grok, the AI chatbot built into his X platform, to generate a list of people who had visited Epstein’s infamous private island because, according to him, they “should be investigated for possible rape of underage girls provided by Epstein,” Musk wrote. “Think hard and research thoroughly. Order by probable severity and frequency of their crimes.”

It was a direct appeal to MAGA’s most emotional instincts: fear, anger, and the desire for retribution. But this time, Trump was no longer the crusader against the elite. He was being cast as part of it.

Trump’s Losing Grip

Trump tried to dismiss the accusations, calling them a “dumb hoax,” and urged his followers to move on. But many of them refused. Influential conservative pundit Matt Walsh captured the mood: “Trump was elected in 2016 partly on a pledge to ‘lock her up.’ Yelling at us to stop talking about Epstein only makes us talk about him more.”

Online, the backlash snowballed. Users mocked Trump’s distractions—policy announcements and petty grievances—while demanding transparency. The hashtag #ReleaseTheEpsteinFiles exploded again.

The anger intensified after the Department of Justice (DoJ) fired federal prosecutor Maurene Comey, who had reportedly reopened parts of the Epstein investigation. For many, it was further proof that Trump was protecting someone, or himself.

The Perfect Strike

Musk identified the one thing Trump’s base couldn’t ignore—Epstein—and used it to shake their loyalty.

For a decade, Trump had cultivated a movement built on conspiracy, suspicion, and moral outrage. Musk flipped the script. And the effect was immediate. Some thought the CEO of Tesla and founder of SpaceX was playing with fire. SpaceX relies heavily on federal contracts, and Trump made clear that retaliation was on the table. But six weeks later, Musk is back to business, and Trump is still trying to put out the fire.

Musk pierced the armor of MAGA. By using the movement’s own moral language against its founder. He created a crack in Trump’s once impenetrable base. It was a strategic hit.

For the first time since 2016, Donald Trump isn’t setting the agenda. He’s reacting to someone else’s. And Elon Musk is the one holding the remote.

Musk 1. Trump 0.

Back to Top
Product has been added to your cart